Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis

Objective To compare the effectiveness of hand hygiene using alcohol-based hand sanitiser to soap and water for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and to assess the relationship between the dose of hand hygiene and the number of ARI, influenza-like illness (ILI) or in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tammy Hoffmann, Mina Bakhit, Chris Del Mar, Anna Mae Scott, Natalia Krzyzaniak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2021-08-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e046175.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850166950195363840
author Tammy Hoffmann
Mina Bakhit
Chris Del Mar
Anna Mae Scott
Natalia Krzyzaniak
author_facet Tammy Hoffmann
Mina Bakhit
Chris Del Mar
Anna Mae Scott
Natalia Krzyzaniak
author_sort Tammy Hoffmann
collection DOAJ
description Objective To compare the effectiveness of hand hygiene using alcohol-based hand sanitiser to soap and water for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and to assess the relationship between the dose of hand hygiene and the number of ARI, influenza-like illness (ILI) or influenza events.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and trial registries were searched in April 2020.Inclusion criteria We included randomised controlled trials that compared a community-based hand hygiene intervention (soap and water, or sanitiser) with a control, or trials that compared sanitiser with soap and water, and measured outcomes of ARI, ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza or related consequences.Data extraction and analysis Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts for inclusion and extracted data.Results Eighteen trials were included. When meta-analysed, three trials of soap and water versus control found a non-significant increase in ARI events (risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.93); six trials of sanitiser versus control found a significant reduction in ARI events (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89). When hand hygiene dose was plotted against ARI relative risk, no clear dose–response relationship was observable. Four trials were head-to-head comparisons of sanitiser and soap and water but too heterogeneous to pool: two found a significantly greater reduction in the sanitiser group compared with the soap group and two found no significant difference between the intervention arms.Conclusions Adequately performed hand hygiene, with either soap or sanitiser, reduces the risk of ARI virus transmission; however, direct and indirect evidence suggest sanitiser might be more effective in practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-b41640059dab4f5899f9849dbb9df81d
institution OA Journals
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-b41640059dab4f5899f9849dbb9df81d2025-08-20T02:21:19ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552021-08-0111810.1136/bmjopen-2020-046175Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysisTammy Hoffmann0Mina Bakhit1Chris Del Mar2Anna Mae Scott3Natalia Krzyzaniak4Bond University, Robina, QLD, AustraliaInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, AustraliaInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, AustraliaBond University Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, AustraliaInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, AustraliaObjective To compare the effectiveness of hand hygiene using alcohol-based hand sanitiser to soap and water for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) and to assess the relationship between the dose of hand hygiene and the number of ARI, influenza-like illness (ILI) or influenza events.Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and trial registries were searched in April 2020.Inclusion criteria We included randomised controlled trials that compared a community-based hand hygiene intervention (soap and water, or sanitiser) with a control, or trials that compared sanitiser with soap and water, and measured outcomes of ARI, ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza or related consequences.Data extraction and analysis Two review authors independently screened the titles and abstracts for inclusion and extracted data.Results Eighteen trials were included. When meta-analysed, three trials of soap and water versus control found a non-significant increase in ARI events (risk ratio (RR) 1.23, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.93); six trials of sanitiser versus control found a significant reduction in ARI events (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.89). When hand hygiene dose was plotted against ARI relative risk, no clear dose–response relationship was observable. Four trials were head-to-head comparisons of sanitiser and soap and water but too heterogeneous to pool: two found a significantly greater reduction in the sanitiser group compared with the soap group and two found no significant difference between the intervention arms.Conclusions Adequately performed hand hygiene, with either soap or sanitiser, reduces the risk of ARI virus transmission; however, direct and indirect evidence suggest sanitiser might be more effective in practice.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e046175.full
spellingShingle Tammy Hoffmann
Mina Bakhit
Chris Del Mar
Anna Mae Scott
Natalia Krzyzaniak
Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis
BMJ Open
title Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis
title_full Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis
title_fullStr Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis
title_full_unstemmed Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis
title_short Soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community: a systematic review with meta-analysis and dose–response analysis
title_sort soap versus sanitiser for preventing the transmission of acute respiratory infections in the community a systematic review with meta analysis and dose response analysis
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/8/e046175.full
work_keys_str_mv AT tammyhoffmann soapversussanitiserforpreventingthetransmissionofacuterespiratoryinfectionsinthecommunityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisanddoseresponseanalysis
AT minabakhit soapversussanitiserforpreventingthetransmissionofacuterespiratoryinfectionsinthecommunityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisanddoseresponseanalysis
AT chrisdelmar soapversussanitiserforpreventingthetransmissionofacuterespiratoryinfectionsinthecommunityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisanddoseresponseanalysis
AT annamaescott soapversussanitiserforpreventingthetransmissionofacuterespiratoryinfectionsinthecommunityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisanddoseresponseanalysis
AT nataliakrzyzaniak soapversussanitiserforpreventingthetransmissionofacuterespiratoryinfectionsinthecommunityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisanddoseresponseanalysis