Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering Education

An important condition for the digital transformation of education is the subjectivity of students and teachers. The formation of subjectivity as the ability to set one’s own goals and change either oneself or the educational environment to achieve them raises a number of questions: what is meant by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. K. Geykhman, V. S. Kabanov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow Polytechnic University 2022-01-01
Series:Высшее образование в России
Subjects:
Online Access:https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3201
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832574466721316864
author L. K. Geykhman
V. S. Kabanov
author_facet L. K. Geykhman
V. S. Kabanov
author_sort L. K. Geykhman
collection DOAJ
description An important condition for the digital transformation of education is the subjectivity of students and teachers. The formation of subjectivity as the ability to set one’s own goals and change either oneself or the educational environment to achieve them raises a number of questions: what is meant by the subjectivity of a student and a teacher, what does it mean to be a subject of the educational process, which factors contribute to and which hinder the formation of subjectivity. The authors focus on the conditions that promote and prevent the formation of subjectivity in master’s education of future engineers. Based on a review of foreign and domestic approaches to understanding subjectivity and the conditions for its development, it is concluded that all researchers distinguish similar aspects and manifestations in subjectivity: motivational (intrinsic motivation), emotional-valuable (proactive and responsible attitude to life), regulatory (the ability to set goals and follow them through to the end), cognitive (desire and ability to apply knowledge) and practical (skills, experience of independent activity). It has been established that foreign studies more often consider subjectivity as a resource, which improves the quality of education, while Russian studies consider it as a goal and a result of education. The article describes a taxonomy of subjectivity, which allows to measure it as an educational result. Based on the analysis of necessary and sufficient conditions for subjectivity formation, the hypothesis is made that the sufficient condition for subjectivity formation in mastering the “pedagogics” discipline is stepwise equitable partnership between all subjects of educational process. The condition is specified as a sequence of actions of a teacher and a master’s student in the process of mastering the discipline. The article describes the results of a pedagogical experiment in a group of master’s students of PNRPU Faculty of Civil Engineering, aimed at testing the proposed conditions. The results obtained show that step-bystep organized peer-to-peer interaction enabled most students in the experimental group to achieve the subjectivity level by the end of the discipline, while in the control group most students reached only the objectivity level. The motivational and practical aspects of subjectivity changed most significantly in the experimental group.
format Article
id doaj-art-b0da6163ad524f558c368e47fe91f5de
institution Kabale University
issn 0869-3617
2072-0459
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Moscow Polytechnic University
record_format Article
series Высшее образование в России
spelling doaj-art-b0da6163ad524f558c368e47fe91f5de2025-02-01T13:14:30ZengMoscow Polytechnic UniversityВысшее образование в России0869-36172072-04592022-01-01301214315610.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-12-143-1561868Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering EducationL. K. Geykhman0V. S. Kabanov1Perm National Research Polytechnic UniversityPerm National Research Polytechnic UniversityAn important condition for the digital transformation of education is the subjectivity of students and teachers. The formation of subjectivity as the ability to set one’s own goals and change either oneself or the educational environment to achieve them raises a number of questions: what is meant by the subjectivity of a student and a teacher, what does it mean to be a subject of the educational process, which factors contribute to and which hinder the formation of subjectivity. The authors focus on the conditions that promote and prevent the formation of subjectivity in master’s education of future engineers. Based on a review of foreign and domestic approaches to understanding subjectivity and the conditions for its development, it is concluded that all researchers distinguish similar aspects and manifestations in subjectivity: motivational (intrinsic motivation), emotional-valuable (proactive and responsible attitude to life), regulatory (the ability to set goals and follow them through to the end), cognitive (desire and ability to apply knowledge) and practical (skills, experience of independent activity). It has been established that foreign studies more often consider subjectivity as a resource, which improves the quality of education, while Russian studies consider it as a goal and a result of education. The article describes a taxonomy of subjectivity, which allows to measure it as an educational result. Based on the analysis of necessary and sufficient conditions for subjectivity formation, the hypothesis is made that the sufficient condition for subjectivity formation in mastering the “pedagogics” discipline is stepwise equitable partnership between all subjects of educational process. The condition is specified as a sequence of actions of a teacher and a master’s student in the process of mastering the discipline. The article describes the results of a pedagogical experiment in a group of master’s students of PNRPU Faculty of Civil Engineering, aimed at testing the proposed conditions. The results obtained show that step-bystep organized peer-to-peer interaction enabled most students in the experimental group to achieve the subjectivity level by the end of the discipline, while in the control group most students reached only the objectivity level. The motivational and practical aspects of subjectivity changed most significantly in the experimental group.https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3201subjectivityformation of subjectivityinteractive approachtaxonomy of educational resultsstepwise peer-to-peer interaction
spellingShingle L. K. Geykhman
V. S. Kabanov
Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering Education
Высшее образование в России
subjectivity
formation of subjectivity
interactive approach
taxonomy of educational results
stepwise peer-to-peer interaction
title Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering Education
title_full Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering Education
title_fullStr Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering Education
title_full_unstemmed Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering Education
title_short Subjectivity Formation of a Technical University Master’s Student: A New Challenge for Engineering Education
title_sort subjectivity formation of a technical university master s student a new challenge for engineering education
topic subjectivity
formation of subjectivity
interactive approach
taxonomy of educational results
stepwise peer-to-peer interaction
url https://vovr.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/3201
work_keys_str_mv AT lkgeykhman subjectivityformationofatechnicaluniversitymastersstudentanewchallengeforengineeringeducation
AT vskabanov subjectivityformationofatechnicaluniversitymastersstudentanewchallengeforengineeringeducation