Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience

Background. Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 4–15 months. Despite new insights into the genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfactory systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking. The study results of innovativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vidhya Karivedu, Ihab Eldessouki, Ahmad Taftaf, Zheng Zhu, Abouelmagd Makramalla, Nagla Abdel Karim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Oncological Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3560640
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850159543580884992
author Vidhya Karivedu
Ihab Eldessouki
Ahmad Taftaf
Zheng Zhu
Abouelmagd Makramalla
Nagla Abdel Karim
author_facet Vidhya Karivedu
Ihab Eldessouki
Ahmad Taftaf
Zheng Zhu
Abouelmagd Makramalla
Nagla Abdel Karim
author_sort Vidhya Karivedu
collection DOAJ
description Background. Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 4–15 months. Despite new insights into the genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfactory systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking. The study results of innovative treatment strategies are urgently needed. Patients and Methods. This was a retrospective case series of 8 patients with MUM managed at the University of Cincinnati between January 2015 and January 2018. The immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) 1.1 criteria were used for patient evaluation, and magnetic resonance imaging was used for evaluation at treatment checkpoints. Objective. To assess the clinical outcome of patients with MUM treated with a combination of checkpoint inhibitors. Results. The series included eight patients, six men and two women, with MUM. Their median age at MUM diagnosis was 69 (range, 55–77) years. All patients were treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination along with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), followed by nivolumab maintenance and monthly TACE procedures. The majority of patients had a partial response or stable disease. Two of the patients had partial response, while four others had stable disease. Two other patients experienced disease progression. Conclusion. We report the outcomes of eight patients with MUM treated with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. We report the clinical outcome and toxicity associated with this treatment approach. Further studies are warranted to explore immunotherapy in MUM. These findings support the consideration of immunotherapy in MUM.
format Article
id doaj-art-b4ac473e1dbc42fb9545e3cf892ec2d2
institution OA Journals
issn 2090-6706
2090-6714
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Case Reports in Oncological Medicine
spelling doaj-art-b4ac473e1dbc42fb9545e3cf892ec2d22025-08-20T02:23:30ZengWileyCase Reports in Oncological Medicine2090-67062090-67142019-01-01201910.1155/2019/35606403560640Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center ExperienceVidhya Karivedu0Ihab Eldessouki1Ahmad Taftaf2Zheng Zhu3Abouelmagd Makramalla4Nagla Abdel Karim5Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USADepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USADivision of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USADepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical College of Georgia-Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USABackground. Metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM) is associated with a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival (OS) of 4–15 months. Despite new insights into the genetic and molecular background of MUM, satisfactory systemic treatment approaches are currently lacking. The study results of innovative treatment strategies are urgently needed. Patients and Methods. This was a retrospective case series of 8 patients with MUM managed at the University of Cincinnati between January 2015 and January 2018. The immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (irRECIST) 1.1 criteria were used for patient evaluation, and magnetic resonance imaging was used for evaluation at treatment checkpoints. Objective. To assess the clinical outcome of patients with MUM treated with a combination of checkpoint inhibitors. Results. The series included eight patients, six men and two women, with MUM. Their median age at MUM diagnosis was 69 (range, 55–77) years. All patients were treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination along with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), followed by nivolumab maintenance and monthly TACE procedures. The majority of patients had a partial response or stable disease. Two of the patients had partial response, while four others had stable disease. Two other patients experienced disease progression. Conclusion. We report the outcomes of eight patients with MUM treated with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab. We report the clinical outcome and toxicity associated with this treatment approach. Further studies are warranted to explore immunotherapy in MUM. These findings support the consideration of immunotherapy in MUM.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3560640
spellingShingle Vidhya Karivedu
Ihab Eldessouki
Ahmad Taftaf
Zheng Zhu
Abouelmagd Makramalla
Nagla Abdel Karim
Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
Case Reports in Oncological Medicine
title Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in the Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort nivolumab and ipilimumab in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma a single center experience
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/3560640
work_keys_str_mv AT vidhyakarivedu nivolumabandipilimumabinthetreatmentofmetastaticuvealmelanomaasinglecenterexperience
AT ihabeldessouki nivolumabandipilimumabinthetreatmentofmetastaticuvealmelanomaasinglecenterexperience
AT ahmadtaftaf nivolumabandipilimumabinthetreatmentofmetastaticuvealmelanomaasinglecenterexperience
AT zhengzhu nivolumabandipilimumabinthetreatmentofmetastaticuvealmelanomaasinglecenterexperience
AT abouelmagdmakramalla nivolumabandipilimumabinthetreatmentofmetastaticuvealmelanomaasinglecenterexperience
AT naglaabdelkarim nivolumabandipilimumabinthetreatmentofmetastaticuvealmelanomaasinglecenterexperience