Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness

Abstract One experiment commonly used to teach young students about the response of structures to dynamic loading is the “egg drop challenge”, in which students design a device to protect an egg from cracking after a fall from a specified height. Relevant to this activity is the choice of orientatio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antony Sutanto, Suhib Abu-Qbeitah, Avishai Jeselsohn, Brendan M. Unikewicz, Joseph E. Bonavia, Stephen Rudolph, Hudson Borja da Rocha, S. Kiana Naghibzadeh, Tal Cohen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-05-01
Series:Communications Physics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02087-0
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1850277782909616128
author Antony Sutanto
Suhib Abu-Qbeitah
Avishai Jeselsohn
Brendan M. Unikewicz
Joseph E. Bonavia
Stephen Rudolph
Hudson Borja da Rocha
S. Kiana Naghibzadeh
Tal Cohen
author_facet Antony Sutanto
Suhib Abu-Qbeitah
Avishai Jeselsohn
Brendan M. Unikewicz
Joseph E. Bonavia
Stephen Rudolph
Hudson Borja da Rocha
S. Kiana Naghibzadeh
Tal Cohen
author_sort Antony Sutanto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract One experiment commonly used to teach young students about the response of structures to dynamic loading is the “egg drop challenge”, in which students design a device to protect an egg from cracking after a fall from a specified height. Relevant to this activity is the choice of orientation of the egg to decrease the probability of fracture. In this study, we contest the commonly held belief that an egg is strongest when dropped vertically on its end. Through hundreds of experiments and a set of static and dynamic simulations, we demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood that an egg breaks when oriented horizontally as opposed to vertically, and offer a concrete and intuitive explanation as to why this is the case. These results and the associated analysis demonstrate the importance of specificity of language and the dangers of appealing to “common sense” in the physics classroom while having wide-ranging implications due to the ubiquity of shell structures in nature and in the man-made world.
format Article
id doaj-art-b13e4706d2974e40b04fa54e750358bf
institution OA Journals
issn 2399-3650
language English
publishDate 2025-05-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Communications Physics
spelling doaj-art-b13e4706d2974e40b04fa54e750358bf2025-08-20T01:49:44ZengNature PortfolioCommunications Physics2399-36502025-05-01811610.1038/s42005-025-02087-0Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughnessAntony Sutanto0Suhib Abu-Qbeitah1Avishai Jeselsohn2Brendan M. Unikewicz3Joseph E. Bonavia4Stephen Rudolph5Hudson Borja da Rocha6S. Kiana Naghibzadeh7Tal Cohen8Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologySchool of Mathematical & Statistical Sciences, University of GalwayDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyAbstract One experiment commonly used to teach young students about the response of structures to dynamic loading is the “egg drop challenge”, in which students design a device to protect an egg from cracking after a fall from a specified height. Relevant to this activity is the choice of orientation of the egg to decrease the probability of fracture. In this study, we contest the commonly held belief that an egg is strongest when dropped vertically on its end. Through hundreds of experiments and a set of static and dynamic simulations, we demonstrate a statistically significant decrease in the likelihood that an egg breaks when oriented horizontally as opposed to vertically, and offer a concrete and intuitive explanation as to why this is the case. These results and the associated analysis demonstrate the importance of specificity of language and the dangers of appealing to “common sense” in the physics classroom while having wide-ranging implications due to the ubiquity of shell structures in nature and in the man-made world.https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02087-0
spellingShingle Antony Sutanto
Suhib Abu-Qbeitah
Avishai Jeselsohn
Brendan M. Unikewicz
Joseph E. Bonavia
Stephen Rudolph
Hudson Borja da Rocha
S. Kiana Naghibzadeh
Tal Cohen
Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness
Communications Physics
title Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness
title_full Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness
title_fullStr Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness
title_full_unstemmed Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness
title_short Challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness
title_sort challenging common notions on how eggs break and the role of strength versus toughness
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02087-0
work_keys_str_mv AT antonysutanto challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT suhibabuqbeitah challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT avishaijeselsohn challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT brendanmunikewicz challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT josephebonavia challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT stephenrudolph challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT hudsonborjadarocha challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT skiananaghibzadeh challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness
AT talcohen challengingcommonnotionsonhoweggsbreakandtheroleofstrengthversustoughness