Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional Model

While our world consistently presents complicated, interdisciplinary problems with STEM foundations, most pre-university curricula do not encourage drawing on multidisciplinary knowledge in the sciences and engineering to create solutions. We developed an instructional approach, Iterative Science an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nancy B. Songer, Julia E. Calabrese, Holly Cordner, Daniel Aina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-11-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/11/1255
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850217418629054464
author Nancy B. Songer
Julia E. Calabrese
Holly Cordner
Daniel Aina
author_facet Nancy B. Songer
Julia E. Calabrese
Holly Cordner
Daniel Aina
author_sort Nancy B. Songer
collection DOAJ
description While our world consistently presents complicated, interdisciplinary problems with STEM foundations, most pre-university curricula do not encourage drawing on multidisciplinary knowledge in the sciences and engineering to create solutions. We developed an instructional approach, Iterative Science and Engineering (ISE), that cycles through scientific investigation and engineering design and culminates in constructing a solution to a local environmental challenge. Next, we created, revised, and evaluated a six-week ISE curricular program, Invasive Insects, culminating in 6th–9th-grade students building traps to mitigate local invasive insect populations. Over three Design-Based Research (DBR) cycles, we gathered and analyzed identical pre and post-test data from 554 adolescents to address the research question: what three-dimensional (3D) science and engineering knowledge do adolescents demonstrate over three DBR cycles associated with a curricular program following the Iterative Science and Engineering instructional approach? Results document students’ significant statistical improvements, with differential outcomes in different cycles. For example, most students demonstrated significant learning of 3D science and engineering argument construction in all cycles—still, students only significantly improved engineering design when they performed guided reflection on their designs and physically built a second trap. Our results suggest that the development, refinement, and empirical evaluation of an ISE curricular program led to students’ design, building, evaluation, and sharing of their learning of mitigating local invasive insect populations. To address complex, interdisciplinary challenges, we must provide opportunities for fluid and iterative STEM learning through scientific investigation and engineering design cycles.
format Article
id doaj-art-b6281c5419c7409aba6488274ffd4aa6
institution OA Journals
issn 2227-7102
language English
publishDate 2024-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj-art-b6281c5419c7409aba6488274ffd4aa62025-08-20T02:08:03ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022024-11-011411125510.3390/educsci14111255Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional ModelNancy B. Songer0Julia E. Calabrese1Holly Cordner2Daniel Aina3College of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USACollege of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USACollege of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USACollege of Education, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USAWhile our world consistently presents complicated, interdisciplinary problems with STEM foundations, most pre-university curricula do not encourage drawing on multidisciplinary knowledge in the sciences and engineering to create solutions. We developed an instructional approach, Iterative Science and Engineering (ISE), that cycles through scientific investigation and engineering design and culminates in constructing a solution to a local environmental challenge. Next, we created, revised, and evaluated a six-week ISE curricular program, Invasive Insects, culminating in 6th–9th-grade students building traps to mitigate local invasive insect populations. Over three Design-Based Research (DBR) cycles, we gathered and analyzed identical pre and post-test data from 554 adolescents to address the research question: what three-dimensional (3D) science and engineering knowledge do adolescents demonstrate over three DBR cycles associated with a curricular program following the Iterative Science and Engineering instructional approach? Results document students’ significant statistical improvements, with differential outcomes in different cycles. For example, most students demonstrated significant learning of 3D science and engineering argument construction in all cycles—still, students only significantly improved engineering design when they performed guided reflection on their designs and physically built a second trap. Our results suggest that the development, refinement, and empirical evaluation of an ISE curricular program led to students’ design, building, evaluation, and sharing of their learning of mitigating local invasive insect populations. To address complex, interdisciplinary challenges, we must provide opportunities for fluid and iterative STEM learning through scientific investigation and engineering design cycles.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/11/1255science educationengineering educationinterdisciplinary science
spellingShingle Nancy B. Songer
Julia E. Calabrese
Holly Cordner
Daniel Aina
Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional Model
Education Sciences
science education
engineering education
interdisciplinary science
title Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional Model
title_full Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional Model
title_fullStr Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional Model
title_full_unstemmed Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional Model
title_short Usable STEM: Student Outcomes in Science and Engineering Associated with the Iterative Science and Engineering Instructional Model
title_sort usable stem student outcomes in science and engineering associated with the iterative science and engineering instructional model
topic science education
engineering education
interdisciplinary science
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/14/11/1255
work_keys_str_mv AT nancybsonger usablestemstudentoutcomesinscienceandengineeringassociatedwiththeiterativescienceandengineeringinstructionalmodel
AT juliaecalabrese usablestemstudentoutcomesinscienceandengineeringassociatedwiththeiterativescienceandengineeringinstructionalmodel
AT hollycordner usablestemstudentoutcomesinscienceandengineeringassociatedwiththeiterativescienceandengineeringinstructionalmodel
AT danielaina usablestemstudentoutcomesinscienceandengineeringassociatedwiththeiterativescienceandengineeringinstructionalmodel