Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective

Shale oil has emerged as a significant issue in global energy reform and sustainable development, recognized for its high water consumption. Existing water footprint studies, which predominantly focus on shale gas, inadequately address shale oil's unique resource characteristics and neglect key...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qian Wang, Bo Yuan, Jian Wu, Jun Xiong, Wenshi Liu, Xi Chen, Yan Wu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-09-01
Series:Energy Nexus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001445
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849225277176020992
author Qian Wang
Bo Yuan
Jian Wu
Jun Xiong
Wenshi Liu
Xi Chen
Yan Wu
author_facet Qian Wang
Bo Yuan
Jian Wu
Jun Xiong
Wenshi Liu
Xi Chen
Yan Wu
author_sort Qian Wang
collection DOAJ
description Shale oil has emerged as a significant issue in global energy reform and sustainable development, recognized for its high water consumption. Existing water footprint studies, which predominantly focus on shale gas, inadequately address shale oil's unique resource characteristics and neglect key factors such as wastewater treatment. This study developed a Water Footprint Assessment Tool (WFAT) that integrates regression-based empirical models derived from historical shale oilfield data with the Water Footprint Network (WFN) methodology, aiming to holistically evaluate the water footprint across the entire shale oil production lifecycle. The WFAT systematically quantifies blue water footprint and incorporates the gray water footprint linked to wastewater treatment demands and energy-related indirect water footprint. When applied to a shale oilfield in Qingyang city, the WFAT results indicate a total water footprint of 107.39 m³/t, primarily driven by hydraulic fracturing process. Notably, the blue water footprint contributes merely 1.52% to the total footprint, while the gray water footprint dominates (98.15%), with fracturing-induced flowback water treatment being the largest contributor. Shale oil exhibits higher water use intensity (26.12 L/GJ) compared to shale gas (2.6 to 9.3 L/GJ) but aligns with coal and natural gas, and its produced water intensity (25.5 L/GJ) surpasses shale gas (3.9–7.3 L/GJ), reflecting greater water production attributed to geological-engineering synergies. The recycling rate of flowback water is identified as a pivotal parameter for footprint reduction through sensitivity analysis. This study provides a reference for water resource assessment and management to balance energy extraction with water conservation in water-stressed regions.
format Article
id doaj-art-b0c43c2a73bf49548c29a3afd2dfff75
institution Kabale University
issn 2772-4271
language English
publishDate 2025-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Energy Nexus
spelling doaj-art-b0c43c2a73bf49548c29a3afd2dfff752025-08-25T04:14:55ZengElsevierEnergy Nexus2772-42712025-09-011910050310.1016/j.nexus.2025.100503Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspectiveQian Wang0Bo Yuan1Jian Wu2Jun Xiong3Wenshi Liu4Xi Chen5Yan Wu6College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology, Beijing 102206, ChinaCNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology, Beijing 102206, ChinaInstitute of Safety, Environmental Protection and Technical Supervision, PetroChina Southwest Oil & GasField Company, Chengdu 610095, ChinaCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Corresponding authors.College of Arts and Sciences, Department of Geography and Geographic Information Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USACollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China; Corresponding authors.Shale oil has emerged as a significant issue in global energy reform and sustainable development, recognized for its high water consumption. Existing water footprint studies, which predominantly focus on shale gas, inadequately address shale oil's unique resource characteristics and neglect key factors such as wastewater treatment. This study developed a Water Footprint Assessment Tool (WFAT) that integrates regression-based empirical models derived from historical shale oilfield data with the Water Footprint Network (WFN) methodology, aiming to holistically evaluate the water footprint across the entire shale oil production lifecycle. The WFAT systematically quantifies blue water footprint and incorporates the gray water footprint linked to wastewater treatment demands and energy-related indirect water footprint. When applied to a shale oilfield in Qingyang city, the WFAT results indicate a total water footprint of 107.39 m³/t, primarily driven by hydraulic fracturing process. Notably, the blue water footprint contributes merely 1.52% to the total footprint, while the gray water footprint dominates (98.15%), with fracturing-induced flowback water treatment being the largest contributor. Shale oil exhibits higher water use intensity (26.12 L/GJ) compared to shale gas (2.6 to 9.3 L/GJ) but aligns with coal and natural gas, and its produced water intensity (25.5 L/GJ) surpasses shale gas (3.9–7.3 L/GJ), reflecting greater water production attributed to geological-engineering synergies. The recycling rate of flowback water is identified as a pivotal parameter for footprint reduction through sensitivity analysis. This study provides a reference for water resource assessment and management to balance energy extraction with water conservation in water-stressed regions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001445Shale oilWater consumptionWater footprintWater footprint assessment tool
spellingShingle Qian Wang
Bo Yuan
Jian Wu
Jun Xiong
Wenshi Liu
Xi Chen
Yan Wu
Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective
Energy Nexus
Shale oil
Water consumption
Water footprint
Water footprint assessment tool
title Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective
title_full Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective
title_fullStr Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective
title_full_unstemmed Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective
title_short Gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil: A lifecycle perspective
title_sort gray water dominance in water footprint assessment of shale oil a lifecycle perspective
topic Shale oil
Water consumption
Water footprint
Water footprint assessment tool
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772427125001445
work_keys_str_mv AT qianwang graywaterdominanceinwaterfootprintassessmentofshaleoilalifecycleperspective
AT boyuan graywaterdominanceinwaterfootprintassessmentofshaleoilalifecycleperspective
AT jianwu graywaterdominanceinwaterfootprintassessmentofshaleoilalifecycleperspective
AT junxiong graywaterdominanceinwaterfootprintassessmentofshaleoilalifecycleperspective
AT wenshiliu graywaterdominanceinwaterfootprintassessmentofshaleoilalifecycleperspective
AT xichen graywaterdominanceinwaterfootprintassessmentofshaleoilalifecycleperspective
AT yanwu graywaterdominanceinwaterfootprintassessmentofshaleoilalifecycleperspective