Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study
Purpose. This in vitro study compared root canal preparation in curved mesiobuccal canals of molar teeth using either the One Shape™ or the Neoniti (Neolix) rotary NiTi single-file systems, assessing canal transportation, instrument separation and time required for preparation. Methods. Extracted ma...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Dentistry |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6457071 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850159791176941568 |
|---|---|
| author | Maryam Kuzekanani Faranak Sadeghi Nima Hatami Maryam Rad Mansoureh Darijani Laurence James Walsh |
| author_facet | Maryam Kuzekanani Faranak Sadeghi Nima Hatami Maryam Rad Mansoureh Darijani Laurence James Walsh |
| author_sort | Maryam Kuzekanani |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Purpose. This in vitro study compared root canal preparation in curved mesiobuccal canals of molar teeth using either the One Shape™ or the Neoniti (Neolix) rotary NiTi single-file systems, assessing canal transportation, instrument separation and time required for preparation. Methods. Extracted maxillary and mandibular human molar teeth with mesiobuccal canals having apical angles of curvature between 25 and 35o were selected and embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and an initial CBCT was taken. The teeth were divided into two equal groups (n = 20), and the canals were cleaned and shaped using either Neoniti™ or One Shape™ engine-driven NiTi rotary files. Each individual instrument was used to prepare 5 canals. The time required for the preparation of each canal was recorded. Postpreparation CBCT scans were taken and used to determine the extent of canal transportation at levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm from the apex. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality was applied, and then, datasets were compared using independent t-tests, with a threshold of P<0.05. Results. Neoniti rotary files caused significantly less canal transportation of the curved canals (P=0.0001). On the other hand, the time required for canal preparation was significantly shorter for One Shape (P=0.0001). No instrument separation was recorded in both groups. Conclusion. Based on these results, the Neoniti™ rotary file system is preferred because it maintains the original shape of curved root canals better than One Shape™; even though this benefit comes at the cost of an increase in preparation time in clinical practice, the better technical performance may be more important than a difference in procedural time. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b568bfad1fa94f8e8c87a9211c2a9cb2 |
| institution | OA Journals |
| issn | 1687-8728 1687-8736 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj-art-b568bfad1fa94f8e8c87a9211c2a9cb22025-08-20T02:23:24ZengWileyInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362021-01-01202110.1155/2021/64570716457071Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT StudyMaryam Kuzekanani0Faranak Sadeghi1Nima Hatami2Maryam Rad3Mansoureh Darijani4Laurence James Walsh5Endodontology Research Center, Department of Endodontics, Kerman Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranStudent Research Committee, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences & Health Services, Kerman, IranEndodontology Research Center, Department of Endodontics, Kerman Dental School, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranOral and Dental Diseases Research Center and Kerman Social Determinants on Oral Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, IranDepartment of Oral & Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kerman University of Medical Sciences & Health Services, Kerman, IranUQ Oral Health Centre, The University of Queensland School of Dentistry, 288 Herston Road, Herston 4006, AustraliaPurpose. This in vitro study compared root canal preparation in curved mesiobuccal canals of molar teeth using either the One Shape™ or the Neoniti (Neolix) rotary NiTi single-file systems, assessing canal transportation, instrument separation and time required for preparation. Methods. Extracted maxillary and mandibular human molar teeth with mesiobuccal canals having apical angles of curvature between 25 and 35o were selected and embedded in acrylic resin blocks, and an initial CBCT was taken. The teeth were divided into two equal groups (n = 20), and the canals were cleaned and shaped using either Neoniti™ or One Shape™ engine-driven NiTi rotary files. Each individual instrument was used to prepare 5 canals. The time required for the preparation of each canal was recorded. Postpreparation CBCT scans were taken and used to determine the extent of canal transportation at levels of 2, 4, 6, and 8 mm from the apex. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test for normality was applied, and then, datasets were compared using independent t-tests, with a threshold of P<0.05. Results. Neoniti rotary files caused significantly less canal transportation of the curved canals (P=0.0001). On the other hand, the time required for canal preparation was significantly shorter for One Shape (P=0.0001). No instrument separation was recorded in both groups. Conclusion. Based on these results, the Neoniti™ rotary file system is preferred because it maintains the original shape of curved root canals better than One Shape™; even though this benefit comes at the cost of an increase in preparation time in clinical practice, the better technical performance may be more important than a difference in procedural time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6457071 |
| spellingShingle | Maryam Kuzekanani Faranak Sadeghi Nima Hatami Maryam Rad Mansoureh Darijani Laurence James Walsh Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study International Journal of Dentistry |
| title | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
| title_full | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
| title_short | Comparison of Canal Transportation, Separation Rate, and Preparation Time between One Shape and Neoniti (Neolix): An In Vitro CBCT Study |
| title_sort | comparison of canal transportation separation rate and preparation time between one shape and neoniti neolix an in vitro cbct study |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6457071 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maryamkuzekanani comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT faranaksadeghi comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT nimahatami comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT maryamrad comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT mansourehdarijani comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy AT laurencejameswalsh comparisonofcanaltransportationseparationrateandpreparationtimebetweenoneshapeandneonitineolixaninvitrocbctstudy |