Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntax

This study provides a novel look at do so replacement within the framework of the Bare Phrase Structure theory. Unlike the previous view of do so as a monolithic VP anaphor, I argue that do so is better analyzed as do and so, separately substituting for a functional Voice head and VP, respectively....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yuji Shuhama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2022-12-01
Series:LingBaW
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/14964
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832592741031215104
author Yuji Shuhama
author_facet Yuji Shuhama
author_sort Yuji Shuhama
collection DOAJ
description This study provides a novel look at do so replacement within the framework of the Bare Phrase Structure theory. Unlike the previous view of do so as a monolithic VP anaphor, I argue that do so is better analyzed as do and so, separately substituting for a functional Voice head and VP, respectively. This argument is supported by the observation of VP adverbs, the locative/directional interpretation of PPs, and the analysis of voice mismatch. The study consequently presents a more refined model of VP than the previous X-bar theoretic model, as it fulfills the structural requirement between complements and adjuncts.
format Article
id doaj-art-b44b0672f89945549fd2f46e8b8153f5
institution Kabale University
issn 2450-5188
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series LingBaW
spelling doaj-art-b44b0672f89945549fd2f46e8b8153f52025-01-21T05:13:43ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinLingBaW2450-51882022-12-01810.31743/lingbaw.14964Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntaxYuji Shuhama0Keiwa College, Shibata This study provides a novel look at do so replacement within the framework of the Bare Phrase Structure theory. Unlike the previous view of do so as a monolithic VP anaphor, I argue that do so is better analyzed as do and so, separately substituting for a functional Voice head and VP, respectively. This argument is supported by the observation of VP adverbs, the locative/directional interpretation of PPs, and the analysis of voice mismatch. The study consequently presents a more refined model of VP than the previous X-bar theoretic model, as it fulfills the structural requirement between complements and adjuncts. https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/14964do soMergelocative/directional PPsvoice mismatch
spellingShingle Yuji Shuhama
Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntax
LingBaW
do so
Merge
locative/directional PPs
voice mismatch
title Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntax
title_full Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntax
title_fullStr Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntax
title_full_unstemmed Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntax
title_short Do so replacement and the argument/adjunct distinction in Merge-based syntax
title_sort do so replacement and the argument adjunct distinction in merge based syntax
topic do so
Merge
locative/directional PPs
voice mismatch
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/LingBaW/article/view/14964
work_keys_str_mv AT yujishuhama dosoreplacementandtheargumentadjunctdistinctioninmergebasedsyntax