Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?
In its own time, Ben Jonson’s 1616 Folio was considered revolutionary. Jonson’s contemporaries were astonished by his hubris in printing a collected Workes, which included a number of plays and masques, in a folio volume during his own lifetime. At the same time, his folio served as a model for the...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institut du Monde Anglophone
2008-10-01
|
| Series: | Etudes Epistémè |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/736 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849328884700413952 |
|---|---|
| author | Lynn S. Meskill |
| author_facet | Lynn S. Meskill |
| author_sort | Lynn S. Meskill |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In its own time, Ben Jonson’s 1616 Folio was considered revolutionary. Jonson’s contemporaries were astonished by his hubris in printing a collected Workes, which included a number of plays and masques, in a folio volume during his own lifetime. At the same time, his folio served as a model for the First Folio of Shakespeare and Beaumont and Fletcher’s 1647 Folio. Plays and masques were regularly printed in quarto and octavo volumes in the early modern period, so the novelty of the 1616 Folio does not lie in the printing of plays and masques. Rather, the publication of these highly collaborative genres in a volume dedicated to the fame of the single « Author » may well have been at the heart of the revolutionary aspect of Jonson’s project. In Sejanus, His Fall (1605), Hymenaei (1606) and The Haddington Masque (1608), we see how Jonson confronts the moral quandary of appropriating his collaborators’ work for himself and the strategies he uses to justify himself for posterity. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b1fea62ed07745dba500d006e5af2cef |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1634-0450 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2008-10-01 |
| publisher | Institut du Monde Anglophone |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Etudes Epistémè |
| spelling | doaj-art-b1fea62ed07745dba500d006e5af2cef2025-08-20T03:47:25ZengInstitut du Monde AnglophoneEtudes Epistémè1634-04502008-10-011410.4000/episteme.736Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print?Lynn S. MeskillIn its own time, Ben Jonson’s 1616 Folio was considered revolutionary. Jonson’s contemporaries were astonished by his hubris in printing a collected Workes, which included a number of plays and masques, in a folio volume during his own lifetime. At the same time, his folio served as a model for the First Folio of Shakespeare and Beaumont and Fletcher’s 1647 Folio. Plays and masques were regularly printed in quarto and octavo volumes in the early modern period, so the novelty of the 1616 Folio does not lie in the printing of plays and masques. Rather, the publication of these highly collaborative genres in a volume dedicated to the fame of the single « Author » may well have been at the heart of the revolutionary aspect of Jonson’s project. In Sejanus, His Fall (1605), Hymenaei (1606) and The Haddington Masque (1608), we see how Jonson confronts the moral quandary of appropriating his collaborators’ work for himself and the strategies he uses to justify himself for posterity.https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/736 |
| spellingShingle | Lynn S. Meskill Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print? Etudes Epistémè |
| title | Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print? |
| title_full | Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print? |
| title_fullStr | Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print? |
| title_full_unstemmed | Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print? |
| title_short | Ben Jonson's 1616 Folio: A Revolution in Print? |
| title_sort | ben jonson s 1616 folio a revolution in print |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/episteme/736 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lynnsmeskill benjonsons1616folioarevolutioninprint |