Echocardiographic Calcium Score of Aortic Valve Correlates with Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Background: Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are at a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The coronary artery calcification (CAC) score by the Ct-scan Agatston calcium score (ACS) > 100 classifies FH at a higher risk. The echocardiographic calcium s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelo Baldassare Cefalù, Emilio Nardi, Antonina Giammanco, Carola Maria Gagliardo, Carlo Maria Barbagallo, Ludovico La Grutta, Patrizia Toia, Federica Brucato, Chiara Scrimali, Teresa Maria Grazia Fasciana, Rossella Spina, Marina Lanza, Francesco Vitale, Davide Noto, Maurizio Averna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-03-01
Series:Life
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/3/506
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) are at a high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The coronary artery calcification (CAC) score by the Ct-scan Agatston calcium score (ACS) > 100 classifies FH at a higher risk. The echocardiographic calcium score (ECS) evaluates aortic valve calcifications and is considered a good predictor of the atherosclerotic burden and cardiovascular outcome. Objective: To test the ECS as a predictor of ACS > 100 in a HeFH cohort. Methods: A coronary calcium CT scan with the calculation of ACS and an at rest-transthoracic echocardiogram with ECS evaluation were performed in 81 HeFH patients. Patients were divided into two groups according to the ACS: high-risk ACS patients (High-ACS) with Agatston value > 100 and low risk ACS patients (Low-ACS) with Agatston value ≤ 100. Patients were stratified according to ECS = 0 or ECS > 0. Results: High-ACS patients were older than Low-ACS patients; BMI, waist circumference, and blood systolic pressure were significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in High-ACS patients. The ECS predicted an ACS > 100 with sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.89, accuracy = 0.86, and precision = 0.76. Conclusions: The ECS could be a good surrogate of a coronary calcium CT scan for ACS evaluation in the specific subset of HeFH patients.
ISSN:2075-1729