Evidential reasoning, testimonial injustice and the fairness of the criminal trial
The article argues that the assessment of the relevance and of the probative value of an item of evidence is susceptible to an evaluation on moral grounds (such as fairness), rather than just to an evaluation on epistemic grounds (such as accuracy). In particular, the article shows that an assessme...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Federico Picinali |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat de Girona. Cátedra de Cultura Jurídica
2023-09-01
|
| Series: | Quaestio Facti |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22888 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Epistemic Injustice in the Criminal Trial
by: Federico Picinali
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Understanding and preventing testimonial injustice in criminal proceedings
by: Abenaa Owusu-Bempah
Published: (2024-06-01) -
A Critical Perspective on Testimonial Injustice: Interrogating Witnesses' Credibility Excess in Criminal Trials
by: Jasmine Gonzales Rose
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Testimonial Injustice in Evidential Reasoning
by: Rachel Herdy
Published: (2024-06-01) -
Accurate Stereotypes and Testimonial Injustice
by: Leonie Smith
Published: (2025-01-01)