Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?

The relationship between offices and planning in Brussels could be summed up as a series of missed opportunities. Decisions were taken blow by blow, without truly taking account of what had been planned. This real estate game, which has been going on for half a century, has had sometimes obscure cau...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michel De Beule
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université libre de Bruxelles - ULB 2010-03-01
Series:Brussels Studies
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/753
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849398071425761280
author Michel De Beule
author_facet Michel De Beule
author_sort Michel De Beule
collection DOAJ
description The relationship between offices and planning in Brussels could be summed up as a series of missed opportunities. Decisions were taken blow by blow, without truly taking account of what had been planned. This real estate game, which has been going on for half a century, has had sometimes obscure causes, often unspoken motives, but reasons that have always been logical for at least one of the four players involved in the overall misunderstanding, i.e., promoters, national government (and then federal and regional governments), local officials, and the residents themselves. Planning long remained officious, with attempts made to intervene in strips. Even though the authorities made a relevant planning proposal starting in 1958, the future European Quarter was created in silence and without directives. With the country’s subdivision into regions planning became official, but the building of offices nevertheless came in for little supervision. In 1999, more than twenty years after the adoption of Brussels’s first area plan, 47% of the some 10 million square metres of offices in Brussels (in edifices with at least 1 000 m² of office space, and thus very often monofunctional buildings) was outside the administrative zones that the area plan had set. Another form of planning went into effect in 1995, but the relationships amongst the players of the real estate game remain ambiguous. The four-party misunderstanding continues.
format Article
id doaj-art-b67258c19a2240039b11c862a85c5b5d
institution Kabale University
issn 2031-0293
language English
publishDate 2010-03-01
publisher Université libre de Bruxelles - ULB
record_format Article
series Brussels Studies
spelling doaj-art-b67258c19a2240039b11c862a85c5b5d2025-08-20T03:38:43ZengUniversité libre de Bruxelles - ULBBrussels Studies2031-02932010-03-0110.4000/brussels.753Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?Michel De BeuleThe relationship between offices and planning in Brussels could be summed up as a series of missed opportunities. Decisions were taken blow by blow, without truly taking account of what had been planned. This real estate game, which has been going on for half a century, has had sometimes obscure causes, often unspoken motives, but reasons that have always been logical for at least one of the four players involved in the overall misunderstanding, i.e., promoters, national government (and then federal and regional governments), local officials, and the residents themselves. Planning long remained officious, with attempts made to intervene in strips. Even though the authorities made a relevant planning proposal starting in 1958, the future European Quarter was created in silence and without directives. With the country’s subdivision into regions planning became official, but the building of offices nevertheless came in for little supervision. In 1999, more than twenty years after the adoption of Brussels’s first area plan, 47% of the some 10 million square metres of offices in Brussels (in edifices with at least 1 000 m² of office space, and thus very often monofunctional buildings) was outside the administrative zones that the area plan had set. Another form of planning went into effect in 1995, but the relationships amongst the players of the real estate game remain ambiguous. The four-party misunderstanding continues.http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/753
spellingShingle Michel De Beule
Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?
Brussels Studies
title Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?
title_full Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?
title_fullStr Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?
title_full_unstemmed Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?
title_short Kantoren en planning in Brussel, 50 jaar van gemiste kansen?
title_sort kantoren en planning in brussel 50 jaar van gemiste kansen
url http://journals.openedition.org/brussels/753
work_keys_str_mv AT micheldebeule kantorenenplanninginbrussel50jaarvangemistekansen