Retrospective Study 2019–2021 of Antimicrobial Resistance in <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> in Mexicali, Mexico

Retrospective Study 2019–2021 of Antimicrobial Resistance in <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> in Mexicali, Mexico

Community-acquired infections caused by Enterobacterales are a growing public health concern, particularly in border regions where patient mobility may influence resistance patterns. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance is critical for establishing local treatment guidelines. The aim of this...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dolores A. Márquez-Salazar, Ricardo Delgadillo-Valles, Gerson N. Hernández-Acevedo, Edwin Barrios-Villa, Raquel Muñiz-Salazar, Gilberto López-Valencia, Rafael Martínez-Miranda, Jonathan Arauz-Cabrera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-06-01
Series:Microbiology Research
Subjects:
<i>Escherichia coli</i>
<i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>
<i>Proteus mirabilis</i>
community-acquired infection
AMR
ESBLs
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2036-7481/16/6/126
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Community-acquired infections caused by Enterobacterales are a growing public health concern, particularly in border regions where patient mobility may influence resistance patterns. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance is critical for establishing local treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to investigate AMR rates in clinical isolates of <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Klebsiella pneumoniae</i>, and <i>Proteus mirabilis</i> obtained from community-acquired infections in Mexicali between 2019 and 2021. A retrospective study was conducted, analyzing 2871 Enterobacterales isolates (<i>E. coli</i>, <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, <i>P. mirabilis</i>). Species identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using MALDI-TOF and VITEK 2 systems, interpreted according to CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints. ESBL production was detected in 37.6% of <i>E. coli</i>, 27.7% of <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, and none of the <i>P. mirabilis</i> isolates. Among ESBL producers, ciprofloxacin resistance reached 90.4% in <i>E. coli</i> and 81.0% in <i>K. pneumoniae</i>, indicating a significant level of co-resistance. Carbapenem-resistant <i>K. pneumoniae</i> (<i>n</i> = 13) and one <i>E. coli</i> isolate were also identified, all from community-acquired infections. Resistance patterns varied by infection site, with UTIs accounting for the majority of isolates. The high rates of ESBLs and co-resistance to ciprofloxacin among Enterobacterales highlight the urgent need for targeted AMR surveillance and site-specific empirical treatment strategies.
ISSN:2036-7481

Similar Items