« Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcat
The discovery of Sohn-Rethel’s theory of knowledge in 1936 caused Adorno a “great mental shock”. But Adorno’s enthusiasm quickly gave way to Horkheimer’s rejection, as he accused Sohn-Rethel’s genetic approach of being nothing more than idealism in the guise of the ultimate materialist critique. Aga...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Presses universitaires de Strasbourg
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Recherches Germaniques |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/rg/3262 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841547592712847360 |
|---|---|
| author | Salima Naït Ahmed |
| author_facet | Salima Naït Ahmed |
| author_sort | Salima Naït Ahmed |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The discovery of Sohn-Rethel’s theory of knowledge in 1936 caused Adorno a “great mental shock”. But Adorno’s enthusiasm quickly gave way to Horkheimer’s rejection, as he accused Sohn-Rethel’s genetic approach of being nothing more than idealism in the guise of the ultimate materialist critique. Against Horkheimer’s accusations, this article aims to show Sohn-Rethel’s hidden influence on the Dialektik der Aufklärung and more specifically that his reflections help understand the critique of patriarchy. Although Sohn-Rethel is not mentioned, its extension of the materialist and genetic method to the categories of understanding supports the criticism of modern rationality, according to which it is identified with the emergence of male subjectivity. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b541c691fc7244a2b6c6471f11ecd870 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 0399-1989 2649-860X |
| language | deu |
| publishDate | 2020-07-01 |
| publisher | Presses universitaires de Strasbourg |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Recherches Germaniques |
| spelling | doaj-art-b541c691fc7244a2b6c6471f11ecd8702025-01-10T14:28:30ZdeuPresses universitaires de StrasbourgRecherches Germaniques0399-19892649-860X2020-07-0115455410.4000/rg.3262« Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcatSalima Naït AhmedThe discovery of Sohn-Rethel’s theory of knowledge in 1936 caused Adorno a “great mental shock”. But Adorno’s enthusiasm quickly gave way to Horkheimer’s rejection, as he accused Sohn-Rethel’s genetic approach of being nothing more than idealism in the guise of the ultimate materialist critique. Against Horkheimer’s accusations, this article aims to show Sohn-Rethel’s hidden influence on the Dialektik der Aufklärung and more specifically that his reflections help understand the critique of patriarchy. Although Sohn-Rethel is not mentioned, its extension of the materialist and genetic method to the categories of understanding supports the criticism of modern rationality, according to which it is identified with the emergence of male subjectivity.https://journals.openedition.org/rg/3262AdornofeminismSohn-Retheldialectical identificationpatriarchy |
| spellingShingle | Salima Naït Ahmed « Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcat Recherches Germaniques Adorno feminism Sohn-Rethel dialectical identification patriarchy |
| title | « Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcat |
| title_full | « Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcat |
| title_fullStr | « Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcat |
| title_full_unstemmed | « Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcat |
| title_short | « Identification dialectique » et genèse du patriarcat |
| title_sort | identification dialectique et genese du patriarcat |
| topic | Adorno feminism Sohn-Rethel dialectical identification patriarchy |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/rg/3262 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT salimanaitahmed identificationdialectiqueetgenesedupatriarcat |