Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis

Abstract Background Existing evidence demonstrates the benefits of integrated palliative care for people with cancer, for improved symptom burden, quality of life for patient and caregiver, and appropriate healthcare resource use. The integration of palliative care and oncology has the potential to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natasha Bradley, Tracey McConnell, Carolyn Blair, Peter O’Halloran, Gillian Prue, Fiona Lynn, Nia Roberts, Geoff Wong, Elspeth Banks, Joanne Reid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04083-1
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849312029174661120
author Natasha Bradley
Tracey McConnell
Carolyn Blair
Peter O’Halloran
Gillian Prue
Fiona Lynn
Nia Roberts
Geoff Wong
Elspeth Banks
Joanne Reid
author_facet Natasha Bradley
Tracey McConnell
Carolyn Blair
Peter O’Halloran
Gillian Prue
Fiona Lynn
Nia Roberts
Geoff Wong
Elspeth Banks
Joanne Reid
author_sort Natasha Bradley
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Existing evidence demonstrates the benefits of integrated palliative care for people with cancer, for improved symptom burden, quality of life for patient and caregiver, and appropriate healthcare resource use. The integration of palliative care and oncology has the potential to reduce suffering and is recommended by international guidelines. However, it is not yet consistent practice. There are many approaches to integration, but it is unclear what works, for whom, and in what contexts, to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients, families, and healthcare systems. Methods Realist review, conducted in accordance with RAMESES quality standards. Evidence was identified through systematic academic databases searches and stakeholder engagement. Data were extracted from included articles and synthesized using realist analysis to develop explanations of how and why integrated palliative care in oncology works, for whom, and in what contexts. Results One hundred sixty-four papers were included in the review, from 33 countries, and involving a range of inpatient, outpatient, and home-based care settings. Integrated palliative care and oncology could improve patient outcomes, increase the goal-concordance of patient care, and support workforce wellbeing. Interventions towards integration should be tailored to the context in which they are delivered. Ensuring the timely delivery of palliative care for people with cancer requires integration that overcomes siloes between oncology, specialist palliative care, and primary and community care. The motivation to prioritise the integration of palliative care relies upon all stakeholders first understanding its value. Enriched interdisciplinary collaboration involves developing staff skills and confidence, facilitating coordination between care settings, and supporting communication within and between teams. Leadership is needed at all levels to attend to the structural and social norms of care. Conclusions The success of integration is influenced by the ways in which palliative care is understood, prioritised, operationalised, and measured within oncology. Through the synthesis of international evidence, this project draws on implementation science to contribute clarity on how integrated palliative care and cancer care can be achieved in practice.
format Article
id doaj-art-b2d2b92d62ee4886a412433505c692d3
institution Kabale University
issn 1741-7015
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medicine
spelling doaj-art-b2d2b92d62ee4886a412433505c692d32025-08-20T03:53:12ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152025-05-0123111310.1186/s12916-025-04083-1Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesisNatasha Bradley0Tracey McConnell1Carolyn Blair2Peter O’Halloran3Gillian Prue4Fiona Lynn5Nia Roberts6Geoff Wong7Elspeth Banks8Joanne Reid9School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastBodleian Health Care Libraries, University of OxfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of OxfordLiving With and Beyond Cancer, National Cancer Research InstituteSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen’s University BelfastAbstract Background Existing evidence demonstrates the benefits of integrated palliative care for people with cancer, for improved symptom burden, quality of life for patient and caregiver, and appropriate healthcare resource use. The integration of palliative care and oncology has the potential to reduce suffering and is recommended by international guidelines. However, it is not yet consistent practice. There are many approaches to integration, but it is unclear what works, for whom, and in what contexts, to achieve the best possible outcomes for patients, families, and healthcare systems. Methods Realist review, conducted in accordance with RAMESES quality standards. Evidence was identified through systematic academic databases searches and stakeholder engagement. Data were extracted from included articles and synthesized using realist analysis to develop explanations of how and why integrated palliative care in oncology works, for whom, and in what contexts. Results One hundred sixty-four papers were included in the review, from 33 countries, and involving a range of inpatient, outpatient, and home-based care settings. Integrated palliative care and oncology could improve patient outcomes, increase the goal-concordance of patient care, and support workforce wellbeing. Interventions towards integration should be tailored to the context in which they are delivered. Ensuring the timely delivery of palliative care for people with cancer requires integration that overcomes siloes between oncology, specialist palliative care, and primary and community care. The motivation to prioritise the integration of palliative care relies upon all stakeholders first understanding its value. Enriched interdisciplinary collaboration involves developing staff skills and confidence, facilitating coordination between care settings, and supporting communication within and between teams. Leadership is needed at all levels to attend to the structural and social norms of care. Conclusions The success of integration is influenced by the ways in which palliative care is understood, prioritised, operationalised, and measured within oncology. Through the synthesis of international evidence, this project draws on implementation science to contribute clarity on how integrated palliative care and cancer care can be achieved in practice.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04083-1Palliative careOncologyIntegrationRealist synthesis
spellingShingle Natasha Bradley
Tracey McConnell
Carolyn Blair
Peter O’Halloran
Gillian Prue
Fiona Lynn
Nia Roberts
Geoff Wong
Elspeth Banks
Joanne Reid
Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis
BMC Medicine
Palliative care
Oncology
Integration
Realist synthesis
title Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis
title_full Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis
title_fullStr Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis
title_short Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis
title_sort integrated palliative care and oncology a realist synthesis
topic Palliative care
Oncology
Integration
Realist synthesis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04083-1
work_keys_str_mv AT natashabradley integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT traceymcconnell integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT carolynblair integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT peterohalloran integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT gillianprue integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT fionalynn integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT niaroberts integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT geoffwong integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT elspethbanks integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis
AT joannereid integratedpalliativecareandoncologyarealistsynthesis