Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)

Objective The Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS) is a valid self-report measure of treatment burden. The objective of this analysis is to determine severity cut points for its scores. Methods Data from two survey studies of adults with multimorbidity were used to determine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David T. Eton, Kathleen J. Yost
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251350923
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850059672192548864
author David T. Eton
Kathleen J. Yost
author_facet David T. Eton
Kathleen J. Yost
author_sort David T. Eton
collection DOAJ
description Objective The Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS) is a valid self-report measure of treatment burden. The objective of this analysis is to determine severity cut points for its scores. Methods Data from two survey studies of adults with multimorbidity were used to determine estimates of low, moderate, and high burden for twelve PETS scores. Anchor-based analyses were used to map mean PETS scores onto scores of other self-report measures, including physical and mental health, self-efficacy, and activity limitations. Low, medium, and high scores on the anchors were based on published thresholds or tertile splits of score distributions. Mean PETS scores were compared across levels of the anchor variable using analysis of variance (ANOVA) then summarized to produce burden severity cut points. Results Study 1 featured survey data from 332 adults with multimorbidity (mean age = 66 years, 56% female); study 2 featured survey data from 439 adults with multimorbidity (mean age = 60 years, 62% female). Anchor measures were correlated with PETS scores at rho≥ 0.30. ANOVAs comparing PETS scores across the levels of each anchor variable were all significant ( p s< .001). Estimates were placed into data tables. Cut scores for discriminating treatment burden severity levels were identified as the midpoint between the mean PETS scores associated with adjacent anchor categories (e.g., low vs. medium and medium vs. high burden), rounded to the nearest whole number. Conclusions Severity thresholds can improve the interpretability of PETS scores. The preliminary estimates derived require verification in future studies.
format Article
id doaj-art-b6a35d67eb834cf1a97d6f1cc43821dd
institution DOAJ
issn 2633-5565
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity
spelling doaj-art-b6a35d67eb834cf1a97d6f1cc43821dd2025-08-20T02:50:49ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity2633-55652025-06-011510.1177/26335565251350923Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)David T. EtonKathleen J. YostObjective The Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS) is a valid self-report measure of treatment burden. The objective of this analysis is to determine severity cut points for its scores. Methods Data from two survey studies of adults with multimorbidity were used to determine estimates of low, moderate, and high burden for twelve PETS scores. Anchor-based analyses were used to map mean PETS scores onto scores of other self-report measures, including physical and mental health, self-efficacy, and activity limitations. Low, medium, and high scores on the anchors were based on published thresholds or tertile splits of score distributions. Mean PETS scores were compared across levels of the anchor variable using analysis of variance (ANOVA) then summarized to produce burden severity cut points. Results Study 1 featured survey data from 332 adults with multimorbidity (mean age = 66 years, 56% female); study 2 featured survey data from 439 adults with multimorbidity (mean age = 60 years, 62% female). Anchor measures were correlated with PETS scores at rho≥ 0.30. ANOVAs comparing PETS scores across the levels of each anchor variable were all significant ( p s< .001). Estimates were placed into data tables. Cut scores for discriminating treatment burden severity levels were identified as the midpoint between the mean PETS scores associated with adjacent anchor categories (e.g., low vs. medium and medium vs. high burden), rounded to the nearest whole number. Conclusions Severity thresholds can improve the interpretability of PETS scores. The preliminary estimates derived require verification in future studies.https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251350923
spellingShingle David T. Eton
Kathleen J. Yost
Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)
Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity
title Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)
title_full Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)
title_fullStr Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)
title_full_unstemmed Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)
title_short Deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self-management (PETS)
title_sort deriving severity thresholds of treatment burden for the patient experience with treatment and self management pets
url https://doi.org/10.1177/26335565251350923
work_keys_str_mv AT davidteton derivingseveritythresholdsoftreatmentburdenforthepatientexperiencewithtreatmentandselfmanagementpets
AT kathleenjyost derivingseveritythresholdsoftreatmentburdenforthepatientexperiencewithtreatmentandselfmanagementpets