Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys.
<h4>Background</h4>Home working has increased since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic's onset with concerns that it may have adverse health implications. We assessed the association between home working and social and mental wellbeing among the employed population age...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-04-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Medicine |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850134279891189760 |
|---|---|
| author | Jacques Wels Bożena Wielgoszewska Bettina Moltrecht Charlotte Booth Michael J Green Olivia Kl Hamilton Evangelia Demou Giorgio Di Gessa Charlotte Huggins Jingmin Zhu Gillian Santorelli Richard J Silverwood Daniel Kopasker Richard J Shaw Alun Hughes Praveetha Patalay Claire Steves Nishi Chaturvedi David J Porteous Rebecca Rhead Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi George B Ploubidis |
| author_facet | Jacques Wels Bożena Wielgoszewska Bettina Moltrecht Charlotte Booth Michael J Green Olivia Kl Hamilton Evangelia Demou Giorgio Di Gessa Charlotte Huggins Jingmin Zhu Gillian Santorelli Richard J Silverwood Daniel Kopasker Richard J Shaw Alun Hughes Praveetha Patalay Claire Steves Nishi Chaturvedi David J Porteous Rebecca Rhead Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi George B Ploubidis |
| author_sort | Jacques Wels |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Home working has increased since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic's onset with concerns that it may have adverse health implications. We assessed the association between home working and social and mental wellbeing among the employed population aged 16 to 66 through harmonised analyses of 7 UK longitudinal studies.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We estimated associations between home working and measures of psychological distress, low life satisfaction, poor self-rated health, low social contact, and loneliness across 3 different stages of the pandemic (T1 = April to June 2020 -first lockdown, T2 = July to October 2020 -eased restrictions, T3 = November 2020 to March 2021 -second lockdown) using modified Poisson regression and meta-analyses to pool results across studies. We successively adjusted the model for sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex), job characteristics (e.g., sector of activity, pre-pandemic home working propensities), and pre-pandemic health. Among respectively 10,367, 11,585, and 12,179 participants at T1, T2, and T3, we found higher rates of home working at T1 and T3 compared with T2, reflecting lockdown periods. Home working was not associated with psychological distress at T1 (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.08) or T2 (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.11), but a detrimental association was found with psychological distress at T3 (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.30). Study limitations include the fact that pre-pandemic home working propensities were derived from external sources, no information was collected on home working dosage and possible reverse association between change in wellbeing and home working likelihood.<h4>Conclusions</h4>No clear evidence of an association between home working and mental wellbeing was found, apart from greater risk of psychological distress during the second lockdown, but differences across subgroups (e.g., by sex or level of education) may exist. Longer term shifts to home working might not have adverse impacts on population wellbeing in the absence of pandemic restrictions but further monitoring of health inequalities is required. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b5c8c326ec17474aa0ecf94fb81e9c70 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1549-1277 1549-1676 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-04-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS Medicine |
| spelling | doaj-art-b5c8c326ec17474aa0ecf94fb81e9c702025-08-20T02:31:44ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Medicine1549-12771549-16762023-04-01204e100421410.1371/journal.pmed.1004214Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys.Jacques WelsBożena WielgoszewskaBettina MoltrechtCharlotte BoothMichael J GreenOlivia Kl HamiltonEvangelia DemouGiorgio Di GessaCharlotte HugginsJingmin ZhuGillian SantorelliRichard J SilverwoodDaniel KopaskerRichard J ShawAlun HughesPraveetha PatalayClaire StevesNishi ChaturvediDavid J PorteousRebecca RheadSrinivasa Vittal KatikireddiGeorge B Ploubidis<h4>Background</h4>Home working has increased since the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic's onset with concerns that it may have adverse health implications. We assessed the association between home working and social and mental wellbeing among the employed population aged 16 to 66 through harmonised analyses of 7 UK longitudinal studies.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>We estimated associations between home working and measures of psychological distress, low life satisfaction, poor self-rated health, low social contact, and loneliness across 3 different stages of the pandemic (T1 = April to June 2020 -first lockdown, T2 = July to October 2020 -eased restrictions, T3 = November 2020 to March 2021 -second lockdown) using modified Poisson regression and meta-analyses to pool results across studies. We successively adjusted the model for sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., age, sex), job characteristics (e.g., sector of activity, pre-pandemic home working propensities), and pre-pandemic health. Among respectively 10,367, 11,585, and 12,179 participants at T1, T2, and T3, we found higher rates of home working at T1 and T3 compared with T2, reflecting lockdown periods. Home working was not associated with psychological distress at T1 (RR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.79 to 1.08) or T2 (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.11), but a detrimental association was found with psychological distress at T3 (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.30). Study limitations include the fact that pre-pandemic home working propensities were derived from external sources, no information was collected on home working dosage and possible reverse association between change in wellbeing and home working likelihood.<h4>Conclusions</h4>No clear evidence of an association between home working and mental wellbeing was found, apart from greater risk of psychological distress during the second lockdown, but differences across subgroups (e.g., by sex or level of education) may exist. Longer term shifts to home working might not have adverse impacts on population wellbeing in the absence of pandemic restrictions but further monitoring of health inequalities is required.https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214&type=printable |
| spellingShingle | Jacques Wels Bożena Wielgoszewska Bettina Moltrecht Charlotte Booth Michael J Green Olivia Kl Hamilton Evangelia Demou Giorgio Di Gessa Charlotte Huggins Jingmin Zhu Gillian Santorelli Richard J Silverwood Daniel Kopasker Richard J Shaw Alun Hughes Praveetha Patalay Claire Steves Nishi Chaturvedi David J Porteous Rebecca Rhead Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi George B Ploubidis Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys. PLoS Medicine |
| title | Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys. |
| title_full | Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys. |
| title_fullStr | Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys. |
| title_short | Home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK: Evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys. |
| title_sort | home working and social and mental wellbeing at different stages of the covid 19 pandemic in the uk evidence from 7 longitudinal population surveys |
| url | https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1004214&type=printable |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT jacqueswels homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT bozenawielgoszewska homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT bettinamoltrecht homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT charlottebooth homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT michaeljgreen homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT oliviaklhamilton homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT evangeliademou homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT giorgiodigessa homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT charlottehuggins homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT jingminzhu homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT gilliansantorelli homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT richardjsilverwood homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT danielkopasker homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT richardjshaw homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT alunhughes homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT praveethapatalay homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT clairesteves homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT nishichaturvedi homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT davidjporteous homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT rebeccarhead homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT srinivasavittalkatikireddi homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys AT georgebploubidis homeworkingandsocialandmentalwellbeingatdifferentstagesofthecovid19pandemicintheukevidencefrom7longitudinalpopulationsurveys |