Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic Results

Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer worldwide, and the incidence is rising. While surgical excision remains the gold standard, it can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Therefore, there is a growing need for simpler and more cost-effective treatmen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pelle Kahr Nilsson, Ulrik Knap, Rasa Laurinaviciene, Sebastian Vigand Svendsen, Tine Vestergaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mattioli1885 2025-07-01
Series:Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/5368
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849739275794382848
author Pelle Kahr Nilsson
Ulrik Knap
Rasa Laurinaviciene
Sebastian Vigand Svendsen
Tine Vestergaard
author_facet Pelle Kahr Nilsson
Ulrik Knap
Rasa Laurinaviciene
Sebastian Vigand Svendsen
Tine Vestergaard
author_sort Pelle Kahr Nilsson
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer worldwide, and the incidence is rising. While surgical excision remains the gold standard, it can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Therefore, there is a growing need for simpler and more cost-effective treatment options for low-risk tumors. Objectives: This study compared the scar quality and the recurrence rate from continuous wave CO2 laser and curettage and electrodesiccation treatments. Scar quality and the recurrence rate from the treatments were assessed. Methods: A single-blind randomized prospective interventional trial was conducted at Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from 2017 to 2023. Patients with histologically confirmed superficial BCC were randomized 1:1 to Curettage-Electrodesiccation (CE) or continuous wave CO2 (CW CO2) laser treatment. Scar quality was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and a modified visual-only scale (VSAS). Recurrence within one year was a secondary outcome. Results: Thirty-two patients were treated for 32 tumors: 17 with CE and 15 with CO2 laser. There was no significant difference in scar quality or recurrence rate between the CE and CO2 laser groups (PSAS: P = 0.422; OSAS: P = 0.747; VSAS: P = 0.522). After one year, neither group showed tumor recurrence. Conclusion: CO2 laser used in continuous wave setting offers a treatment for superficial BCCs with cosmetic outcomes and recurrence rates comparable to CE. However, a larger patient sample and longer follow-up are needed for definitive conclusions.  
format Article
id doaj-art-b3501f99e5084b0b9fb695475be2b76c
institution DOAJ
issn 2160-9381
language English
publishDate 2025-07-01
publisher Mattioli1885
record_format Article
series Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
spelling doaj-art-b3501f99e5084b0b9fb695475be2b76c2025-08-20T03:06:19ZengMattioli1885Dermatology Practical & Conceptual2160-93812025-07-0115310.5826/dpc.1503a5368Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic ResultsPelle Kahr Nilsson0Ulrik Knap1Rasa Laurinaviciene2Sebastian Vigand Svendsen3Tine Vestergaard4Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Dermatology and Allergy CenterOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Dermatology and Allergy CenterOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Dermatology and Allergy CenterOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Dermatology and Allergy CenterOdense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center Introduction: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer worldwide, and the incidence is rising. While surgical excision remains the gold standard, it can be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Therefore, there is a growing need for simpler and more cost-effective treatment options for low-risk tumors. Objectives: This study compared the scar quality and the recurrence rate from continuous wave CO2 laser and curettage and electrodesiccation treatments. Scar quality and the recurrence rate from the treatments were assessed. Methods: A single-blind randomized prospective interventional trial was conducted at Odense University Hospital, Denmark, from 2017 to 2023. Patients with histologically confirmed superficial BCC were randomized 1:1 to Curettage-Electrodesiccation (CE) or continuous wave CO2 (CW CO2) laser treatment. Scar quality was assessed using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and a modified visual-only scale (VSAS). Recurrence within one year was a secondary outcome. Results: Thirty-two patients were treated for 32 tumors: 17 with CE and 15 with CO2 laser. There was no significant difference in scar quality or recurrence rate between the CE and CO2 laser groups (PSAS: P = 0.422; OSAS: P = 0.747; VSAS: P = 0.522). After one year, neither group showed tumor recurrence. Conclusion: CO2 laser used in continuous wave setting offers a treatment for superficial BCCs with cosmetic outcomes and recurrence rates comparable to CE. However, a larger patient sample and longer follow-up are needed for definitive conclusions.   https://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/5368Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer, Co₂ Laser, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Electrodesiccation, Cosmetic Outcome
spellingShingle Pelle Kahr Nilsson
Ulrik Knap
Rasa Laurinaviciene
Sebastian Vigand Svendsen
Tine Vestergaard
Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic Results
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer, Co₂ Laser, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Electrodesiccation, Cosmetic Outcome
title Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic Results
title_full Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic Results
title_fullStr Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic Results
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic Results
title_short Comparative Study of CO₂ Laser and Curettage-Electrodesiccation for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment: A Focus on Cosmetic Results
title_sort comparative study of co₂ laser and curettage electrodesiccation for superficial basal cell carcinoma treatment a focus on cosmetic results
topic Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer, Co₂ Laser, Basal Cell Carcinoma, Electrodesiccation, Cosmetic Outcome
url https://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/5368
work_keys_str_mv AT pellekahrnilsson comparativestudyofco2laserandcurettageelectrodesiccationforsuperficialbasalcellcarcinomatreatmentafocusoncosmeticresults
AT ulrikknap comparativestudyofco2laserandcurettageelectrodesiccationforsuperficialbasalcellcarcinomatreatmentafocusoncosmeticresults
AT rasalaurinaviciene comparativestudyofco2laserandcurettageelectrodesiccationforsuperficialbasalcellcarcinomatreatmentafocusoncosmeticresults
AT sebastianvigandsvendsen comparativestudyofco2laserandcurettageelectrodesiccationforsuperficialbasalcellcarcinomatreatmentafocusoncosmeticresults
AT tinevestergaard comparativestudyofco2laserandcurettageelectrodesiccationforsuperficialbasalcellcarcinomatreatmentafocusoncosmeticresults