Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.

<h4>Objective</h4>To examine pre-pregnancy characteristics, pregnancy complications, and birth outcomes among respondents with self-reported disability compared to those without disability.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional weighted sample of 2,006,700 respondents with singlet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeanne L Alhusen, Genevieve R Lyons, Rosemary B Hughes, Kathryn Laughon, Maria McDonald, Casey L Johnson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319950
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850095347140919296
author Jeanne L Alhusen
Genevieve R Lyons
Rosemary B Hughes
Kathryn Laughon
Maria McDonald
Casey L Johnson
author_facet Jeanne L Alhusen
Genevieve R Lyons
Rosemary B Hughes
Kathryn Laughon
Maria McDonald
Casey L Johnson
author_sort Jeanne L Alhusen
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objective</h4>To examine pre-pregnancy characteristics, pregnancy complications, and birth outcomes among respondents with self-reported disability compared to those without disability.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional weighted sample of 2,006,700 respondents with singleton live births who participated in the United States Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) between 2018 and 2021 provided data on disability, including difficulty in vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, communication, and self-care. We estimated covariate-adjusted odds of differences in pre-pregnancy chronic health conditions, pregnancy intention, intimate partner violence (IPV), depression, adequacy of prenatal care, pregnancy-related health conditions, and birth outcomes by disability status.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 2,006,700 respondents included, 59.5% reported no disability, 33.9% had moderate disability, and 6.6% had severe disability. Across most outcomes, there was a graded pattern with those with severe disability having the worst outcomes compared to the other two groups. Respondents with severe disability were more likely to report diabetes and hypertension before becoming pregnant than respondents without disabilities. Those respondents with severe disability or moderate disability had an increased odds of reporting IPV and depression than those with no disability. During pregnancy, respondents with severe disability had an increased odds of gestational diabetes (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.18, 1.80) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.43, 2.02) as compared to respondents with no disability. Respondents with moderate disability also had an increased odds of both gestational diabetes (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06, 1.34) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17, 1.42) as compared to those with no disability. The odds of reporting an unintended pregnancy were highest in respondents with a severe disability (aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.43, 1.94) and were also increased in respondents with moderate disability (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36, 1.62) as compared to those reporting no disability. Across most birth outcomes, respondents with severe disabilities had worse outcomes with an increased odds of low birth weight infants (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08, 1.52), preterm birth (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11, 1.57), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.06) as compared to respondents with no disability. There were not differences in being classified as small for gestational age or infants' length of hospital stay by disability status.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Across the perinatal period, respondents with moderate or severe disability experienced worse outcomes than those without disability. There is a critical need to improve pre-conception health in an effort to reduce inequities in pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, health care providers and systems must provide equitable access to care to persons with disabilities to reduce inequities in outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-b141ef677beb42c698c1d7c68df0b2dc
institution DOAJ
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-b141ef677beb42c698c1d7c68df0b2dc2025-08-20T02:41:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01203e031995010.1371/journal.pone.0319950Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.Jeanne L AlhusenGenevieve R LyonsRosemary B HughesKathryn LaughonMaria McDonaldCasey L Johnson<h4>Objective</h4>To examine pre-pregnancy characteristics, pregnancy complications, and birth outcomes among respondents with self-reported disability compared to those without disability.<h4>Methods</h4>A cross-sectional weighted sample of 2,006,700 respondents with singleton live births who participated in the United States Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) between 2018 and 2021 provided data on disability, including difficulty in vision, hearing, ambulation, cognition, communication, and self-care. We estimated covariate-adjusted odds of differences in pre-pregnancy chronic health conditions, pregnancy intention, intimate partner violence (IPV), depression, adequacy of prenatal care, pregnancy-related health conditions, and birth outcomes by disability status.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 2,006,700 respondents included, 59.5% reported no disability, 33.9% had moderate disability, and 6.6% had severe disability. Across most outcomes, there was a graded pattern with those with severe disability having the worst outcomes compared to the other two groups. Respondents with severe disability were more likely to report diabetes and hypertension before becoming pregnant than respondents without disabilities. Those respondents with severe disability or moderate disability had an increased odds of reporting IPV and depression than those with no disability. During pregnancy, respondents with severe disability had an increased odds of gestational diabetes (aOR 1.46, 95% CI 1.18, 1.80) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.43, 2.02) as compared to respondents with no disability. Respondents with moderate disability also had an increased odds of both gestational diabetes (aOR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06, 1.34) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (aOR 1.29, 95% CI 1.17, 1.42) as compared to those with no disability. The odds of reporting an unintended pregnancy were highest in respondents with a severe disability (aOR 1.66, 95% CI 1.43, 1.94) and were also increased in respondents with moderate disability (aOR 1.48, 95% CI 1.36, 1.62) as compared to those reporting no disability. Across most birth outcomes, respondents with severe disabilities had worse outcomes with an increased odds of low birth weight infants (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08, 1.52), preterm birth (aOR 1.32, 95% CI 1.11, 1.57), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR 1.45, 95% CI 1.02, 2.06) as compared to respondents with no disability. There were not differences in being classified as small for gestational age or infants' length of hospital stay by disability status.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Across the perinatal period, respondents with moderate or severe disability experienced worse outcomes than those without disability. There is a critical need to improve pre-conception health in an effort to reduce inequities in pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, health care providers and systems must provide equitable access to care to persons with disabilities to reduce inequities in outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319950
spellingShingle Jeanne L Alhusen
Genevieve R Lyons
Rosemary B Hughes
Kathryn Laughon
Maria McDonald
Casey L Johnson
Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.
PLoS ONE
title Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.
title_full Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.
title_fullStr Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.
title_full_unstemmed Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.
title_short Examining perinatal health inequities: The role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the U.S. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System.
title_sort examining perinatal health inequities the role of disability and risk of adverse outcomes through the u s pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319950
work_keys_str_mv AT jeannelalhusen examiningperinatalhealthinequitiestheroleofdisabilityandriskofadverseoutcomesthroughtheuspregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystem
AT genevieverlyons examiningperinatalhealthinequitiestheroleofdisabilityandriskofadverseoutcomesthroughtheuspregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystem
AT rosemarybhughes examiningperinatalhealthinequitiestheroleofdisabilityandriskofadverseoutcomesthroughtheuspregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystem
AT kathrynlaughon examiningperinatalhealthinequitiestheroleofdisabilityandriskofadverseoutcomesthroughtheuspregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystem
AT mariamcdonald examiningperinatalhealthinequitiestheroleofdisabilityandriskofadverseoutcomesthroughtheuspregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystem
AT caseyljohnson examiningperinatalhealthinequitiestheroleofdisabilityandriskofadverseoutcomesthroughtheuspregnancyriskassessmentmonitoringsystem