Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.

<h4>Objectives</h4>In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC.<h4>Method</h4>The scoping...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nedeljko Jovanovic, Tricia Chinnery, Sarah A Mattonen, David A Palma, Philip C Doyle, Julie A Theurer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278135&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540066726019072
author Nedeljko Jovanovic
Tricia Chinnery
Sarah A Mattonen
David A Palma
Philip C Doyle
Julie A Theurer
author_facet Nedeljko Jovanovic
Tricia Chinnery
Sarah A Mattonen
David A Palma
Philip C Doyle
Julie A Theurer
author_sort Nedeljko Jovanovic
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC.<h4>Method</h4>The scoping review was performed in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage methodology and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.<h4>Information sources</h4>Eligible studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases.<h4>Study selection</h4>Inclusion criteria represented studies of adult HNC patients in which sarcopenia was listed as an outcome, full-text articles written in English, and empirical research studies with a quantitative design.<h4>Data extraction</h4>Eligible studies were assessed using a proprietary data extraction form. General information, article details and characteristics, and details related to the concept of the scoping review were extracted in an iterative process.<h4>Results</h4>Seventy-six studies published internationally from 2016 to 2021 on sarcopenia in HNC were included. The majority were retrospective (n = 56; 74%) and the prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 3.8% to 78.7%. Approximately two-thirds of studies used computed tomography (CT) to assess sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) (n = 53; 70%) was the most prevalent metric used to identify sarcopenia, followed by SMI at the third cervical vertebra (C3) (n = 4; 5%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Currently, the most effective strategy to assess sarcopenia in HNC depends on several factors, including access to resources, patient and treatment characteristics, and the prognostic significance of outcomes used to represent sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured at C3 may represent a practical, precise, and cost-effective biomarker for the detection of sarcopenia. However, combining SMM measurements at C3 with other sarcopenic parameters-including muscle strength and physical performance-may provide a more accurate risk profile for sarcopenia assessment and allow for a greater understanding of this condition in HNC.
format Article
id doaj-art-b69ad03f7fd04f26a039962da1e12ff7
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-b69ad03f7fd04f26a039962da1e12ff72025-02-05T05:32:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011711e027813510.1371/journal.pone.0278135Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.Nedeljko JovanovicTricia ChinnerySarah A MattonenDavid A PalmaPhilip C DoyleJulie A Theurer<h4>Objectives</h4>In those undergoing treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), sarcopenia is a strong prognostic factor for outcomes and mortality. This review identified working definitions and methods used to objectively assess sarcopenia in HNC.<h4>Method</h4>The scoping review was performed in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage methodology and the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.<h4>Information sources</h4>Eligible studies were identified using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases.<h4>Study selection</h4>Inclusion criteria represented studies of adult HNC patients in which sarcopenia was listed as an outcome, full-text articles written in English, and empirical research studies with a quantitative design.<h4>Data extraction</h4>Eligible studies were assessed using a proprietary data extraction form. General information, article details and characteristics, and details related to the concept of the scoping review were extracted in an iterative process.<h4>Results</h4>Seventy-six studies published internationally from 2016 to 2021 on sarcopenia in HNC were included. The majority were retrospective (n = 56; 74%) and the prevalence of sarcopenia ranged from 3.8% to 78.7%. Approximately two-thirds of studies used computed tomography (CT) to assess sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) (n = 53; 70%) was the most prevalent metric used to identify sarcopenia, followed by SMI at the third cervical vertebra (C3) (n = 4; 5%).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Currently, the most effective strategy to assess sarcopenia in HNC depends on several factors, including access to resources, patient and treatment characteristics, and the prognostic significance of outcomes used to represent sarcopenia. Skeletal muscle mass (SMM) measured at C3 may represent a practical, precise, and cost-effective biomarker for the detection of sarcopenia. However, combining SMM measurements at C3 with other sarcopenic parameters-including muscle strength and physical performance-may provide a more accurate risk profile for sarcopenia assessment and allow for a greater understanding of this condition in HNC.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278135&type=printable
spellingShingle Nedeljko Jovanovic
Tricia Chinnery
Sarah A Mattonen
David A Palma
Philip C Doyle
Julie A Theurer
Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.
PLoS ONE
title Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.
title_full Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.
title_fullStr Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.
title_full_unstemmed Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.
title_short Sarcopenia in head and neck cancer: A scoping review.
title_sort sarcopenia in head and neck cancer a scoping review
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0278135&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT nedeljkojovanovic sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT triciachinnery sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT sarahamattonen sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT davidapalma sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT philipcdoyle sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview
AT julieatheurer sarcopeniainheadandneckcancerascopingreview