Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora

Summary Societal Impact Statement Novel phylogenetic approaches have emerged in recent years to study traditional medicinal plants, aiming to identify potential sources of new drugs. This line of research holds considerable promise yet remains in its early stages. Here, we examine the prevalent meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darío Atienza‐Barthelemy, Manuel J. Macía, Rafael Molina‐Venegas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-05-01
Series:Plants, People, Planet
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10594
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849310548838055936
author Darío Atienza‐Barthelemy
Manuel J. Macía
Rafael Molina‐Venegas
author_facet Darío Atienza‐Barthelemy
Manuel J. Macía
Rafael Molina‐Venegas
author_sort Darío Atienza‐Barthelemy
collection DOAJ
description Summary Societal Impact Statement Novel phylogenetic approaches have emerged in recent years to study traditional medicinal plants, aiming to identify potential sources of new drugs. This line of research holds considerable promise yet remains in its early stages. Here, we examine the prevalent methods employed in the field, revealing the impact of methodological choices that have often been made arbitrarily. We also highlight a widespread misconception regarding ‘hot node analysis’, a tool gaining popularity for identifying plants with high bioactive potential. Our findings should advance future research aimed at guiding the selection of promising candidates for bioprospection. Summary Advances in phylogenetics offer a ground‐breaking approach to analysing ethnobotanical data. This line of research typically involves calculating the degree of phylogenetic clustering (i.e. phylogenetic divergence) of a set of medicinal plants and identifying clades with a significant overabundance of these plants, known as hot nodes, which are purportedly responsible for the clustering patterns. However, despite showing great promise, the adequacy of this procedure remains to be tested, and the results have so far been inconclusive and, at times, contradictory. Here, we examine two key elements through a case study of Ecuadorian medicinal flora: the impact of taxonomic resolution (species‐ and genus‐level data) on phylogenetic divergence metrics (Mean Pairwise Distance; MPD, and Mean Nearest Taxon Distance; MNTD), and the efficacy of the hot node analysis in identifying clades that significantly influence these metrics. To identify clades with a significant impact on MPD and MNTD, we implemented a jackknifing procedure and compared outcomes with the hot nodes. Phylogenetic divergence was strongly dependent on the taxonomic resolution, with clustering mainly revealed by MPD at the genus level. Further, the hot nodes incompletely matched those with significant influence on MPD and MNTD according to the jackknifing analysis. We highlight the impact of taxonomic resolution on commonly used phylogenetic divergence metrics and the limitations of hot nodes in identifying influential clades, stressing the potential of alternative jackknifing techniques. We recommend the use of the most resolved tree possible and combining jackknifing with hot node analyses as complementary sources to pinpoint clades for bioprospection.
format Article
id doaj-art-b4efa50e06ad4e0d81cc6fe3af355e90
institution Kabale University
issn 2572-2611
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Plants, People, Planet
spelling doaj-art-b4efa50e06ad4e0d81cc6fe3af355e902025-08-20T03:53:42ZengWileyPlants, People, Planet2572-26112025-05-017364465310.1002/ppp3.10594Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal floraDarío Atienza‐Barthelemy0Manuel J. Macía1Rafael Molina‐Venegas2Departamento de Biología, Área de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid SpainDepartamento de Biología, Área de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid SpainCentro de Investigación en Biodiversidad y Cambio Global (CIBC‐UAM) Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Madrid SpainSummary Societal Impact Statement Novel phylogenetic approaches have emerged in recent years to study traditional medicinal plants, aiming to identify potential sources of new drugs. This line of research holds considerable promise yet remains in its early stages. Here, we examine the prevalent methods employed in the field, revealing the impact of methodological choices that have often been made arbitrarily. We also highlight a widespread misconception regarding ‘hot node analysis’, a tool gaining popularity for identifying plants with high bioactive potential. Our findings should advance future research aimed at guiding the selection of promising candidates for bioprospection. Summary Advances in phylogenetics offer a ground‐breaking approach to analysing ethnobotanical data. This line of research typically involves calculating the degree of phylogenetic clustering (i.e. phylogenetic divergence) of a set of medicinal plants and identifying clades with a significant overabundance of these plants, known as hot nodes, which are purportedly responsible for the clustering patterns. However, despite showing great promise, the adequacy of this procedure remains to be tested, and the results have so far been inconclusive and, at times, contradictory. Here, we examine two key elements through a case study of Ecuadorian medicinal flora: the impact of taxonomic resolution (species‐ and genus‐level data) on phylogenetic divergence metrics (Mean Pairwise Distance; MPD, and Mean Nearest Taxon Distance; MNTD), and the efficacy of the hot node analysis in identifying clades that significantly influence these metrics. To identify clades with a significant impact on MPD and MNTD, we implemented a jackknifing procedure and compared outcomes with the hot nodes. Phylogenetic divergence was strongly dependent on the taxonomic resolution, with clustering mainly revealed by MPD at the genus level. Further, the hot nodes incompletely matched those with significant influence on MPD and MNTD according to the jackknifing analysis. We highlight the impact of taxonomic resolution on commonly used phylogenetic divergence metrics and the limitations of hot nodes in identifying influential clades, stressing the potential of alternative jackknifing techniques. We recommend the use of the most resolved tree possible and combining jackknifing with hot node analyses as complementary sources to pinpoint clades for bioprospection.https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10594bioprospectingeco‐phylogeneticsethnobotanymedicinal plantsphylogenetic methodsphylogenetic structure
spellingShingle Darío Atienza‐Barthelemy
Manuel J. Macía
Rafael Molina‐Venegas
Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora
Plants, People, Planet
bioprospecting
eco‐phylogenetics
ethnobotany
medicinal plants
phylogenetic methods
phylogenetic structure
title Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora
title_full Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora
title_fullStr Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora
title_full_unstemmed Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora
title_short Hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns: A case study on Ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora
title_sort hot node limitations and impact of taxonomic resolution on phylogenetic divergence patterns a case study on ecuadorian ethnomedicinal flora
topic bioprospecting
eco‐phylogenetics
ethnobotany
medicinal plants
phylogenetic methods
phylogenetic structure
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10594
work_keys_str_mv AT darioatienzabarthelemy hotnodelimitationsandimpactoftaxonomicresolutiononphylogeneticdivergencepatternsacasestudyonecuadorianethnomedicinalflora
AT manueljmacia hotnodelimitationsandimpactoftaxonomicresolutiononphylogeneticdivergencepatternsacasestudyonecuadorianethnomedicinalflora
AT rafaelmolinavenegas hotnodelimitationsandimpactoftaxonomicresolutiononphylogeneticdivergencepatternsacasestudyonecuadorianethnomedicinalflora