Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law

From a critical review of the literature, we analyze the incompatibility between the possibility of incorporating moral principles to the law and its authoritative nature, as argued by exclusive positivists, such as J. Raz. After presenting his argument in second section, we argue in the third sect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ramiro Ávila Peres
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2019-12-01
Series:Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/60957
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850280731589214208
author Ramiro Ávila Peres
author_facet Ramiro Ávila Peres
author_sort Ramiro Ávila Peres
collection DOAJ
description From a critical review of the literature, we analyze the incompatibility between the possibility of incorporating moral principles to the law and its authoritative nature, as argued by exclusive positivists, such as J. Raz. After presenting his argument in second section, we argue in the third section that it is incompatible with commonly accepted (even by Raz)  premises of the theory of legal interpretation, or else it would lead to contradiction - unless one presupposes, within the premises, a strong version of the sources thesis (which is what Raz intends to prove). In conclusion, we return to the arguments presented, concluding with a possible difficulty for the adoption of exclusive positivism by people inside a legal practice.  
format Article
id doaj-art-b37411832d4a4831bc3e366e279f41fc
institution OA Journals
issn 1677-2954
language English
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
record_format Article
series Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy
spelling doaj-art-b37411832d4a4831bc3e366e279f41fc2025-08-20T01:48:38ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaEthic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy1677-29542019-12-0118310.5007/1677-2954.2019v18n3p31933829Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into LawRamiro Ávila Peres0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9376-2105Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul From a critical review of the literature, we analyze the incompatibility between the possibility of incorporating moral principles to the law and its authoritative nature, as argued by exclusive positivists, such as J. Raz. After presenting his argument in second section, we argue in the third section that it is incompatible with commonly accepted (even by Raz)  premises of the theory of legal interpretation, or else it would lead to contradiction - unless one presupposes, within the premises, a strong version of the sources thesis (which is what Raz intends to prove). In conclusion, we return to the arguments presented, concluding with a possible difficulty for the adoption of exclusive positivism by people inside a legal practice.   https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/60957
spellingShingle Ramiro Ávila Peres
Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law
Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy
title Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law
title_full Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law
title_fullStr Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law
title_full_unstemmed Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law
title_short Interpreting the Claim to Legitimate Authority: an Analysis of Joseph Raz's Objection Against Incorporating Moral Norms into Law
title_sort interpreting the claim to legitimate authority an analysis of joseph raz s objection against incorporating moral norms into law
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ethic/article/view/60957
work_keys_str_mv AT ramiroavilaperes interpretingtheclaimtolegitimateauthorityananalysisofjosephrazsobjectionagainstincorporatingmoralnormsintolaw