Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term Outcome
ABSTRACT Background Ablation of the cavo‐tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is the standard treatment for typical atrial flutter. High‐power strategies have been described to improve lesion efficacy and durability. Objective To compare the acute success, safety, and long‐term outcomes of two strategies of high...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2025-07-01
|
| Series: | Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70089 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850065632231424000 |
|---|---|
| author | Wael Zaher Lorenzo Marcon Klaus‐Richard Ebinger Antonio Sorgente |
| author_facet | Wael Zaher Lorenzo Marcon Klaus‐Richard Ebinger Antonio Sorgente |
| author_sort | Wael Zaher |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Background Ablation of the cavo‐tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is the standard treatment for typical atrial flutter. High‐power strategies have been described to improve lesion efficacy and durability. Objective To compare the acute success, safety, and long‐term outcomes of two strategies of high‐power CTI ablation using 8‐mm gold‐tip nonirrigated and 4‐mm irrigated‐tip catheters. Methods This single‐center prospective cohort study included 253 patients who underwent CTI ablation. Patients were treated with either an 8‐mm gold‐tip nonirrigated catheter (60 W, ≥ 30 s) or a 4‐mm irrigated catheter (45 W, ≥ 30 s). Procedural outcomes, safety, and long‐term follow‐up data were assessed. Results Using a propensity score matching, 180 patients were yielded with a 1:1 ratio. Acute bidirectional CTI block was achieved in 97.8% of the 4‐mm group and 97.8% of the 8‐mm group (p = 1.000). No major complications were reported. During a median follow‐up of 27.7 ± 20.1 months, freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 93.3% in both groups (log rank p value 0.935). No significant differences were observed in atrial fibrillation incidence, pacemaker implantation, or cardiovascular mortality between the groups. Conclusion High‐power CTI ablation with both 8‐mm gold‐tip nonirrigated and 4‐mm irrigated catheters is highly effective and safe, providing durable outcomes over long‐term follow‐up. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b3cba5020cff4270a69d97d108e4da6d |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1082-720X 1542-474X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-07-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology |
| spelling | doaj-art-b3cba5020cff4270a69d97d108e4da6d2025-08-20T02:48:57ZengWileyAnnals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology1082-720X1542-474X2025-07-01304n/an/a10.1111/anec.70089Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term OutcomeWael Zaher0Lorenzo Marcon1Klaus‐Richard Ebinger2Antonio Sorgente3Department of Cardiology Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA Hornu BelgiumDepartment of Cardiology Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA Hornu BelgiumDepartment of Cardiology Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA Hornu BelgiumDepartment of Cardiology Centre Hospitalier EpiCURA Hornu BelgiumABSTRACT Background Ablation of the cavo‐tricuspid isthmus (CTI) is the standard treatment for typical atrial flutter. High‐power strategies have been described to improve lesion efficacy and durability. Objective To compare the acute success, safety, and long‐term outcomes of two strategies of high‐power CTI ablation using 8‐mm gold‐tip nonirrigated and 4‐mm irrigated‐tip catheters. Methods This single‐center prospective cohort study included 253 patients who underwent CTI ablation. Patients were treated with either an 8‐mm gold‐tip nonirrigated catheter (60 W, ≥ 30 s) or a 4‐mm irrigated catheter (45 W, ≥ 30 s). Procedural outcomes, safety, and long‐term follow‐up data were assessed. Results Using a propensity score matching, 180 patients were yielded with a 1:1 ratio. Acute bidirectional CTI block was achieved in 97.8% of the 4‐mm group and 97.8% of the 8‐mm group (p = 1.000). No major complications were reported. During a median follow‐up of 27.7 ± 20.1 months, freedom from atrial arrhythmia was 93.3% in both groups (log rank p value 0.935). No significant differences were observed in atrial fibrillation incidence, pacemaker implantation, or cardiovascular mortality between the groups. Conclusion High‐power CTI ablation with both 8‐mm gold‐tip nonirrigated and 4‐mm irrigated catheters is highly effective and safe, providing durable outcomes over long‐term follow‐up.https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70089cavo‐tricuspid isthmus ablationhigh‐powertypical flutter |
| spellingShingle | Wael Zaher Lorenzo Marcon Klaus‐Richard Ebinger Antonio Sorgente Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term Outcome Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology cavo‐tricuspid isthmus ablation high‐power typical flutter |
| title | Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term Outcome |
| title_full | Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term Outcome |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term Outcome |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term Outcome |
| title_short | Comparison of Two High‐Power Ablation Strategies for Typical Atrial Flutter: Acute and Long‐Term Outcome |
| title_sort | comparison of two high power ablation strategies for typical atrial flutter acute and long term outcome |
| topic | cavo‐tricuspid isthmus ablation high‐power typical flutter |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1111/anec.70089 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT waelzaher comparisonoftwohighpowerablationstrategiesfortypicalatrialflutteracuteandlongtermoutcome AT lorenzomarcon comparisonoftwohighpowerablationstrategiesfortypicalatrialflutteracuteandlongtermoutcome AT klausrichardebinger comparisonoftwohighpowerablationstrategiesfortypicalatrialflutteracuteandlongtermoutcome AT antoniosorgente comparisonoftwohighpowerablationstrategiesfortypicalatrialflutteracuteandlongtermoutcome |