A comparison of artificial urinary sphincter outcomes after primary implantation and first revision surgery
Objective: The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is the gold standard for severe male stress urinary incontinence, though evaluations of specific predictors for device outcomes are sparse. We sought to compare outcomes between primary and revision AUS surgery for non-infectious failures. Methods: W...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Kevin J. Hebert, Brian J. Linder, Griffin T. Morrisson, Laureano Rangel Latuche, Daniel S. Elliott |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2021-07-01
|
| Series: | Asian Journal of Urology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214388221000060 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Long-term efficacy and safety of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800<sup>ТМ</sup> implantations
by: E. I. Veliev, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Artificial urinary sphincter implantation after transperineal open reconstruction of post-prostatectomy vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis
by: Phillip Marks, et al.
Published: (2025-12-01) -
A case of artificial urinary sphincter implantation in a patient who underwent both urethroplasty and ileal neobladder construction
by: Hibiki Hirose, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01) -
Difficulties in Manipulating the Female Artificial Urinary Sphincter Pump: Prevalence and Management
by: Alexandre Dubois, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Day‐case artificial urinary sphincter for post‐prostatectomy incontinence: A comparative pilot study
by: Konstantinos Kapriniotis, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01)