Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali

The school of Ahmad Ghazali, his beliefs and interpretations in the context of mysticism, have gained a special aspect of form and meaning. Ghazali's avoidance of directly and openly dealing with the field of mysticism, apart from the heterogeneity of the textual context of his works from other...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mehrdad Akbari Gandomani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Semnan University 2023-05-01
Series:مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_7745_71c785faf644053355185e7ecd47db59.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527775910952960
author Mehrdad Akbari Gandomani
author_facet Mehrdad Akbari Gandomani
author_sort Mehrdad Akbari Gandomani
collection DOAJ
description The school of Ahmad Ghazali, his beliefs and interpretations in the context of mysticism, have gained a special aspect of form and meaning. Ghazali's avoidance of directly and openly dealing with the field of mysticism, apart from the heterogeneity of the textual context of his works from other mystical works, has also caused ambiguity in the textual context. In the book of Ghazali's accidents, countless double confrontations can be seen at the surface level; however, due to the transformations that have occurred in the level of relationships and other levels related to them, the authority of the text of love stories has turned into a temporary and transitory situation. Therefore, at the level of deep construction, aligned with Derrida's logic, sometimes by deconstructing the strains of dual oppositions and transferring them, the levels of reality have been transformed into other levels of abstraction, and by creating new links between them, the arena of single meaning and certainty Meaning is challenged. This method has sometimes been associated with changing the value of signifiers, and sometimes by using both this and that style, instead of either this or that style (replacing difference instead of distinction), has caused the creation of a new level based on paradox. In the following article, after understanding terms such as: authority, familiar and foreign boundaries, difference and distinction, levels of abstraction, connection and difference, based on the descriptive-analytical method, the types of paradoxes in Ahmed Ghazali's accidents have been investigated.
format Article
id doaj-art-b127b6ed0b9b4d4795bad921afcd062d
institution Kabale University
issn 2008-9570
2717-090X
language fas
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Semnan University
record_format Article
series مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی
spelling doaj-art-b127b6ed0b9b4d4795bad921afcd062d2025-01-15T08:08:58ZfasSemnan Universityمطالعات زبانی و بلاغی2008-95702717-090X2023-05-01143173010.22075/jlrs.2022.27236.21037745Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad GhazaliMehrdad Akbari Gandomani0Assistant Professor of Persian Language and Literature, Arak University, Arak, IranThe school of Ahmad Ghazali, his beliefs and interpretations in the context of mysticism, have gained a special aspect of form and meaning. Ghazali's avoidance of directly and openly dealing with the field of mysticism, apart from the heterogeneity of the textual context of his works from other mystical works, has also caused ambiguity in the textual context. In the book of Ghazali's accidents, countless double confrontations can be seen at the surface level; however, due to the transformations that have occurred in the level of relationships and other levels related to them, the authority of the text of love stories has turned into a temporary and transitory situation. Therefore, at the level of deep construction, aligned with Derrida's logic, sometimes by deconstructing the strains of dual oppositions and transferring them, the levels of reality have been transformed into other levels of abstraction, and by creating new links between them, the arena of single meaning and certainty Meaning is challenged. This method has sometimes been associated with changing the value of signifiers, and sometimes by using both this and that style, instead of either this or that style (replacing difference instead of distinction), has caused the creation of a new level based on paradox. In the following article, after understanding terms such as: authority, familiar and foreign boundaries, difference and distinction, levels of abstraction, connection and difference, based on the descriptive-analytical method, the types of paradoxes in Ahmed Ghazali's accidents have been investigated.https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_7745_71c785faf644053355185e7ecd47db59.pdfparadoxdual contrastslevels of abstractionrelationdifference
spellingShingle Mehrdad Akbari Gandomani
Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali
مطالعات زبانی و بلاغی
paradox
dual contrasts
levels of abstraction
relation
difference
title Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali
title_full Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali
title_fullStr Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali
title_full_unstemmed Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali
title_short Levels of Abstraction, Contrast and Paradox in Sawāneḥ by Ahmad Ghazali
title_sort levels of abstraction contrast and paradox in sawaneh by ahmad ghazali
topic paradox
dual contrasts
levels of abstraction
relation
difference
url https://rhetorical.semnan.ac.ir/article_7745_71c785faf644053355185e7ecd47db59.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mehrdadakbarigandomani levelsofabstractioncontrastandparadoxinsawanehbyahmadghazali