Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study

Objectives: To compare the influence of type and dimensions of the apical preparation on the cleanliness of the apical area in molars. Material and Methods: A total of 120 root canals (MB and DB root canals from 30 maxillary molars and mesial root canals from 30 mandibular molars) were instrument...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gianluca Plotino, Luigi Tocci, Luca Testarelli, Gianluca Gambarini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology 2014-07-01
Series:eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2014/2/e4/v5n2e4ht.htm
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849245394411716608
author Gianluca Plotino
Luigi Tocci
Luca Testarelli
Gianluca Gambarini
author_facet Gianluca Plotino
Luigi Tocci
Luca Testarelli
Gianluca Gambarini
author_sort Gianluca Plotino
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To compare the influence of type and dimensions of the apical preparation on the cleanliness of the apical area in molars. Material and Methods: A total of 120 root canals (MB and DB root canals from 30 maxillary molars and mesial root canals from 30 mandibular molars) were instrumented with Mtwo NiTi rotary instruments to a size 25/0.06 taper and were equally divided into three different experimental groups depending on the subsequently apical root canal preparation: Group 1: no further apical preparation, Group 2: apical preparation with Mtwo files to a size 40/0.04 taper, Group 3: apical preparation with Mtwo Apical Files. All root canals were observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Presence of superficial debris and smear layer was evaluated using a score system. Data were statistically analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests with a level of significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no differences among groups in the middle and coronal third (P > 0.05), while at the apical level, there was a significant difference for both residual debris and presence of smear layer between Group 1 and both Group 2 (P = 0.003 and P = 0.014) and 3 (P = 0.012 and P = 0.021), while no difference was present between Group 2 and Group 3 (P = 0.871 and P = 0.923). Conclusions: Cleanliness of the apical third in terms of debris and smear layer was statistically better when an apical preparation was performed to a size 40/0.04 taper or with the use of the Mtwo Apical Files.
format Article
id doaj-art-b59852215b914822bbe28f75ed33ddcf
institution Kabale University
issn 2029-283X
language English
publishDate 2014-07-01
publisher Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of Odontology
record_format Article
series eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
spelling doaj-art-b59852215b914822bbe28f75ed33ddcf2025-08-20T03:58:50ZengLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Faculty of OdontologyeJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2014-07-0152e410.5037/jomr.2014.5204Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM StudyGianluca PlotinoLuigi TocciLuca TestarelliGianluca GambariniObjectives: To compare the influence of type and dimensions of the apical preparation on the cleanliness of the apical area in molars. Material and Methods: A total of 120 root canals (MB and DB root canals from 30 maxillary molars and mesial root canals from 30 mandibular molars) were instrumented with Mtwo NiTi rotary instruments to a size 25/0.06 taper and were equally divided into three different experimental groups depending on the subsequently apical root canal preparation: Group 1: no further apical preparation, Group 2: apical preparation with Mtwo files to a size 40/0.04 taper, Group 3: apical preparation with Mtwo Apical Files. All root canals were observed through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Presence of superficial debris and smear layer was evaluated using a score system. Data were statistically analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferroni tests with a level of significance set at P < 0.05. Results: Kruskal-Wallis test revealed no differences among groups in the middle and coronal third (P > 0.05), while at the apical level, there was a significant difference for both residual debris and presence of smear layer between Group 1 and both Group 2 (P = 0.003 and P = 0.014) and 3 (P = 0.012 and P = 0.021), while no difference was present between Group 2 and Group 3 (P = 0.871 and P = 0.923). Conclusions: Cleanliness of the apical third in terms of debris and smear layer was statistically better when an apical preparation was performed to a size 40/0.04 taper or with the use of the Mtwo Apical Files.http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2014/2/e4/v5n2e4ht.htmnickel-titanium alloyroot canal preparationscanning electron microscopy
spellingShingle Gianluca Plotino
Luigi Tocci
Luca Testarelli
Gianluca Gambarini
Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
nickel-titanium alloy
root canal preparation
scanning electron microscopy
title Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study
title_full Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study
title_fullStr Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study
title_short Influence of Different Apical Preparations on Root Canal Cleanliness in Human Molars: a SEM Study
title_sort influence of different apical preparations on root canal cleanliness in human molars a sem study
topic nickel-titanium alloy
root canal preparation
scanning electron microscopy
url http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2014/2/e4/v5n2e4ht.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT gianlucaplotino influenceofdifferentapicalpreparationsonrootcanalcleanlinessinhumanmolarsasemstudy
AT luigitocci influenceofdifferentapicalpreparationsonrootcanalcleanlinessinhumanmolarsasemstudy
AT lucatestarelli influenceofdifferentapicalpreparationsonrootcanalcleanlinessinhumanmolarsasemstudy
AT gianlucagambarini influenceofdifferentapicalpreparationsonrootcanalcleanlinessinhumanmolarsasemstudy