Evaluating Propensity Score Methods in a Quasi-Experimental Study of the Impact of Menu-Labeling.
<h4>Background</h4>Quasi-experimental studies of menu labeling have found mixed results for improving diet. Differences between experimental groups can hinder interpretation. Propensity scores are an increasingly common method to improve covariate balance, but multiple methods exist and...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Stephanie L Mayne, Brian K Lee, Amy H Auchincloss |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2015-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0144962&type=printable |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Menu Labelling on Online Meal Delivery Platforms: Discrete Experimental Choice Study
by: Liyuwork Mitiku Dana, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
Calorie labelling regulations in England: menu change not behaviour change?
by: Alexandra Kalbus, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Weight trimming and propensity score weighting.
by: Brian K Lee, et al.
Published: (2011-03-01) -
Going beyond «The Standard Menu»?
by: B. F. Martynov
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Estimated effect of media use on mothers’ vaccination of their children in Sub-Saharan Africa: a quasi-experimental propensity score matching analysis using DHS data
by: Melak Jejaw, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)