Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin

Trifludimoxazin is a new herbicide that inhibits protoporphyrinogen oxidase and is being evaluated for the control of small-seeded annual broadleaf weeds and grasses in several crops. Currently, no information is available regarding peanut cultivar response to trifludimoxazin and its utility in pean...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chad C. Abbott, Nicholas J. Shay, Eric P. Prostko
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2025-01-01
Series:Weed Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0890037X25000053/type/journal_article
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849729125170806784
author Chad C. Abbott
Nicholas J. Shay
Eric P. Prostko
author_facet Chad C. Abbott
Nicholas J. Shay
Eric P. Prostko
author_sort Chad C. Abbott
collection DOAJ
description Trifludimoxazin is a new herbicide that inhibits protoporphyrinogen oxidase and is being evaluated for the control of small-seeded annual broadleaf weeds and grasses in several crops. Currently, no information is available regarding peanut cultivar response to trifludimoxazin and its utility in peanut weed control systems. Three unique field experiments were conducted and replicated in time from 2019 through 2022 to determine the response of seven peanut cultivars (‘AU-NPL 17’, ‘FloRun 331’, ‘GA-06G’, ‘GA-16HO’, ‘GA-18RU’, ‘GA-20VHO’, and ‘TifNV High O/L’) to preemergence applications of trifludimoxazin and to determine the efficacy of trifludimoxazin at multiple rates and tank-mixtures with acetochlor, diclosulam, dimethenamid-P, pendimethalin, and S-metolachlor for weed management. Cultivar sensitivities to trifludimoxazin were not observed. Peanut density was not reduced by any trifludimoxazin rate. Compared with nontreated controls, in 2019 when trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha−1, leaf necrosis increased by 18% and peanut stunting increased by 10%, and yield was reduced by 6%. However, this rate increased leaf necrosis by only 4%, stunting by 3% to 5%, and it had no negative effect on yield in 2020–2021. Generally, peanut injury from preemergence-applied trifludimoxazin was similar to or less than that observed from flumioxazin at 2 wk after application (WAA). Peanut yield in the weed control study was reduced by 11% to 12% when treated with trifludimoxazin at 150 g ha−1 (4× the standard rate) when compared to the 75 g ha−1 rate. However, yield was not different from the flumioxazin treatment. Palmer amaranth control with trifludimoxazin combinations was ≥91% at 13 WAA, wild radish control was ≥96% at 5 WAA, and annual grass control was ≥97% at 13 WAA. Peanut is sufficiently tolerant of 38 g ha−1 of trifludimoxazin, and when tank-mixed with other residual herbicides provides weed control similar to flumioxazin-based systems.
format Article
id doaj-art-b2d12efe73fe4740bbd0e83bfd94297e
institution DOAJ
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Weed Technology
spelling doaj-art-b2d12efe73fe4740bbd0e83bfd94297e2025-08-20T03:09:19ZengCambridge University PressWeed Technology0890-037X1550-27402025-01-013910.1017/wet.2025.5Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazinChad C. Abbott0Nicholas J. Shay1Eric P. Prostko2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-5545Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, 104 Research Way, Tifton, GA, 31793Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, 104 Research Way, Tifton, GA, 31793Professor/Extension Weed Specialist, Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, The University of Georgia, 104 Research Way, Tifton, GA, 31793Trifludimoxazin is a new herbicide that inhibits protoporphyrinogen oxidase and is being evaluated for the control of small-seeded annual broadleaf weeds and grasses in several crops. Currently, no information is available regarding peanut cultivar response to trifludimoxazin and its utility in peanut weed control systems. Three unique field experiments were conducted and replicated in time from 2019 through 2022 to determine the response of seven peanut cultivars (‘AU-NPL 17’, ‘FloRun 331’, ‘GA-06G’, ‘GA-16HO’, ‘GA-18RU’, ‘GA-20VHO’, and ‘TifNV High O/L’) to preemergence applications of trifludimoxazin and to determine the efficacy of trifludimoxazin at multiple rates and tank-mixtures with acetochlor, diclosulam, dimethenamid-P, pendimethalin, and S-metolachlor for weed management. Cultivar sensitivities to trifludimoxazin were not observed. Peanut density was not reduced by any trifludimoxazin rate. Compared with nontreated controls, in 2019 when trifludimoxazin was applied at 75 g ai ha−1, leaf necrosis increased by 18% and peanut stunting increased by 10%, and yield was reduced by 6%. However, this rate increased leaf necrosis by only 4%, stunting by 3% to 5%, and it had no negative effect on yield in 2020–2021. Generally, peanut injury from preemergence-applied trifludimoxazin was similar to or less than that observed from flumioxazin at 2 wk after application (WAA). Peanut yield in the weed control study was reduced by 11% to 12% when treated with trifludimoxazin at 150 g ha−1 (4× the standard rate) when compared to the 75 g ha−1 rate. However, yield was not different from the flumioxazin treatment. Palmer amaranth control with trifludimoxazin combinations was ≥91% at 13 WAA, wild radish control was ≥96% at 5 WAA, and annual grass control was ≥97% at 13 WAA. Peanut is sufficiently tolerant of 38 g ha−1 of trifludimoxazin, and when tank-mixed with other residual herbicides provides weed control similar to flumioxazin-based systems.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0890037X25000053/type/journal_articleAcetochlordiclosulamdimethenamid-PflumioxazinpendimethalinS-metolachlortrifludimoxazinPalmer amaranthAmaranthus palmeri S. Watson AMAPAwild radishRaphanus raphanistrum L. RAPRApeanutArachis hypogaea L.BAS-850-01Hcrop injuryimazapicvarietyweed controlyield
spellingShingle Chad C. Abbott
Nicholas J. Shay
Eric P. Prostko
Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin
Weed Technology
Acetochlor
diclosulam
dimethenamid-P
flumioxazin
pendimethalin
S-metolachlor
trifludimoxazin
Palmer amaranth
Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson AMAPA
wild radish
Raphanus raphanistrum L. RAPRA
peanut
Arachis hypogaea L.
BAS-850-01H
crop injury
imazapic
variety
weed control
yield
title Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin
title_full Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin
title_fullStr Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin
title_full_unstemmed Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin
title_short Cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin
title_sort cultivar response and weed control in peanut with trifludimoxazin
topic Acetochlor
diclosulam
dimethenamid-P
flumioxazin
pendimethalin
S-metolachlor
trifludimoxazin
Palmer amaranth
Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson AMAPA
wild radish
Raphanus raphanistrum L. RAPRA
peanut
Arachis hypogaea L.
BAS-850-01H
crop injury
imazapic
variety
weed control
yield
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0890037X25000053/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT chadcabbott cultivarresponseandweedcontrolinpeanutwithtrifludimoxazin
AT nicholasjshay cultivarresponseandweedcontrolinpeanutwithtrifludimoxazin
AT ericpprostko cultivarresponseandweedcontrolinpeanutwithtrifludimoxazin