Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?

Antitrust enforcement comprises a wide body of rules to control undertakings operating in specific markets. This study examines whether any rethinking of the EU Merger Regulation rules is required to capture transactions escaping antitrust scrutiny, also referred to as “killer acquisitions” where la...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmet Selim Kızılay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Istanbul University Press 2024-08-01
Series:Public and Private International Law Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/09DD22E81E1F4D5B9AFC70F15AD08C77
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850036938102276096
author Ahmet Selim Kızılay
author_facet Ahmet Selim Kızılay
author_sort Ahmet Selim Kızılay
collection DOAJ
description Antitrust enforcement comprises a wide body of rules to control undertakings operating in specific markets. This study examines whether any rethinking of the EU Merger Regulation rules is required to capture transactions escaping antitrust scrutiny, also referred to as “killer acquisitions” where large incumbents buy out innovative start-ups with the principal incentive to pre-empt competition restraint in the future. Existing measures aim to exercise a sort of control for acquisitions that fly under the antitrust radar and fall short of addressing and preventing “killer” intentions occurring in specific product and service markets. It will further call for reform on the approach that competition authorities take while reviewing merger filings to adjust the tools for a better fit to scrutinize such killing strategies which would potentially result in harmful effects to the innovative market structure and eventually to consumer welfare. With the new generation of products in the digital markets, the traditional rules of competition law might fall short of effective solutions. Once given the theoretical background and the measures adopted at the Member State level and recent calls for strengthening competition law tools at the EU level, we aim to demonstrate the inadequacy of the existing rules to address the need for closer scrutiny over the tech giants, i.e., the GAFAM five, and we suggest adapted tools to ensure fair competition.
format Article
id doaj-art-b52fc11ad7b14cbfbfd4ef3a0ddd609b
institution DOAJ
issn 2667-4114
language English
publishDate 2024-08-01
publisher Istanbul University Press
record_format Article
series Public and Private International Law Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-b52fc11ad7b14cbfbfd4ef3a0ddd609b2025-08-20T02:57:00ZengIstanbul University PressPublic and Private International Law Bulletin2667-41142024-08-0144125328010.26650/ppil.2023.44.1.110941123456Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?Ahmet Selim KızılayAntitrust enforcement comprises a wide body of rules to control undertakings operating in specific markets. This study examines whether any rethinking of the EU Merger Regulation rules is required to capture transactions escaping antitrust scrutiny, also referred to as “killer acquisitions” where large incumbents buy out innovative start-ups with the principal incentive to pre-empt competition restraint in the future. Existing measures aim to exercise a sort of control for acquisitions that fly under the antitrust radar and fall short of addressing and preventing “killer” intentions occurring in specific product and service markets. It will further call for reform on the approach that competition authorities take while reviewing merger filings to adjust the tools for a better fit to scrutinize such killing strategies which would potentially result in harmful effects to the innovative market structure and eventually to consumer welfare. With the new generation of products in the digital markets, the traditional rules of competition law might fall short of effective solutions. Once given the theoretical background and the measures adopted at the Member State level and recent calls for strengthening competition law tools at the EU level, we aim to demonstrate the inadequacy of the existing rules to address the need for closer scrutiny over the tech giants, i.e., the GAFAM five, and we suggest adapted tools to ensure fair competition.https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/09DD22E81E1F4D5B9AFC70F15AD08C77killer acquisitionsbig techmergers & acquisitionseuropean union merger regulation (eumr)
spellingShingle Ahmet Selim Kızılay
Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?
Public and Private International Law Bulletin
killer acquisitions
big tech
mergers & acquisitions
european union merger regulation (eumr)
title Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?
title_full Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?
title_fullStr Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?
title_full_unstemmed Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?
title_short Lack of Effective Control on Killer Acquisitions in the Big Tech Market under EU Framework: Rethinking of EUMR Rules?
title_sort lack of effective control on killer acquisitions in the big tech market under eu framework rethinking of eumr rules
topic killer acquisitions
big tech
mergers & acquisitions
european union merger regulation (eumr)
url https://cdn.istanbul.edu.tr/file/JTA6CLJ8T5/09DD22E81E1F4D5B9AFC70F15AD08C77
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmetselimkızılay lackofeffectivecontrolonkilleracquisitionsinthebigtechmarketundereuframeworkrethinkingofeumrrules