Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.

Abstract Background The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) in California is one of the most polluted regions in the U.S. This study examined favorability for air pollution mitigation policies, interventions, and identified predictors amongst region’s residents. Methods A cross-sectional online survey asked ab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez, Paul Brown, Ricardo Cisneros
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21366-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585309426024448
author Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez
Paul Brown
Ricardo Cisneros
author_facet Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez
Paul Brown
Ricardo Cisneros
author_sort Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) in California is one of the most polluted regions in the U.S. This study examined favorability for air pollution mitigation policies, interventions, and identified predictors amongst region’s residents. Methods A cross-sectional online survey asked about health status and conditions, self-protective behaviors, attitudes toward air pollution recommendations, air quality information knowledge and mitigation behaviors, as well as whether their views were favorable or unfavorable towards policy and interventions. EuroQOL-5D-3L was utilized to estimate quality-of-life distribution equity and air pollution policy favorability. Results A total of 310 adults residing in the SJV participated in the survey. The mean age was 42.90 years, with 34% having asthma. People with asthma reported the lowest health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to other air pollution “sensitive” groups. Concerns included the costs, charge and attributes of adopting hybrid or electric vehicles. Residents supported air pollution control and public space preservation, with socioeconomic factors and health state being significant predictors. Left-wing ideologies favor policies charging polluters, controlling emissions, and preserving public spaces, whereas right-wing views negatively predict support for electric vehicle charges and local organization interventions. Conclusions Results may help air pollution control policymakers, public health agencies, environmental justice organizations, and the health equity research community understand the reasons for differential responses to air pollution interventions and mitigation efforts. This new knowledge could assist stakeholders in recommending sustainable and cost-effective interventions for improving air quality, elicit behavior change, and climate change adaptation in the region.
format Article
id doaj-art-b37204c1bcbf41f4924628525392fd89
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2458
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj-art-b37204c1bcbf41f4924628525392fd892025-01-26T12:56:24ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582025-01-0125111910.1186/s12889-025-21366-7Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez0Paul Brown1Ricardo Cisneros2Department of Public Health, University of California, MercedDepartment of Public Health, University of California, MercedDepartment of Public Health, University of California, MercedAbstract Background The San Joaquin Valley (SJV) in California is one of the most polluted regions in the U.S. This study examined favorability for air pollution mitigation policies, interventions, and identified predictors amongst region’s residents. Methods A cross-sectional online survey asked about health status and conditions, self-protective behaviors, attitudes toward air pollution recommendations, air quality information knowledge and mitigation behaviors, as well as whether their views were favorable or unfavorable towards policy and interventions. EuroQOL-5D-3L was utilized to estimate quality-of-life distribution equity and air pollution policy favorability. Results A total of 310 adults residing in the SJV participated in the survey. The mean age was 42.90 years, with 34% having asthma. People with asthma reported the lowest health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to other air pollution “sensitive” groups. Concerns included the costs, charge and attributes of adopting hybrid or electric vehicles. Residents supported air pollution control and public space preservation, with socioeconomic factors and health state being significant predictors. Left-wing ideologies favor policies charging polluters, controlling emissions, and preserving public spaces, whereas right-wing views negatively predict support for electric vehicle charges and local organization interventions. Conclusions Results may help air pollution control policymakers, public health agencies, environmental justice organizations, and the health equity research community understand the reasons for differential responses to air pollution interventions and mitigation efforts. This new knowledge could assist stakeholders in recommending sustainable and cost-effective interventions for improving air quality, elicit behavior change, and climate change adaptation in the region.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21366-7Air pollutionAsthmaQuality-of-lifeEquityPolicyHealth economics
spellingShingle Gilda Zarate-Gonzalez
Paul Brown
Ricardo Cisneros
Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.
BMC Public Health
Air pollution
Asthma
Quality-of-life
Equity
Policy
Health economics
title Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.
title_full Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.
title_fullStr Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.
title_full_unstemmed Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.
title_short Assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies: health, socioeconomic, and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the U.S.
title_sort assessing public support for air pollution mitigation and control policies health socioeconomic and ideological predictors in an overburdened and vulnerable region of the u s
topic Air pollution
Asthma
Quality-of-life
Equity
Policy
Health economics
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21366-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gildazarategonzalez assessingpublicsupportforairpollutionmitigationandcontrolpolicieshealthsocioeconomicandideologicalpredictorsinanoverburdenedandvulnerableregionoftheus
AT paulbrown assessingpublicsupportforairpollutionmitigationandcontrolpolicieshealthsocioeconomicandideologicalpredictorsinanoverburdenedandvulnerableregionoftheus
AT ricardocisneros assessingpublicsupportforairpollutionmitigationandcontrolpolicieshealthsocioeconomicandideologicalpredictorsinanoverburdenedandvulnerableregionoftheus