Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment

Abstract Background Practicing functional upper-extremity tasks with manual self-assistance may promote motor recovery and restore voluntary control to an impaired limb, reducing reliance on external aid. However, most evidence comes from studies involving tasks with limited coordinative demands. In...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Manczurowsky, Henry Mayne, David Nguyen, Meghan Kenney, John Peter Whitney, Christopher J. Hasson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01696-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849766622613471232
author Julia Manczurowsky
Henry Mayne
David Nguyen
Meghan Kenney
John Peter Whitney
Christopher J. Hasson
author_facet Julia Manczurowsky
Henry Mayne
David Nguyen
Meghan Kenney
John Peter Whitney
Christopher J. Hasson
author_sort Julia Manczurowsky
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Practicing functional upper-extremity tasks with manual self-assistance may promote motor recovery and restore voluntary control to an impaired limb, reducing reliance on external aid. However, most evidence comes from studies involving tasks with limited coordinative demands. In a functional task like reaching for and lifting an object, learning to generate coordinated assistive forces with an external device may pose bilateral sensorimotor challenges that limit motor learning in the impaired limb. To address this question, we developed a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton (hEXO) that enables self-assistance and paired it with an artificial impairment paradigm using Dysfunctional Electrical Stimulation (DFES), which induces involuntary hand closure during reaching. Methods Twenty neurologically typical adults (26 ± 3 yrs) performed a reach-to-grasp and object lift task under challenging sensorimotor conditions: as fast as possible with their non-dominant hand while experiencing an artificial impairment induced by DFES. The stimulation functionally mimicked deficits related to a flexion synergy after neurological injury by making it difficult for participants to extend their fingers while reaching for an object. Experiment 1 assessed the short-term effects of DFES and wearing the hEXO. In Experiment 2, participants were randomly assigned to either a group that could self-assist with the hEXO (n = 10) or a control group that could not self-assist (n = 10) to investigate adaptation to self-assistance and transfer of motor performance to unassisted conditions. Results DFES created a sensorimotor challenge and increased reach-to-grasp time by about 50% during early exposure. The self-assist group improved their reach-to-grasp times faster than controls (p = 0.008), achieved comparable reaching times (p = 0.060), and had a slightly higher incidence of unsuccessful attempts (about one in 20 attempts; p < 0.001). Reach-to-grasp performance did not decline following the removal of self-assistance, indicating no performance dependency. Both groups had similar movement times and success rates in the final unassisted practice block. Conclusions In this sample of adults with an artificial impairment, self-assistance using a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton accelerated motor performance improvements without creating a dependency on the assistance. If replicated in clinical populations, this approach may help promote upper-limb functional independence.
format Article
id doaj-art-b48667f116d54b0abec0f3b77fb6f503
institution DOAJ
issn 1743-0003
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
spelling doaj-art-b48667f116d54b0abec0f3b77fb6f5032025-08-20T03:04:30ZengBMCJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation1743-00032025-07-0122112510.1186/s12984-025-01696-8Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairmentJulia Manczurowsky0Henry Mayne1David Nguyen2Meghan Kenney3John Peter Whitney4Christopher J. Hasson5Department of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern UniversityDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Northeastern UniversityDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern UniversityDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of ConnecticutDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern UniversityDepartment of Physical Therapy, Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern UniversityAbstract Background Practicing functional upper-extremity tasks with manual self-assistance may promote motor recovery and restore voluntary control to an impaired limb, reducing reliance on external aid. However, most evidence comes from studies involving tasks with limited coordinative demands. In a functional task like reaching for and lifting an object, learning to generate coordinated assistive forces with an external device may pose bilateral sensorimotor challenges that limit motor learning in the impaired limb. To address this question, we developed a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton (hEXO) that enables self-assistance and paired it with an artificial impairment paradigm using Dysfunctional Electrical Stimulation (DFES), which induces involuntary hand closure during reaching. Methods Twenty neurologically typical adults (26 ± 3 yrs) performed a reach-to-grasp and object lift task under challenging sensorimotor conditions: as fast as possible with their non-dominant hand while experiencing an artificial impairment induced by DFES. The stimulation functionally mimicked deficits related to a flexion synergy after neurological injury by making it difficult for participants to extend their fingers while reaching for an object. Experiment 1 assessed the short-term effects of DFES and wearing the hEXO. In Experiment 2, participants were randomly assigned to either a group that could self-assist with the hEXO (n = 10) or a control group that could not self-assist (n = 10) to investigate adaptation to self-assistance and transfer of motor performance to unassisted conditions. Results DFES created a sensorimotor challenge and increased reach-to-grasp time by about 50% during early exposure. The self-assist group improved their reach-to-grasp times faster than controls (p = 0.008), achieved comparable reaching times (p = 0.060), and had a slightly higher incidence of unsuccessful attempts (about one in 20 attempts; p < 0.001). Reach-to-grasp performance did not decline following the removal of self-assistance, indicating no performance dependency. Both groups had similar movement times and success rates in the final unassisted practice block. Conclusions In this sample of adults with an artificial impairment, self-assistance using a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton accelerated motor performance improvements without creating a dependency on the assistance. If replicated in clinical populations, this approach may help promote upper-limb functional independence.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01696-8
spellingShingle Julia Manczurowsky
Henry Mayne
David Nguyen
Meghan Kenney
John Peter Whitney
Christopher J. Hasson
Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
title Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment
title_full Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment
title_fullStr Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment
title_short Evaluating self-assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment
title_sort evaluating self assistance during functional reach with a passive hydrostatic exoskeleton under artificial impairment
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01696-8
work_keys_str_mv AT juliamanczurowsky evaluatingselfassistanceduringfunctionalreachwithapassivehydrostaticexoskeletonunderartificialimpairment
AT henrymayne evaluatingselfassistanceduringfunctionalreachwithapassivehydrostaticexoskeletonunderartificialimpairment
AT davidnguyen evaluatingselfassistanceduringfunctionalreachwithapassivehydrostaticexoskeletonunderartificialimpairment
AT meghankenney evaluatingselfassistanceduringfunctionalreachwithapassivehydrostaticexoskeletonunderartificialimpairment
AT johnpeterwhitney evaluatingselfassistanceduringfunctionalreachwithapassivehydrostaticexoskeletonunderartificialimpairment
AT christopherjhasson evaluatingselfassistanceduringfunctionalreachwithapassivehydrostaticexoskeletonunderartificialimpairment