Utility and cost-effectiveness of LiverMultiScan for MASLD diagnosis: a real-world multi-national randomised clinical trial

Abstract Background: Increasing prevalence of metabolic dysfunction–associated liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) poses a growing healthcare burden. Noninvasive diagnostic tools to replace liver biopsy are urgently needed. We investigated the utility an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Shumbayawonda, Marika French, Jane Elizabeth Carolan, Cayden Beyer, Paula Lorgelly, Dimitar Tonev, Rajarshi Banerjee, Michael H. Miller, Christopher D. Byrne, Janisha Patel, Saima Ajaz, Kosh Agarwal, Johanna Backhus, Minneke J. Coenraad, Jelte J. Schaapman, Andrew Fraser, Miguel Castelo Branco, Stephen Barclay, Matthias M. Dollinger, Daniel J. Cuthbertson, Daniel Forton, Hildo J. Lamb
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-03-01
Series:Communications Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-025-00796-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background: Increasing prevalence of metabolic dysfunction–associated liver disease (MASLD) and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis (MASH) poses a growing healthcare burden. Noninvasive diagnostic tools to replace liver biopsy are urgently needed. We investigated the utility and cost-effectiveness of including multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to the management of adults with suspected MASLD multi-nationally. Methods: RADIcAL-1, a 1:1 randomised controlled trial (standard-of-care [SoC] vs. imaging arm [IA; SoC+mpMRI]) included 802 participants from Germany, Netherlands, Portugal and UK. Wilcoxon-rank tests were used to compare access to healthcare practitioners, patient assessments and proportion of patients with a diagnosis (%diagnosis). Liver fat and disease activity (corrected T1 [cT1]) were used to identify patients not requiring biopsy in the imaging arm. Primary endpoint was mpMRI cost-effectiveness and improvement in resource use (visits avoided) using mpMRI. Results: mpMRI is cost-effective with an ICER of €4968/QALY gained. 403 were randomised to IA and 399 to SoC. SoC has significantly more specialist appointments (p = 0.015) and patient assessments (p < 0.001). Across all involved hospitals, %diagnosis is significantly higher in the imaging arm (p = 0.0012). cT1 correctly classifies 50% of patients without MASH with fibrosis and can avoid biopsy. Including all costs, the imaging arm incurs higher short-term per-patient healthcare expenditure compared to the SoC arm (€1,300 vs. €830). Conclusion: Adding mpMRI to SoC for the management of adults with suspected MASLD multi-nationally is cost-effective, enhances rate of diagnosis multi-nationally and increases rate of diagnosis without increasing other liver-related health care resource use. Due to the need for standardisation of SoC, widespread use can support optimisation of the MASLD clinical pathway and improve long-term patient management.
ISSN:2730-664X