The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020

Abstract Background Imbalance in the gut microbiota is a key factor in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and liver fibrosis. The Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) integrates the potential relationship between diet and gut microbiota diversity. This study aims to in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ce Zheng, Zeming Qi, Rui Chen, Zhixiong Liao, Lanfeng Xie, Fumang Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-03-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03756-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849774357496201216
author Ce Zheng
Zeming Qi
Rui Chen
Zhixiong Liao
Lanfeng Xie
Fumang Zhang
author_facet Ce Zheng
Zeming Qi
Rui Chen
Zhixiong Liao
Lanfeng Xie
Fumang Zhang
author_sort Ce Zheng
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Imbalance in the gut microbiota is a key factor in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and liver fibrosis. The Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) integrates the potential relationship between diet and gut microbiota diversity. This study aims to investigate the association between DI-GM and the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis, providing theoretical support for dietary intervention strategies. Methods This study utilized data from NHANES 2017–2020, including 6,181 eligible adult participants. The relationship between DI-GM and the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis was assessed using DI-GM quartiles, multivariate logistic regression, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the predictive role of DI-GM in different populations. All analyses were weighted to ensure the representativeness of the results. Results DI-GM was negatively associated with the risks of NAFLD and liver fibrosis. As DI-GM scores increased, the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis significantly decreased (52.81%, 43.16%, 40.40%, and 31.98%, p < 0.05; 17.52%, 9.04%, 7.21%, and 6.78%, p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, in the unadjusted model (Model 1), for each unit increase in DI-GM, the risk of NAFLD decreased by 6.9% (OR = 0.931, 95% CI: 0.886–0.979, p < 0.001), while the risk of liver fibrosis decreased by 15.6% (OR = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.757–0.941, p < 0.05). In the quartile analysis, individuals in the highest DI-GM quartile (Q4) had a 58% lower risk of NAFLD compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.219–0.806, p < 0.001). The results remained significant even after adjusting for covariates. RCS analysis showed that DI-GM had a nonlinear relationship with the risks of NAFLD and liver fibrosis, with inflection points at scores of 2 and 5, indicating enhanced protective effects. Conclusion This study reveals a negative association between DI-GM and the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis, highlighting the potential role of healthy dietary patterns in the prevention and management of NAFLD and liver fibrosis through gut microbiota modulation, providing a theoretical basis for dietary interventions.
format Article
id doaj-art-b31dae0b924447fdb11ae118fc75b6eb
institution DOAJ
issn 1471-230X
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj-art-b31dae0b924447fdb11ae118fc75b6eb2025-08-20T03:01:43ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2025-03-0125111310.1186/s12876-025-03756-8The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020Ce Zheng0Zeming Qi1Rui Chen2Zhixiong Liao3Lanfeng Xie4Fumang Zhang5Hangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityHangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityHangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityHangzhou TCM Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityTongren Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineThe Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical UniversityAbstract Background Imbalance in the gut microbiota is a key factor in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and liver fibrosis. The Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota (DI-GM) integrates the potential relationship between diet and gut microbiota diversity. This study aims to investigate the association between DI-GM and the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis, providing theoretical support for dietary intervention strategies. Methods This study utilized data from NHANES 2017–2020, including 6,181 eligible adult participants. The relationship between DI-GM and the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis was assessed using DI-GM quartiles, multivariate logistic regression, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis. Subgroup analysis was performed to explore the predictive role of DI-GM in different populations. All analyses were weighted to ensure the representativeness of the results. Results DI-GM was negatively associated with the risks of NAFLD and liver fibrosis. As DI-GM scores increased, the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis significantly decreased (52.81%, 43.16%, 40.40%, and 31.98%, p < 0.05; 17.52%, 9.04%, 7.21%, and 6.78%, p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, in the unadjusted model (Model 1), for each unit increase in DI-GM, the risk of NAFLD decreased by 6.9% (OR = 0.931, 95% CI: 0.886–0.979, p < 0.001), while the risk of liver fibrosis decreased by 15.6% (OR = 0.844, 95% CI: 0.757–0.941, p < 0.05). In the quartile analysis, individuals in the highest DI-GM quartile (Q4) had a 58% lower risk of NAFLD compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1) (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.219–0.806, p < 0.001). The results remained significant even after adjusting for covariates. RCS analysis showed that DI-GM had a nonlinear relationship with the risks of NAFLD and liver fibrosis, with inflection points at scores of 2 and 5, indicating enhanced protective effects. Conclusion This study reveals a negative association between DI-GM and the risk of NAFLD and liver fibrosis, highlighting the potential role of healthy dietary patterns in the prevention and management of NAFLD and liver fibrosis through gut microbiota modulation, providing a theoretical basis for dietary interventions.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03756-8NAFLDDI-GMNHANESGut microbiotaDietary index
spellingShingle Ce Zheng
Zeming Qi
Rui Chen
Zhixiong Liao
Lanfeng Xie
Fumang Zhang
The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020
BMC Gastroenterology
NAFLD
DI-GM
NHANES
Gut microbiota
Dietary index
title The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020
title_full The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020
title_fullStr The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020
title_full_unstemmed The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020
title_short The association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis: evidence from NHANES 2017–2020
title_sort association between the dietary index for gut microbiota and non alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis evidence from nhanes 2017 2020
topic NAFLD
DI-GM
NHANES
Gut microbiota
Dietary index
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-03756-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cezheng theassociationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT zemingqi theassociationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT ruichen theassociationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT zhixiongliao theassociationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT lanfengxie theassociationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT fumangzhang theassociationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT cezheng associationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT zemingqi associationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT ruichen associationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT zhixiongliao associationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT lanfengxie associationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020
AT fumangzhang associationbetweenthedietaryindexforgutmicrobiotaandnonalcoholicfattyliverdiseaseandliverfibrosisevidencefromnhanes20172020