Asking an AI for salary negotiation advice is a matter of concern: Controlled experimental perturbation of ChatGPT for protected and non-protected group discrimination on a contextual task with no clear ground truth answers.
We conducted controlled experimental bias audits for four versions of ChatGPT, which we asked to recommend an opening offer in salary negotiations for a new hire. We submitted 98,800 prompts to each version, systematically varying the employee's gender, university, and major, and tested prompts...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | R Stuart Geiger, Flynn O'Sullivan, Elsie Wang, Jonathan Lo |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318500 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
ChatGPT-4 Omni’s superiority in answering multiple-choice oral radiology questions
by: Melek Tassoker
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Language learners’ surface, deep, and organizing approaches to ChatGPT-assisted language learning: What contextual, individual, and ChatGPT-related factors contribute?
by: Amir Reza Rahimi, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
ChatGPT in orthodontics: limitations and possibilities
by: Lima Nara Grazieli Martins, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01) -
The Comparative Sufficiency of ChatGPT, Google Bard, and Bing AI in Answering Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis Questions About Common Dermatological Diagnoses
by: Courtney A Chau, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPT
by: Jérôme Rutinowski, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)