THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES

The issue is about the basis of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate corruption crimes that have not been enforced by permanent law (inkrach) from the district court. This study aims to find out what is the basis for the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commiss...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mubarooq Ilahi, Frans Simangunsong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM 2024-01-01
Series:IBLAM Law Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/article/view/299
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850110690818260992
author Mubarooq Ilahi
Frans Simangunsong
author_facet Mubarooq Ilahi
Frans Simangunsong
author_sort Mubarooq Ilahi
collection DOAJ
description The issue is about the basis of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate corruption crimes that have not been enforced by permanent law (inkrach) from the district court. This study aims to find out what is the basis for the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate in corruption crimes and how the legal position of seized goods in corruption crimes. By using normative research methods, it can be concluded that: 1. The basis of authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission is Law Number 30 of 2002 Article 47 paragraph 1 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the eradication of corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption crimes. 2. The legal position of confiscated goods will certainly be used as evidence by the Corruption Eradication Commission as law enforcement. However, there are often obstacles in the management of confiscated goods. Then confiscated goods can also be auctioned even though there has been no permanent force legal decision (inkrach) from the district court.
format Article
id doaj-art-b1e5d77951dc471e90ecfe244eeaf04c
institution OA Journals
issn 2775-4146
2775-3174
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM
record_format Article
series IBLAM Law Review
spelling doaj-art-b1e5d77951dc471e90ecfe244eeaf04c2025-08-20T02:37:47ZengSekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAMIBLAM Law Review2775-41462775-31742024-01-014110.52249/ilr.v4i1.299THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMESMubarooq Ilahi0Frans Simangunsong1Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 SurabayaUniversitas 17 Agustus 1945 SurabayaThe issue is about the basis of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate corruption crimes that have not been enforced by permanent law (inkrach) from the district court. This study aims to find out what is the basis for the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate in corruption crimes and how the legal position of seized goods in corruption crimes. By using normative research methods, it can be concluded that: 1. The basis of authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission is Law Number 30 of 2002 Article 47 paragraph 1 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the eradication of corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption crimes. 2. The legal position of confiscated goods will certainly be used as evidence by the Corruption Eradication Commission as law enforcement. However, there are often obstacles in the management of confiscated goods. Then confiscated goods can also be auctioned even though there has been no permanent force legal decision (inkrach) from the district court. https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/article/view/299Authority of the Corruption Eradication CommissionConfiscationCorruption Crimes
spellingShingle Mubarooq Ilahi
Frans Simangunsong
THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES
IBLAM Law Review
Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission
Confiscation
Corruption Crimes
title THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES
title_full THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES
title_fullStr THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES
title_full_unstemmed THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES
title_short THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES
title_sort basis of the corruption eradication commission s authority to carry out confiscation in corruption crimes
topic Authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission
Confiscation
Corruption Crimes
url https://ejurnal.iblam.ac.id/IRL/index.php/ILR/article/view/299
work_keys_str_mv AT mubarooqilahi thebasisofthecorruptioneradicationcommissionsauthoritytocarryoutconfiscationincorruptioncrimes
AT franssimangunsong thebasisofthecorruptioneradicationcommissionsauthoritytocarryoutconfiscationincorruptioncrimes
AT mubarooqilahi basisofthecorruptioneradicationcommissionsauthoritytocarryoutconfiscationincorruptioncrimes
AT franssimangunsong basisofthecorruptioneradicationcommissionsauthoritytocarryoutconfiscationincorruptioncrimes