Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices
Individuals’ decisions to promote or limit diversity in the workplace are ambivalent and may be influenced by their cognitive focus. Drawing from construal level theory, we test across five studies whether individuals are more supportive of diversity when diversity is thought of more abstractly vers...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2025-04-01
|
| Series: | Behavioral Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/5/585 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849327413378416640 |
|---|---|
| author | Claudia Toma Ashli B. Carter Katherine W. Phillips |
| author_facet | Claudia Toma Ashli B. Carter Katherine W. Phillips |
| author_sort | Claudia Toma |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Individuals’ decisions to promote or limit diversity in the workplace are ambivalent and may be influenced by their cognitive focus. Drawing from construal level theory, we test across five studies whether individuals are more supportive of diversity when diversity is thought of more abstractly versus concretely. Furthermore, we examined the salience of diversity pros and cons as the underlying mechanisms, as well as the role of egalitarian beliefs as a boundary condition for this discrepancy. We tested these hypotheses in five studies, which varied in samples, cognitive focus manipulation, and measures. Dutch and American individuals indicated more positive attitudes toward diversity (Studies 1 and 2) and made more choices that enhanced diversity (Studies 2 and 5) when they considered diversity abstractly (for most companies and teams) rather than concretely (for their own company and teams). Furthermore, the discrepancy in diversity attitudes by construal level was more pronounced among individuals with egalitarian beliefs (Study 3) and was driven by the heightened salience of diversity pros at more abstract versus concrete levels of construal (Study 4). This research contributes to further understanding the ambivalent view of diversity and provides concrete recommendations for diversity management in organizations. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b16633c76bf242a7aef26a2d04df07f4 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2076-328X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-04-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Behavioral Sciences |
| spelling | doaj-art-b16633c76bf242a7aef26a2d04df07f42025-08-20T03:47:53ZengMDPI AGBehavioral Sciences2076-328X2025-04-0115558510.3390/bs15050585Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and ChoicesClaudia Toma0Ashli B. Carter1Katherine W. Phillips2Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Bruxelles, BelgiumColumbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USAColumbia Business School, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USAIndividuals’ decisions to promote or limit diversity in the workplace are ambivalent and may be influenced by their cognitive focus. Drawing from construal level theory, we test across five studies whether individuals are more supportive of diversity when diversity is thought of more abstractly versus concretely. Furthermore, we examined the salience of diversity pros and cons as the underlying mechanisms, as well as the role of egalitarian beliefs as a boundary condition for this discrepancy. We tested these hypotheses in five studies, which varied in samples, cognitive focus manipulation, and measures. Dutch and American individuals indicated more positive attitudes toward diversity (Studies 1 and 2) and made more choices that enhanced diversity (Studies 2 and 5) when they considered diversity abstractly (for most companies and teams) rather than concretely (for their own company and teams). Furthermore, the discrepancy in diversity attitudes by construal level was more pronounced among individuals with egalitarian beliefs (Study 3) and was driven by the heightened salience of diversity pros at more abstract versus concrete levels of construal (Study 4). This research contributes to further understanding the ambivalent view of diversity and provides concrete recommendations for diversity management in organizations.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/5/585workplace diversitydiversity attitudesconstrual levelsocial dominance orientation |
| spellingShingle | Claudia Toma Ashli B. Carter Katherine W. Phillips Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices Behavioral Sciences workplace diversity diversity attitudes construal level social dominance orientation |
| title | Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices |
| title_full | Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices |
| title_fullStr | Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices |
| title_full_unstemmed | Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices |
| title_short | Diversity? Great for Most Just Less So for Me: How Cognitive Abstraction Affects Diversity Attitudes and Choices |
| title_sort | diversity great for most just less so for me how cognitive abstraction affects diversity attitudes and choices |
| topic | workplace diversity diversity attitudes construal level social dominance orientation |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-328X/15/5/585 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT claudiatoma diversitygreatformostjustlesssoformehowcognitiveabstractionaffectsdiversityattitudesandchoices AT ashlibcarter diversitygreatformostjustlesssoformehowcognitiveabstractionaffectsdiversityattitudesandchoices AT katherinewphillips diversitygreatformostjustlesssoformehowcognitiveabstractionaffectsdiversityattitudesandchoices |