Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production

The amount of waste generated by society is constantly increasing. Consequently, there is a need to develop new and better methods of treating it. A significant part of municipal waste is biowaste, which can be treated as a source of valuable resources such as nutrients, organic matter, and energy....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Agnieszka Bezuszko, Marcin Landrat, Krzysztof Pikoń, Ana F. Ferreira, Abel Rodrigues, Gabor Olejarz, Max Lewandowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-07-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/14/7858
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849406800768532480
author Agnieszka Bezuszko
Marcin Landrat
Krzysztof Pikoń
Ana F. Ferreira
Abel Rodrigues
Gabor Olejarz
Max Lewandowski
author_facet Agnieszka Bezuszko
Marcin Landrat
Krzysztof Pikoń
Ana F. Ferreira
Abel Rodrigues
Gabor Olejarz
Max Lewandowski
author_sort Agnieszka Bezuszko
collection DOAJ
description The amount of waste generated by society is constantly increasing. Consequently, there is a need to develop new and better methods of treating it. A significant part of municipal waste is biowaste, which can be treated as a source of valuable resources such as nutrients, organic matter, and energy. The present work aims to determine the properties of the tested household biowaste and the possibility of using it as feedstock in slow pyrolysis to obtain biochar. The slow pyrolysis process of the biowaste was carried out in an electrically heated Horizontal Tube Furnace (HTF) at temperatures of 400 °C, 500 °C, and 600 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere. The analysis showed that depending on the type and composition of the biowaste, its properties are different. All the biowaste tested has a high moisture content (between 63.51% and 81.53%), which means that the biowaste needs to be dried before the slow pyrolysis process. The characteristics of kitchen biowaste are similar to those of food waste studied by other researchers in different regions of the world. In addition, the properties of kitchen biowaste are similar to those of the typical biomasses used to produce biochar via slow pyrolysis, such as wood, almond shells, and rice husks. Both kinds of garden biowaste tested may have been contaminated (soil, rocks) during collection, which affected the high ash content of spring (17.75%) and autumn (43.83%) biowaste. This, in turn, affected all the properties of the garden biowaste, which differed significantly from both the literature data of other garden wastes and from the properties of typical biomass feedstocks used to produce biochar in slow pyrolysis. For all biowaste tested, it was shown that as the pyrolysis temperature increases, the yield of biochar decreases. The maximum mass yield of biochar for kitchen, spring garden, and autumn garden biowaste was 36.64%, 66.53%, and 66.99%, respectively. Comparing the characteristics of biowaste before slow pyrolysis, biochar obtained from kitchen biowaste had a high carbon content, fixed carbon, and a higher HHV. In contrast, biochar obtained from garden biowaste had a lower carbon content and a lower HHV.
format Article
id doaj-art-b5c1944da0b345608b9534b84952e103
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-3417
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj-art-b5c1944da0b345608b9534b84952e1032025-08-20T03:36:15ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172025-07-011514785810.3390/app15147858Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar ProductionAgnieszka Bezuszko0Marcin Landrat1Krzysztof Pikoń2Ana F. Ferreira3Abel Rodrigues4Gabor Olejarz5Max Lewandowski6Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 40-100 Gliwice, PolandDepartment of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 40-100 Gliwice, PolandDepartment of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 40-100 Gliwice, PolandIDMEC, Mechanical Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, PortugalIDMEC, Mechanical Engineering Department, Instituto Superior Técnico, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, PortugalDepartment of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 40-100 Gliwice, PolandDepartment of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Silesian University of Technology, 40-100 Gliwice, PolandThe amount of waste generated by society is constantly increasing. Consequently, there is a need to develop new and better methods of treating it. A significant part of municipal waste is biowaste, which can be treated as a source of valuable resources such as nutrients, organic matter, and energy. The present work aims to determine the properties of the tested household biowaste and the possibility of using it as feedstock in slow pyrolysis to obtain biochar. The slow pyrolysis process of the biowaste was carried out in an electrically heated Horizontal Tube Furnace (HTF) at temperatures of 400 °C, 500 °C, and 600 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere. The analysis showed that depending on the type and composition of the biowaste, its properties are different. All the biowaste tested has a high moisture content (between 63.51% and 81.53%), which means that the biowaste needs to be dried before the slow pyrolysis process. The characteristics of kitchen biowaste are similar to those of food waste studied by other researchers in different regions of the world. In addition, the properties of kitchen biowaste are similar to those of the typical biomasses used to produce biochar via slow pyrolysis, such as wood, almond shells, and rice husks. Both kinds of garden biowaste tested may have been contaminated (soil, rocks) during collection, which affected the high ash content of spring (17.75%) and autumn (43.83%) biowaste. This, in turn, affected all the properties of the garden biowaste, which differed significantly from both the literature data of other garden wastes and from the properties of typical biomass feedstocks used to produce biochar in slow pyrolysis. For all biowaste tested, it was shown that as the pyrolysis temperature increases, the yield of biochar decreases. The maximum mass yield of biochar for kitchen, spring garden, and autumn garden biowaste was 36.64%, 66.53%, and 66.99%, respectively. Comparing the characteristics of biowaste before slow pyrolysis, biochar obtained from kitchen biowaste had a high carbon content, fixed carbon, and a higher HHV. In contrast, biochar obtained from garden biowaste had a lower carbon content and a lower HHV.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/14/7858household biowastepyrolysisbiocharbiomasswastegarden waste
spellingShingle Agnieszka Bezuszko
Marcin Landrat
Krzysztof Pikoń
Ana F. Ferreira
Abel Rodrigues
Gabor Olejarz
Max Lewandowski
Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production
Applied Sciences
household biowaste
pyrolysis
biochar
biomass
waste
garden waste
title Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production
title_full Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production
title_fullStr Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production
title_full_unstemmed Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production
title_short Slow Pyrolysis as a Method of Treating Household Biowaste for Biochar Production
title_sort slow pyrolysis as a method of treating household biowaste for biochar production
topic household biowaste
pyrolysis
biochar
biomass
waste
garden waste
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/15/14/7858
work_keys_str_mv AT agnieszkabezuszko slowpyrolysisasamethodoftreatinghouseholdbiowasteforbiocharproduction
AT marcinlandrat slowpyrolysisasamethodoftreatinghouseholdbiowasteforbiocharproduction
AT krzysztofpikon slowpyrolysisasamethodoftreatinghouseholdbiowasteforbiocharproduction
AT anafferreira slowpyrolysisasamethodoftreatinghouseholdbiowasteforbiocharproduction
AT abelrodrigues slowpyrolysisasamethodoftreatinghouseholdbiowasteforbiocharproduction
AT gaborolejarz slowpyrolysisasamethodoftreatinghouseholdbiowasteforbiocharproduction
AT maxlewandowski slowpyrolysisasamethodoftreatinghouseholdbiowasteforbiocharproduction