Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought Vulnerability

Abstract Understanding tree transpiration variability is vital for assessing ecosystem water‐use efficiency and forest health amid climate change, yet most landscape‐level measurements do not differentiate individual trees. Using canopy temperature data from thermal cameras, we estimated the transpi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mostafa Javadian, Donald M. Aubrecht, Joshua B. Fisher, Russell L. Scott, Sean P. Burns, Jen L. Diehl, J. William Munger, Andrew D. Richardson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-10-01
Series:Geophysical Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111479
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846170926376288256
author Mostafa Javadian
Donald M. Aubrecht
Joshua B. Fisher
Russell L. Scott
Sean P. Burns
Jen L. Diehl
J. William Munger
Andrew D. Richardson
author_facet Mostafa Javadian
Donald M. Aubrecht
Joshua B. Fisher
Russell L. Scott
Sean P. Burns
Jen L. Diehl
J. William Munger
Andrew D. Richardson
author_sort Mostafa Javadian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Understanding tree transpiration variability is vital for assessing ecosystem water‐use efficiency and forest health amid climate change, yet most landscape‐level measurements do not differentiate individual trees. Using canopy temperature data from thermal cameras, we estimated the transpiration rates of individual trees at Harvard Forest and Niwot Ridge. PT‐JPL model was used to derive latent heat flux from thermal images at the canopy‐level, showing strong agreement with tower measurements (R2 = 0.70–0.96 at Niwot, 0.59–0.78 at Harvard at half‐hourly to monthly scales) and daily RMSE of 33.5 W/m2 (Niwot) and 52.8 W/m2 (Harvard). Tree‐level analysis revealed species‐specific responses to drought, with lodgepole pine exhibiting greater tolerance than Engelmann spruce at Niwot and red oak showing heightened resistance than red maple at Harvard. These findings show how ecophysiological differences between species result in varying responses to drought and demonstrate that these responses can be characterized by deriving transpiration from crown temperature measurements.
format Article
id doaj-art-b45b654b5a6748e7b7f29d4f52b0ada6
institution Kabale University
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language English
publishDate 2024-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geophysical Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-b45b654b5a6748e7b7f29d4f52b0ada62024-11-11T10:10:52ZengWileyGeophysical Research Letters0094-82761944-80072024-10-015120n/an/a10.1029/2024GL111479Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought VulnerabilityMostafa Javadian0Donald M. Aubrecht1Joshua B. Fisher2Russell L. Scott3Sean P. Burns4Jen L. Diehl5J. William Munger6Andrew D. Richardson7Center for Ecosystem Science and Society (ECOSS) Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ USAIndependent Researcher Flagstaff AZ USASchmid College of Science and Technology Chapman University Orange CA USASouthwest Watershed Research Center USDA Agricultural Research Service Tucson AZ USADepartment of Geography University of Colorado Boulder Boulder CO USACenter for Ecosystem Science and Society (ECOSS) Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ USASchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences Harvard University Cambridge MA USACenter for Ecosystem Science and Society (ECOSS) Northern Arizona University Flagstaff AZ USAAbstract Understanding tree transpiration variability is vital for assessing ecosystem water‐use efficiency and forest health amid climate change, yet most landscape‐level measurements do not differentiate individual trees. Using canopy temperature data from thermal cameras, we estimated the transpiration rates of individual trees at Harvard Forest and Niwot Ridge. PT‐JPL model was used to derive latent heat flux from thermal images at the canopy‐level, showing strong agreement with tower measurements (R2 = 0.70–0.96 at Niwot, 0.59–0.78 at Harvard at half‐hourly to monthly scales) and daily RMSE of 33.5 W/m2 (Niwot) and 52.8 W/m2 (Harvard). Tree‐level analysis revealed species‐specific responses to drought, with lodgepole pine exhibiting greater tolerance than Engelmann spruce at Niwot and red oak showing heightened resistance than red maple at Harvard. These findings show how ecophysiological differences between species result in varying responses to drought and demonstrate that these responses can be characterized by deriving transpiration from crown temperature measurements.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111479thermal cameracanopy temperaturetranspirationindividual treePT‐JPLdrought
spellingShingle Mostafa Javadian
Donald M. Aubrecht
Joshua B. Fisher
Russell L. Scott
Sean P. Burns
Jen L. Diehl
J. William Munger
Andrew D. Richardson
Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought Vulnerability
Geophysical Research Letters
thermal camera
canopy temperature
transpiration
individual tree
PT‐JPL
drought
title Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought Vulnerability
title_full Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought Vulnerability
title_fullStr Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought Vulnerability
title_full_unstemmed Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought Vulnerability
title_short Scaling Individual Tree Transpiration With Thermal Cameras Reveals Interspecies Differences to Drought Vulnerability
title_sort scaling individual tree transpiration with thermal cameras reveals interspecies differences to drought vulnerability
topic thermal camera
canopy temperature
transpiration
individual tree
PT‐JPL
drought
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111479
work_keys_str_mv AT mostafajavadian scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability
AT donaldmaubrecht scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability
AT joshuabfisher scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability
AT russelllscott scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability
AT seanpburns scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability
AT jenldiehl scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability
AT jwilliammunger scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability
AT andrewdrichardson scalingindividualtreetranspirationwiththermalcamerasrevealsinterspeciesdifferencestodroughtvulnerability