Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in apples

In Washington State (U.S.) apple production, adoption of augmentative releases of commercially-reared lacewings for aphid management is increasing, likely due to expanding organic acreage and a lack of effective chemical options. To address the lack of research-based best practice recommendations fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca A. Schmidt-Jeffris, Erica A. Moretti, Daniel Hausler, Katherine L. Taylor, Bonnie J. Ohler, Hayden Tempest, W. Rodney Cooper
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-09-01
Series:Biological Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964425001434
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849405616639967232
author Rebecca A. Schmidt-Jeffris
Erica A. Moretti
Daniel Hausler
Katherine L. Taylor
Bonnie J. Ohler
Hayden Tempest
W. Rodney Cooper
author_facet Rebecca A. Schmidt-Jeffris
Erica A. Moretti
Daniel Hausler
Katherine L. Taylor
Bonnie J. Ohler
Hayden Tempest
W. Rodney Cooper
author_sort Rebecca A. Schmidt-Jeffris
collection DOAJ
description In Washington State (U.S.) apple production, adoption of augmentative releases of commercially-reared lacewings for aphid management is increasing, likely due to expanding organic acreage and a lack of effective chemical options. To address the lack of research-based best practice recommendations for this crop, we compared releases of different lacewing species (Chrysoperla rufilabris, C. plorabunda, C. carnea), life stages (eggs versus larvae), and release methods (sprinkling by hand, egg cards, drone dispersal) for aphid suppression and lacewing survival. Pest and intraguild prey consumption in the field was examined with molecular gut content analysis, using both universal and species-specific primers. In 2021, one hand release of C. plorabunda eggs or C. rufilabris larvae reduced aphid populations by ∼50 % compared to the control, but a release of C. carnea larvae or C. rufilabris eggs did not. In 2022–2023, none of the release treatments decreased aphid abundance, likely because initial aphid numbers were much higher. Recovery of released lacewings was also low in 2023, potentially due to pesticide applications. The highest lacewing larvae recapture rates occurred in the egg card and hand-released larvae treatments; larvae recaptured from these treatments also more frequently tested positive for pest aphid DNA. We found no evidence that lacewing larvae consume other orchard predators. Our initial results indicate that lacewing releases may substantially reduce aphid abundance, but release efficacy is highly dependent on release method, life stage, and timing. Early season releases at the first sign of aphids appear to be particularly critical for success.
format Article
id doaj-art-b42195cc4ec4417ca8bd76bd9fd0c607
institution Kabale University
issn 1049-9644
language English
publishDate 2025-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Biological Control
spelling doaj-art-b42195cc4ec4417ca8bd76bd9fd0c6072025-08-20T03:36:37ZengElsevierBiological Control1049-96442025-09-0120810583310.1016/j.biocontrol.2025.105833Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in applesRebecca A. Schmidt-Jeffris0Erica A. Moretti1Daniel Hausler2Katherine L. Taylor3Bonnie J. Ohler4Hayden Tempest5W. Rodney Cooper6USDA-ARS, Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Crop Research Unit, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, United States; Corresponding author.USDA-ARS, Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Crop Research Unit, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, United StatesUSDA-ARS, Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Crop Research Unit, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, United States; Washington State University, Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 N Western Ave, Wenatchee, WA 98801, United StatesHofstra University, Department of Biology, 114 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549-1140, USAUSDA-ARS, Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Crop Research Unit, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, United States; Washington State University Extension, 404 W. Clark Avenue, Pasco, WA 99301, USAHarper Adams University, Centre for Crop and Environmental Science, Agriculture and Environment Department, Newport, Shropshire TF10 8NB, UK; National Institute of Agricultural Botany, New Road, East Malling, Kent ME19 6BJ, UKUSDA-ARS, Temperate Tree Fruit and Vegetable Crop Research Unit, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951, United StatesIn Washington State (U.S.) apple production, adoption of augmentative releases of commercially-reared lacewings for aphid management is increasing, likely due to expanding organic acreage and a lack of effective chemical options. To address the lack of research-based best practice recommendations for this crop, we compared releases of different lacewing species (Chrysoperla rufilabris, C. plorabunda, C. carnea), life stages (eggs versus larvae), and release methods (sprinkling by hand, egg cards, drone dispersal) for aphid suppression and lacewing survival. Pest and intraguild prey consumption in the field was examined with molecular gut content analysis, using both universal and species-specific primers. In 2021, one hand release of C. plorabunda eggs or C. rufilabris larvae reduced aphid populations by ∼50 % compared to the control, but a release of C. carnea larvae or C. rufilabris eggs did not. In 2022–2023, none of the release treatments decreased aphid abundance, likely because initial aphid numbers were much higher. Recovery of released lacewings was also low in 2023, potentially due to pesticide applications. The highest lacewing larvae recapture rates occurred in the egg card and hand-released larvae treatments; larvae recaptured from these treatments also more frequently tested positive for pest aphid DNA. We found no evidence that lacewing larvae consume other orchard predators. Our initial results indicate that lacewing releases may substantially reduce aphid abundance, but release efficacy is highly dependent on release method, life stage, and timing. Early season releases at the first sign of aphids appear to be particularly critical for success.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964425001434ChrysoperlaLacewingBiological controlBeneficial releasesWoolly apple aphidRosy apple aphid
spellingShingle Rebecca A. Schmidt-Jeffris
Erica A. Moretti
Daniel Hausler
Katherine L. Taylor
Bonnie J. Ohler
Hayden Tempest
W. Rodney Cooper
Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in apples
Biological Control
Chrysoperla
Lacewing
Biological control
Beneficial releases
Woolly apple aphid
Rosy apple aphid
title Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in apples
title_full Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in apples
title_fullStr Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in apples
title_full_unstemmed Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in apples
title_short Augmentative releases of insectary-reared lacewings for aphid control in apples
title_sort augmentative releases of insectary reared lacewings for aphid control in apples
topic Chrysoperla
Lacewing
Biological control
Beneficial releases
Woolly apple aphid
Rosy apple aphid
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049964425001434
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccaaschmidtjeffris augmentativereleasesofinsectaryrearedlacewingsforaphidcontrolinapples
AT ericaamoretti augmentativereleasesofinsectaryrearedlacewingsforaphidcontrolinapples
AT danielhausler augmentativereleasesofinsectaryrearedlacewingsforaphidcontrolinapples
AT katherineltaylor augmentativereleasesofinsectaryrearedlacewingsforaphidcontrolinapples
AT bonniejohler augmentativereleasesofinsectaryrearedlacewingsforaphidcontrolinapples
AT haydentempest augmentativereleasesofinsectaryrearedlacewingsforaphidcontrolinapples
AT wrodneycooper augmentativereleasesofinsectaryrearedlacewingsforaphidcontrolinapples