Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human

This essay engages with the mounting published criticism of neo-institutionalism, but from the point of view of the institutional logical approach, one of its descendants. By addressing each of the main critiques: (1) institutional logical theory is tautological; (2) everything is institutional; (3)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Friedland Roger, Arjaliès Diane-Laure
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: De Gruyter 2024-04-01
Series:Journal of Organizational Sociology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2023-0038
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850100371090833408
author Friedland Roger
Arjaliès Diane-Laure
author_facet Friedland Roger
Arjaliès Diane-Laure
author_sort Friedland Roger
collection DOAJ
description This essay engages with the mounting published criticism of neo-institutionalism, but from the point of view of the institutional logical approach, one of its descendants. By addressing each of the main critiques: (1) institutional logical theory is tautological; (2) everything is institutional; (3) the absence of politics and power, and (4) its lack of a critical theory - the essay attempts to think how to build a theoretical apparatus able to engage with the current institutional crises of the world.
format Article
id doaj-art-b6d2aa0f29eb4654bb3a9f72b3d14d13
institution DOAJ
issn 2752-2997
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher De Gruyter
record_format Article
series Journal of Organizational Sociology
spelling doaj-art-b6d2aa0f29eb4654bb3a9f72b3d14d132025-08-20T02:40:18ZengDe GruyterJournal of Organizational Sociology2752-29972024-04-012219122710.1515/joso-2023-0038Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-HumanFriedland Roger0Arjaliès Diane-Laure1Emeritus Professor of Religious Studies and Sociology, 8786The University of California, Santa Barbara, USA Associate Professor, Ivey Business School, 56026Western University, London, Canada This essay engages with the mounting published criticism of neo-institutionalism, but from the point of view of the institutional logical approach, one of its descendants. By addressing each of the main critiques: (1) institutional logical theory is tautological; (2) everything is institutional; (3) the absence of politics and power, and (4) its lack of a critical theory - the essay attempts to think how to build a theoretical apparatus able to engage with the current institutional crises of the world.https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2023-0038institutional logicscritiquespracticessubstance
spellingShingle Friedland Roger
Arjaliès Diane-Laure
Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human
Journal of Organizational Sociology
institutional logics
critiques
practices
substance
title Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human
title_full Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human
title_fullStr Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human
title_full_unstemmed Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human
title_short Speaking for Human Being: Institutional Logics, Dragons, and the Supra-Human
title_sort speaking for human being institutional logics dragons and the supra human
topic institutional logics
critiques
practices
substance
url https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2023-0038
work_keys_str_mv AT friedlandroger speakingforhumanbeinginstitutionallogicsdragonsandthesuprahuman
AT arjaliesdianelaure speakingforhumanbeinginstitutionallogicsdragonsandthesuprahuman