Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction
# Background ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biome...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
North American Sports Medicine Institute
2023-06-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.77362 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1825139403012440064 |
|---|---|
| author | Steven Singleton Harrison Scofield Brittany Davis Alexandra Waller Craig Garrison Shiho Goto Joseph Hannon |
| author_facet | Steven Singleton Harrison Scofield Brittany Davis Alexandra Waller Craig Garrison Shiho Goto Joseph Hannon |
| author_sort | Steven Singleton |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | # Background
ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biomechanics and decrease in osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in metrics of knee joint loading during a single limb squat task between individuals following a primary ACL-r versus those who underwent a standard ACL-R with a patella bone-tendon-bone autograft.
# Study type
Case Control Study
# Methods
The ACL-r group \[n: 15, age(yrs): 38.8±13.9\] sustained a proximal ACL disruption that was amenable to repair, while the ACL-R group \[n: 15, age(yrs): 25.60±1.7\] underwent primary reconstruction with patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. At 12-weeks post-operation, both groups completed the IKDC questionnaire and biomechanical testing during performance of the single limb squat. Bilateral peak knee extension moment and total knee joint power as a measure of eccentric loading (contraction) during the descent phase of the squat were calculated on the surgical and non-surgical limb and averaged across the middle three of five trials. Participants also completed quadriceps strength testing on both limbs three months after surgery on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec. LSI (Limb Strength Index) was calculated for all variables. Separate ANCOVAs were performed on each biomechanical variable to examine differences between groups.
# Results
The ACL-r had a significantly greater peak knee extension moment LSI (ACL-r: 78.46±5.79%; ACL-R: 56.86±5.79%; p=0.019, ηp2=.186) and total knee joint power LSI (ACL-r: 72.47±7.39%; ACL-R: 39.70±7.39%, p=0.006, ηp2=.245) than the ACL-R group. The ACL-r also had a significantly greater quadriceps LSI than the ACL-R group (ACL-r: 66.318±4.61%, ACL-R: 48.03±4.61%, p=0.013, ηp2=.206).
# Conclusions
Individuals following ACL-r demonstrate increased knee joint loading symmetry during a single leg squat task and greater quadriceps strength symmetry at 12 weeks post-surgery compared to those who underwent ACL-R.
# Level of Evidence
3 |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b0e12d4e97ec458c8cda8c3f24fdef6d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2159-2896 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
| publisher | North American Sports Medicine Institute |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| spelling | doaj-art-b0e12d4e97ec458c8cda8c3f24fdef6d2025-02-11T20:29:49ZengNorth American Sports Medicine InstituteInternational Journal of Sports Physical Therapy2159-28962023-06-01183Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL ReconstructionSteven SingletonHarrison ScofieldBrittany DavisAlexandra WallerCraig GarrisonShiho GotoJoseph Hannon# Background ACL repair (ACL-r) has recently gained renewed clinical interest for treatment of ACL tears. ACL-r has several potential benefits over ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) including maintaining the native ACL innervation and blood supply, no graft site morbidity, and possible improved knee biomechanics and decrease in osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in metrics of knee joint loading during a single limb squat task between individuals following a primary ACL-r versus those who underwent a standard ACL-R with a patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. # Study type Case Control Study # Methods The ACL-r group \[n: 15, age(yrs): 38.8±13.9\] sustained a proximal ACL disruption that was amenable to repair, while the ACL-R group \[n: 15, age(yrs): 25.60±1.7\] underwent primary reconstruction with patella bone-tendon-bone autograft. At 12-weeks post-operation, both groups completed the IKDC questionnaire and biomechanical testing during performance of the single limb squat. Bilateral peak knee extension moment and total knee joint power as a measure of eccentric loading (contraction) during the descent phase of the squat were calculated on the surgical and non-surgical limb and averaged across the middle three of five trials. Participants also completed quadriceps strength testing on both limbs three months after surgery on an isokinetic dynamometer at 60°/sec. LSI (Limb Strength Index) was calculated for all variables. Separate ANCOVAs were performed on each biomechanical variable to examine differences between groups. # Results The ACL-r had a significantly greater peak knee extension moment LSI (ACL-r: 78.46±5.79%; ACL-R: 56.86±5.79%; p=0.019, ηp2=.186) and total knee joint power LSI (ACL-r: 72.47±7.39%; ACL-R: 39.70±7.39%, p=0.006, ηp2=.245) than the ACL-R group. The ACL-r also had a significantly greater quadriceps LSI than the ACL-R group (ACL-r: 66.318±4.61%, ACL-R: 48.03±4.61%, p=0.013, ηp2=.206). # Conclusions Individuals following ACL-r demonstrate increased knee joint loading symmetry during a single leg squat task and greater quadriceps strength symmetry at 12 weeks post-surgery compared to those who underwent ACL-R. # Level of Evidence 3https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.77362 |
| spellingShingle | Steven Singleton Harrison Scofield Brittany Davis Alexandra Waller Craig Garrison Shiho Goto Joseph Hannon Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy |
| title | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction |
| title_full | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction |
| title_fullStr | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction |
| title_full_unstemmed | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction |
| title_short | Altered Knee Loading Following Primary ACL Repair versus ACL Reconstruction |
| title_sort | altered knee loading following primary acl repair versus acl reconstruction |
| url | https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.77362 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT stevensingleton alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT harrisonscofield alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT brittanydavis alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT alexandrawaller alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT craiggarrison alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT shihogoto alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction AT josephhannon alteredkneeloadingfollowingprimaryaclrepairversusaclreconstruction |