A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol

Abstract Background Executive functions (EF) are cognitive processes that support goal-directed behaviors that are essential for children’s academic success, predicting school performance more strongly than IQ. However, intervention studies report mixed findings regarding the causal far-transfer eff...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicholas Napolitano, Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona, Jorge Gaete, Ricardo Araya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-07-01
Series:BMC Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03075-3
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849238246629834752
author Nicholas Napolitano
Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona
Jorge Gaete
Ricardo Araya
author_facet Nicholas Napolitano
Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona
Jorge Gaete
Ricardo Araya
author_sort Nicholas Napolitano
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Executive functions (EF) are cognitive processes that support goal-directed behaviors that are essential for children’s academic success, predicting school performance more strongly than IQ. However, intervention studies report mixed findings regarding the causal far-transfer effects to academic skills, such as literacy and mathematics. Age and intervention modality may moderate these effects: younger children may experience greater EF gains due to heightened neuroplasticity, and the format of delivery (digital, traditional, or mixed) could influence engagement and outcomes. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of EF interventions delivered across three modalities and two developmental stages to identify the most effective approach for enhancing both EF and academic performance. Methods A cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted in four municipal schools in Chile. Using a 4 × 2 factorial design, schools will be randomly assigned to one of four conditions: digital, traditional, mixed-modality, or control. Two age groups will be included (5–6 and 9–10 years). Participants (N = 240) will complete 24 intervention sessions over 12 weeks. The intervention is adapted from a previously validated digital platform targeting executive and social-emotional skills. For this study, the activities focus on stimulating working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility. Sessions are gamified and delivered via tablets, physical materials, or a combination of both, depending on condition. Primary outcomes include the three core EF domains, assessed pre- and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include literacy and mathematical skills. Data will be analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) and Linear Mixed Models (LMM) to examine main effects, interactions, and moderating roles of age and modality. Discussion This study will provide key insights into how age and the intervention modality influence EF training outcomes with regard to EF and possibly academic domains. By comparing digital, traditional, and mixed delivery, we aim to identify the most effective and engaging intervention format across developmental stages. Findings may inform scalable, evidence-based educational programs, particularly for vulnerable populations, and serve as a foundation for future large-scale trials to guide best practices in EF intervention research. Trial registration NCT06935656, April 20, 2025 [https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06935656] https//osf.io/9mp83, March 11, 2025.
format Article
id doaj-art-b3c50d34af0c4dc6a92753db243e9c3f
institution Kabale University
issn 2050-7283
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Psychology
spelling doaj-art-b3c50d34af0c4dc6a92753db243e9c3f2025-08-20T04:01:42ZengBMCBMC Psychology2050-72832025-07-0113111110.1186/s40359-025-03075-3A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocolNicholas Napolitano0Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona1Jorge Gaete2Ricardo Araya3Doctorate in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Research Center on Cognitive Sciences, Millenium Nucleus for the Science of Learning, University of TalcaFaculty of Psychology, Research Center on Cognitive Sciences, Millenium Nucleus for the Sciences of Learning, University of TalcaResearch Center for Students Mental Health (ISME), School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Universidad de los AndesDepartment of Health Service & Population Research, David Goldberg Centre, King’s College LondonAbstract Background Executive functions (EF) are cognitive processes that support goal-directed behaviors that are essential for children’s academic success, predicting school performance more strongly than IQ. However, intervention studies report mixed findings regarding the causal far-transfer effects to academic skills, such as literacy and mathematics. Age and intervention modality may moderate these effects: younger children may experience greater EF gains due to heightened neuroplasticity, and the format of delivery (digital, traditional, or mixed) could influence engagement and outcomes. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of EF interventions delivered across three modalities and two developmental stages to identify the most effective approach for enhancing both EF and academic performance. Methods A cluster-randomized controlled trial will be conducted in four municipal schools in Chile. Using a 4 × 2 factorial design, schools will be randomly assigned to one of four conditions: digital, traditional, mixed-modality, or control. Two age groups will be included (5–6 and 9–10 years). Participants (N = 240) will complete 24 intervention sessions over 12 weeks. The intervention is adapted from a previously validated digital platform targeting executive and social-emotional skills. For this study, the activities focus on stimulating working memory, inhibitory control, and cognitive flexibility. Sessions are gamified and delivered via tablets, physical materials, or a combination of both, depending on condition. Primary outcomes include the three core EF domains, assessed pre- and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes include literacy and mathematical skills. Data will be analyzed using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) and Linear Mixed Models (LMM) to examine main effects, interactions, and moderating roles of age and modality. Discussion This study will provide key insights into how age and the intervention modality influence EF training outcomes with regard to EF and possibly academic domains. By comparing digital, traditional, and mixed delivery, we aim to identify the most effective and engaging intervention format across developmental stages. Findings may inform scalable, evidence-based educational programs, particularly for vulnerable populations, and serve as a foundation for future large-scale trials to guide best practices in EF intervention research. Trial registration NCT06935656, April 20, 2025 [https//clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06935656] https//osf.io/9mp83, March 11, 2025.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03075-3Executive functionsFar transferCognitive interventionAcademic performanceSchool children
spellingShingle Nicholas Napolitano
Cristian A. Rojas-Barahona
Jorge Gaete
Ricardo Araya
A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol
BMC Psychology
Executive functions
Far transfer
Cognitive intervention
Academic performance
School children
title A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol
title_full A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol
title_fullStr A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol
title_short A comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in Chilean school children: a cluster-randomized controlled protocol
title_sort comparison of three executive function interventions on direct and far transfer in chilean school children a cluster randomized controlled protocol
topic Executive functions
Far transfer
Cognitive intervention
Academic performance
School children
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03075-3
work_keys_str_mv AT nicholasnapolitano acomparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol
AT cristianarojasbarahona acomparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol
AT jorgegaete acomparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol
AT ricardoaraya acomparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol
AT nicholasnapolitano comparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol
AT cristianarojasbarahona comparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol
AT jorgegaete comparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol
AT ricardoaraya comparisonofthreeexecutivefunctioninterventionsondirectandfartransferinchileanschoolchildrenaclusterrandomizedcontrolledprotocol