Safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experience

Abstract Background The proliferation of International Investment Agreements (IIAs), as the result of globalization, has been identified as one of the factors contributing to policy inertia or chill on meaningful public health policy action. Health safeguards, i.e., specific clauses to protect the S...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gastón Ares, Gerónimo Brunet, Dori Patay, Anne-Marie Thow
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-05-01
Series:Globalization and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01110-x
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849728995149479936
author Gastón Ares
Gerónimo Brunet
Dori Patay
Anne-Marie Thow
author_facet Gastón Ares
Gerónimo Brunet
Dori Patay
Anne-Marie Thow
author_sort Gastón Ares
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The proliferation of International Investment Agreements (IIAs), as the result of globalization, has been identified as one of the factors contributing to policy inertia or chill on meaningful public health policy action. Health safeguards, i.e., specific clauses to protect the State’s right to regulate, have been increasingly included in IIAs to protect health policy. However, an in-depth understanding of the processes involved in the diffusion of health safeguards in IIAs globally and the factors acting as barriers and facilitators for their uptake is still lacking. In this context, the present study intends to fill this research gap by analysing the uptake of health safeguards in the context of Uruguay, a developing Latin American country. The objectives were to: (i) examine the evolution of the inclusion of health safeguards in the Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) signed by Uruguay until 2024, (ii) analyse how Uruguay has approached BITs after the Philip Morris ISDS case, (iii) explore Uruguayan stakeholders’ perspectives on the inclusion of health safeguards in BITs, (iv) identify barriers and facilitators for the uptake of health safeguards in the BITs. Results Documentary analysis of the BITs signed by Uruguay showed an ascending trend in the inclusion of health safeguards, reaching 100% since 2010. Interviews with key stakeholders suggested that health safeguards diffused from abroad through transnational transfer networks. While Uruguay has not faced challenges in including health safeguards in recent BITs, the renegotiation of old generation BIT agreements with developed countries has proven to be difficult. A wide range of factors that act as facilitators and barriers for the inclusion for health safeguards in the BITs were identified, which were related to both the national and intergovernmental levels. Conclusions Results contribute to the understanding of the factors that influence the evolution of the interface between investment agreements and public health policy by analysing the adoption of health safeguards in BITs. Strong recommendations from international organizations to renegotiate old generation BITs may contribute to overcoming the existing power dynamics and support developing countries in the protection of their regulatory space.
format Article
id doaj-art-b258ffca2c844d01ae3555587c34e342
institution DOAJ
issn 1744-8603
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Globalization and Health
spelling doaj-art-b258ffca2c844d01ae3555587c34e3422025-08-20T03:09:21ZengBMCGlobalization and Health1744-86032025-05-0121111610.1186/s12992-025-01110-xSafeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experienceGastón Ares0Gerónimo Brunet1Dori Patay2Anne-Marie Thow3Instituto Polo Tecnológico de Pando, Facultad de Química, Universidad de la RepúblicaEspacio Interdisciplinario, Universidad de la RepúblicaFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics, and Data, The University of SydneyFaculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney School of Public Health, Leeder Centre for Health Policy, Economics, and Data, The University of SydneyAbstract Background The proliferation of International Investment Agreements (IIAs), as the result of globalization, has been identified as one of the factors contributing to policy inertia or chill on meaningful public health policy action. Health safeguards, i.e., specific clauses to protect the State’s right to regulate, have been increasingly included in IIAs to protect health policy. However, an in-depth understanding of the processes involved in the diffusion of health safeguards in IIAs globally and the factors acting as barriers and facilitators for their uptake is still lacking. In this context, the present study intends to fill this research gap by analysing the uptake of health safeguards in the context of Uruguay, a developing Latin American country. The objectives were to: (i) examine the evolution of the inclusion of health safeguards in the Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) signed by Uruguay until 2024, (ii) analyse how Uruguay has approached BITs after the Philip Morris ISDS case, (iii) explore Uruguayan stakeholders’ perspectives on the inclusion of health safeguards in BITs, (iv) identify barriers and facilitators for the uptake of health safeguards in the BITs. Results Documentary analysis of the BITs signed by Uruguay showed an ascending trend in the inclusion of health safeguards, reaching 100% since 2010. Interviews with key stakeholders suggested that health safeguards diffused from abroad through transnational transfer networks. While Uruguay has not faced challenges in including health safeguards in recent BITs, the renegotiation of old generation BIT agreements with developed countries has proven to be difficult. A wide range of factors that act as facilitators and barriers for the inclusion for health safeguards in the BITs were identified, which were related to both the national and intergovernmental levels. Conclusions Results contribute to the understanding of the factors that influence the evolution of the interface between investment agreements and public health policy by analysing the adoption of health safeguards in BITs. Strong recommendations from international organizations to renegotiate old generation BITs may contribute to overcoming the existing power dynamics and support developing countries in the protection of their regulatory space.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01110-xInternational investment agreementsRight to regulatePublic healthPublic health exception clausesForeign investmentHealth safeguards
spellingShingle Gastón Ares
Gerónimo Brunet
Dori Patay
Anne-Marie Thow
Safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experience
Globalization and Health
International investment agreements
Right to regulate
Public health
Public health exception clauses
Foreign investment
Health safeguards
title Safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experience
title_full Safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experience
title_fullStr Safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experience
title_full_unstemmed Safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experience
title_short Safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties: the Uruguayan experience
title_sort safeguarding health in bilateral investment treaties the uruguayan experience
topic International investment agreements
Right to regulate
Public health
Public health exception clauses
Foreign investment
Health safeguards
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-025-01110-x
work_keys_str_mv AT gastonares safeguardinghealthinbilateralinvestmenttreatiestheuruguayanexperience
AT geronimobrunet safeguardinghealthinbilateralinvestmenttreatiestheuruguayanexperience
AT doripatay safeguardinghealthinbilateralinvestmenttreatiestheuruguayanexperience
AT annemariethow safeguardinghealthinbilateralinvestmenttreatiestheuruguayanexperience