Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and India

The limitation that is placed on the institution of legal proceedings is considered as being important for the purposes of ensuring legal certainty. Considering this, the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 has continued to co-exist alongside section 34 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to ac...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tshepiso Scott-Ngoepe
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2025-05-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/16450
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849687766706683904
author Tshepiso Scott-Ngoepe
author_facet Tshepiso Scott-Ngoepe
author_sort Tshepiso Scott-Ngoepe
collection DOAJ
description The limitation that is placed on the institution of legal proceedings is considered as being important for the purposes of ensuring legal certainty. Considering this, the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 has continued to co-exist alongside section 34 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to access redress. The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) also introduces a specific statutory limitation that applies to transactions that fall within its scope. However, the provision is less nuanced and does not consider instances in which prescription might be interrupted. In many instances this has been to the detriment of consumers. In alignment with the CPA's dispute resolution process, consumers generally initiate their complaints with alternative dispute resolution agents, such as the accredited industry ombuds. Alternatively, consumers might refer their matters to the National Consumer Commission. Unfortunately, cases before the Tribunal have exposed the fact that consumers experience inordinate delays that lead to their complaints prescribing in terms of section 116(1) of the CPA. This article considers how this might be remedied, bearing in mind the prescription provision under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 of India.
format Article
id doaj-art-b3a9154da90a425fbd05bf582f9f28da
institution DOAJ
issn 1727-3781
language Afrikaans
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher North-West University
record_format Article
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
spelling doaj-art-b3a9154da90a425fbd05bf582f9f28da2025-08-20T03:22:14ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812025-05-012810.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a16450Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and IndiaTshepiso Scott-Ngoepe0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8058-125XUniversity of Pretoria The limitation that is placed on the institution of legal proceedings is considered as being important for the purposes of ensuring legal certainty. Considering this, the Prescription Act 68 of 1969 has continued to co-exist alongside section 34 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to access redress. The Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008 (CPA) also introduces a specific statutory limitation that applies to transactions that fall within its scope. However, the provision is less nuanced and does not consider instances in which prescription might be interrupted. In many instances this has been to the detriment of consumers. In alignment with the CPA's dispute resolution process, consumers generally initiate their complaints with alternative dispute resolution agents, such as the accredited industry ombuds. Alternatively, consumers might refer their matters to the National Consumer Commission. Unfortunately, cases before the Tribunal have exposed the fact that consumers experience inordinate delays that lead to their complaints prescribing in terms of section 116(1) of the CPA. This article considers how this might be remedied, bearing in mind the prescription provision under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 of India. https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/16450Consumerprescriptionaccess to courtsconsumer dispute resolutionaccess to redresssection 116 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
spellingShingle Tshepiso Scott-Ngoepe
Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and India
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Consumer
prescription
access to courts
consumer dispute resolution
access to redress
section 116 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
title Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and India
title_full Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and India
title_fullStr Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and India
title_full_unstemmed Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and India
title_short Prescription and Access to Redress for Consumers:A Consideration of the Prescription Provisions Under the Consumer Protection Acts of South Africa and India
title_sort prescription and access to redress for consumers a consideration of the prescription provisions under the consumer protection acts of south africa and india
topic Consumer
prescription
access to courts
consumer dispute resolution
access to redress
section 116 of the Consumer Protection Act 68 of 2008
url https://perjournal.co.za/article/view/16450
work_keys_str_mv AT tshepisoscottngoepe prescriptionandaccesstoredressforconsumersaconsiderationoftheprescriptionprovisionsundertheconsumerprotectionactsofsouthafricaandindia