Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.

<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the impact of scheduling caesarean section prior to versus after 39 completed weeks of gestation on the occurrence of unscheduled caesarean section and rescheduling of the procedure.<h4>Methods</h4>Secondary analysis from a multicentre randomised...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julie Glavind, Tine Brink Henriksen, Sara Fevre Kindberg, Niels Uldbjerg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084744&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850142920527577088
author Julie Glavind
Tine Brink Henriksen
Sara Fevre Kindberg
Niels Uldbjerg
author_facet Julie Glavind
Tine Brink Henriksen
Sara Fevre Kindberg
Niels Uldbjerg
author_sort Julie Glavind
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the impact of scheduling caesarean section prior to versus after 39 completed weeks of gestation on the occurrence of unscheduled caesarean section and rescheduling of the procedure.<h4>Methods</h4>Secondary analysis from a multicentre randomised open-label trial including singleton pregnant women with a healthy foetus and a reliable due date. Women were allocated by computerized telephone randomisation to planned caesarean section at 38 weeks and three days or 39 weeks and three days. The outcomes were unscheduled deliveries with provided reasons, such as spontaneous labour onset or supervening complications, and any changes in the scheduled delivery date. Statistical analyses were according to intention-to-treat using Fisher's exact test.<h4>Results</h4>From March 2009 to June 2011 1,274 women were included. Median difference in gestational age at delivery was six days. Compared to the 38 weeks group, the women in the 39 weeks group were more likely to have an unscheduled caesarean section (15.2% vs. 9.3%; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.21; 2.22), to deliver between 6 pm and 8 am (10 % vs. 6%; RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14; 2.47), or to have the procedure rescheduled (36.7% vs. 23%; RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.34;1.90).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Scheduling caesarean section after 39 weeks leads to a 60% increase in unscheduled caesarean sections and a 70% increase in delivery outside regular work hours as compared to scheduling of the procedure prior to 39 weeks.<h4>Trial registration</h4>www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00835003 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00835003?term=NCT00835003&rank=1.
format Article
id doaj-art-b68f71bae82e417d9b99db5444f0ba28
institution OA Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-b68f71bae82e417d9b99db5444f0ba282025-08-20T02:28:54ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-01812e8474410.1371/journal.pone.0084744Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.Julie GlavindTine Brink HenriksenSara Fevre KindbergNiels Uldbjerg<h4>Objectives</h4>To compare the impact of scheduling caesarean section prior to versus after 39 completed weeks of gestation on the occurrence of unscheduled caesarean section and rescheduling of the procedure.<h4>Methods</h4>Secondary analysis from a multicentre randomised open-label trial including singleton pregnant women with a healthy foetus and a reliable due date. Women were allocated by computerized telephone randomisation to planned caesarean section at 38 weeks and three days or 39 weeks and three days. The outcomes were unscheduled deliveries with provided reasons, such as spontaneous labour onset or supervening complications, and any changes in the scheduled delivery date. Statistical analyses were according to intention-to-treat using Fisher's exact test.<h4>Results</h4>From March 2009 to June 2011 1,274 women were included. Median difference in gestational age at delivery was six days. Compared to the 38 weeks group, the women in the 39 weeks group were more likely to have an unscheduled caesarean section (15.2% vs. 9.3%; RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.21; 2.22), to deliver between 6 pm and 8 am (10 % vs. 6%; RR 1.68, 95% CI 1.14; 2.47), or to have the procedure rescheduled (36.7% vs. 23%; RR 1.6, 95% CI 1.34;1.90).<h4>Conclusions</h4>Scheduling caesarean section after 39 weeks leads to a 60% increase in unscheduled caesarean sections and a 70% increase in delivery outside regular work hours as compared to scheduling of the procedure prior to 39 weeks.<h4>Trial registration</h4>www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00835003 http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00835003?term=NCT00835003&rank=1.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084744&type=printable
spellingShingle Julie Glavind
Tine Brink Henriksen
Sara Fevre Kindberg
Niels Uldbjerg
Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.
title_full Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.
title_fullStr Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.
title_short Randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks: unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics--a secondary analysis.
title_sort randomised trial of planned caesarean section prior to versus after 39 weeks unscheduled deliveries and facility logistics a secondary analysis
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0084744&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT julieglavind randomisedtrialofplannedcaesareansectionpriortoversusafter39weeksunscheduleddeliveriesandfacilitylogisticsasecondaryanalysis
AT tinebrinkhenriksen randomisedtrialofplannedcaesareansectionpriortoversusafter39weeksunscheduleddeliveriesandfacilitylogisticsasecondaryanalysis
AT sarafevrekindberg randomisedtrialofplannedcaesareansectionpriortoversusafter39weeksunscheduleddeliveriesandfacilitylogisticsasecondaryanalysis
AT nielsuldbjerg randomisedtrialofplannedcaesareansectionpriortoversusafter39weeksunscheduleddeliveriesandfacilitylogisticsasecondaryanalysis