Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative Study

BackgroundDigital interventions have been suggested to facilitate access to mental health care for refugees, who experience structural, linguistic, and cultural barriers to mental health care. Sleep-e, a digital sleep intervention originally developed for German teachers, has...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maja Blomenkamp, Andrea Kiesel, Harald Baumeister, Dirk Lehr, Josef Unterrainer, Lasse B Sander, Kerstin Spanhel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2025-04-01
Series:JMIR Formative Research
Online Access:https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e65412
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849769927062323200
author Maja Blomenkamp
Andrea Kiesel
Harald Baumeister
Dirk Lehr
Josef Unterrainer
Lasse B Sander
Kerstin Spanhel
author_facet Maja Blomenkamp
Andrea Kiesel
Harald Baumeister
Dirk Lehr
Josef Unterrainer
Lasse B Sander
Kerstin Spanhel
author_sort Maja Blomenkamp
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundDigital interventions have been suggested to facilitate access to mental health care for refugees, who experience structural, linguistic, and cultural barriers to mental health care. Sleep-e, a digital sleep intervention originally developed for German teachers, has been culturally adapted for refugees in Germany mainly coming from African and Middle East countries. With the increasing number of refugees from Ukraine and the associated diversity of cultural backgrounds among refugees in Germany, it is essential to assess whether existing digital interventions are culturally appropriate for this target group as well. ObjectiveThe study aimed to investigate the perceived cultural appropriateness of Sleep-e in both its original and culturally adapted versions among refugees in Germany, hereby exploring and possibly contrasting the needs of refugees coming from Ukraine and other countries of origin. MethodsOverall, 13 refugees (6 from Ukraine, 23-66 years old; and 7 from other countries, 26-41 years old) participated in the study. Each participant went through parts of the original or culturally adapted version of the digital sleep intervention, with 5 participants going through both versions. A total of 17 semistructured interviews (11 for the adapted, 6 for the nonadapted intervention version) and 9 think-aloud sessions (6 for the adapted, 3 for the nonadapted intervention version) were conducted to assess cultural appropriateness, suggestions for adaptations, and perceived relevance. Data were transcribed, categorized, and analyzed using structured qualitative content analysis. ResultsThe findings showed key differences in the perceived appropriateness and identification between the 2 refugee groups and the 2 intervention versions. Ukrainian participants expressed positive (n=70) and negative (n=56) feedback on the adapted intervention version, which revealed identity conflicts, as the adapted intervention version was targeted at a refugee population with whom they could not fully identify (18 negative feedback quotes concerning the refugee example characters). Whereas they identified with the European context in the original version, they found the problems described less relevant to their experiences. In contrast, participating refugees from other countries found the culturally adapted version more comprehensible and culturally appropriate (55 positive and 5 negative feedback quotes). No significant usability issues were reported, but several participants highlighted the need for an individualization of the intervention content. ConclusionsNeither the original nor culturally adapted version of the digital sleep intervention fully met the needs of all refugee groups, highlighting the complexity of culturally adapting digital interventions for this population. Particularly, the identity conflict of participating Ukrainian refugees regarding the refugee context suggests that adaptation should go beyond regional considerations and consider the dynamics of social identity. These findings emphasize the relevance of including co-design processes with different refugee populations to ensure broad identification and, herewith, cultural appropriateness of digital interventions. Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00036484; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00036484
format Article
id doaj-art-b6f9fb54761b40f88e8b2c30229ef383
institution DOAJ
issn 2561-326X
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Formative Research
spelling doaj-art-b6f9fb54761b40f88e8b2c30229ef3832025-08-20T03:03:14ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Formative Research2561-326X2025-04-019e6541210.2196/65412Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative StudyMaja Blomenkamphttps://orcid.org/0009-0004-6490-7733Andrea Kieselhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5564-010XHarald Baumeisterhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2040-661XDirk Lehrhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5560-3605Josef Unterrainerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-6360Lasse B Sanderhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-9837Kerstin Spanhelhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4889-1274 BackgroundDigital interventions have been suggested to facilitate access to mental health care for refugees, who experience structural, linguistic, and cultural barriers to mental health care. Sleep-e, a digital sleep intervention originally developed for German teachers, has been culturally adapted for refugees in Germany mainly coming from African and Middle East countries. With the increasing number of refugees from Ukraine and the associated diversity of cultural backgrounds among refugees in Germany, it is essential to assess whether existing digital interventions are culturally appropriate for this target group as well. ObjectiveThe study aimed to investigate the perceived cultural appropriateness of Sleep-e in both its original and culturally adapted versions among refugees in Germany, hereby exploring and possibly contrasting the needs of refugees coming from Ukraine and other countries of origin. MethodsOverall, 13 refugees (6 from Ukraine, 23-66 years old; and 7 from other countries, 26-41 years old) participated in the study. Each participant went through parts of the original or culturally adapted version of the digital sleep intervention, with 5 participants going through both versions. A total of 17 semistructured interviews (11 for the adapted, 6 for the nonadapted intervention version) and 9 think-aloud sessions (6 for the adapted, 3 for the nonadapted intervention version) were conducted to assess cultural appropriateness, suggestions for adaptations, and perceived relevance. Data were transcribed, categorized, and analyzed using structured qualitative content analysis. ResultsThe findings showed key differences in the perceived appropriateness and identification between the 2 refugee groups and the 2 intervention versions. Ukrainian participants expressed positive (n=70) and negative (n=56) feedback on the adapted intervention version, which revealed identity conflicts, as the adapted intervention version was targeted at a refugee population with whom they could not fully identify (18 negative feedback quotes concerning the refugee example characters). Whereas they identified with the European context in the original version, they found the problems described less relevant to their experiences. In contrast, participating refugees from other countries found the culturally adapted version more comprehensible and culturally appropriate (55 positive and 5 negative feedback quotes). No significant usability issues were reported, but several participants highlighted the need for an individualization of the intervention content. ConclusionsNeither the original nor culturally adapted version of the digital sleep intervention fully met the needs of all refugee groups, highlighting the complexity of culturally adapting digital interventions for this population. Particularly, the identity conflict of participating Ukrainian refugees regarding the refugee context suggests that adaptation should go beyond regional considerations and consider the dynamics of social identity. These findings emphasize the relevance of including co-design processes with different refugee populations to ensure broad identification and, herewith, cultural appropriateness of digital interventions. Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00036484; https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00036484https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e65412
spellingShingle Maja Blomenkamp
Andrea Kiesel
Harald Baumeister
Dirk Lehr
Josef Unterrainer
Lasse B Sander
Kerstin Spanhel
Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative Study
JMIR Formative Research
title Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative Study
title_full Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative Study
title_short Assessing the Cultural Fit of a Digital Sleep Intervention for Refugees in Germany: Qualitative Study
title_sort assessing the cultural fit of a digital sleep intervention for refugees in germany qualitative study
url https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e65412
work_keys_str_mv AT majablomenkamp assessingtheculturalfitofadigitalsleepinterventionforrefugeesingermanyqualitativestudy
AT andreakiesel assessingtheculturalfitofadigitalsleepinterventionforrefugeesingermanyqualitativestudy
AT haraldbaumeister assessingtheculturalfitofadigitalsleepinterventionforrefugeesingermanyqualitativestudy
AT dirklehr assessingtheculturalfitofadigitalsleepinterventionforrefugeesingermanyqualitativestudy
AT josefunterrainer assessingtheculturalfitofadigitalsleepinterventionforrefugeesingermanyqualitativestudy
AT lassebsander assessingtheculturalfitofadigitalsleepinterventionforrefugeesingermanyqualitativestudy
AT kerstinspanhel assessingtheculturalfitofadigitalsleepinterventionforrefugeesingermanyqualitativestudy