Rewizje historii i dyskursu kryminologicznego: Kuśniewicz, Terlecki, Rymkiewicz

<span>The article concerns texts which problematize such figures of criminological discourse as crime, perpetrator, victim, interrogator, or the penitentiary system. The works of A. Kuśniewicz, W.L. Terlecki and J.M. Rymkiewicz perform multidimensional revisions: they question traditional thin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dorota Wojda
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University 2011-01-01
Series:Przestrzenie Teorii
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/3328
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:<span>The article concerns texts which problematize such figures of criminological discourse as crime, perpetrator, victim, interrogator, or the penitentiary system. The works of A. Kuśniewicz, W.L. Terlecki and J.M. Rymkiewicz perform multidimensional revisions: they question traditional thinking about historical truth and the means of reaching it; they trespass the border between literature and fiction; they resist criminological discourse. The writers discussed formulate a diagnosis in many aspects close to that of M. Foucault’s and the new victimology, proving that representations of history as well as mechanisms of social control are discourses of restrictive authority. Korupcja [Corruption], Odpocznij po biegu [Rest after The Race], and Wielki książę [The Grand Duke] respond to such violence with revisions of history as well as the present, thanks to which literature becomes a form of radical hermeneuti</span>
ISSN:1644-6763
2450-5765