Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical Spine
The primary objective of the present study was to determine how simulated severe cervical pain affects cervical motion in patients suffering from two distinct chronic cervical disorders: whiplash (n=25) and degenerative changes (n=25). The second objective was to derive an index that would allow the...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2004-01-01
|
Series: | Pain Research and Management |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/926453 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832548840871297024 |
---|---|
author | Zeevi Dvir Noga Gal-Eshel Boaz Shamir Evgeny Pevzner Chava Peretz Nachshon Knoller |
author_facet | Zeevi Dvir Noga Gal-Eshel Boaz Shamir Evgeny Pevzner Chava Peretz Nachshon Knoller |
author_sort | Zeevi Dvir |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The primary objective of the present study was to determine how simulated severe cervical pain affects cervical motion in patients suffering from two distinct chronic cervical disorders: whiplash (n=25) and degenerative changes (n=25). The second objective was to derive an index that would allow the differentiation of maximal from submaximal performances of cervical range of motion. Patients first performed maximal movement of the head (maximal effort) in each of the six primary directions and then repeated the test as if they were suffering from a much more intense level of pain (submaximal effort). All measurements were repeated within four to seven days. In both groups, there was significant compression of cervical motion during the submaximal effort. This compression was also highly stable on a test-retest basis. In both groups, a significantly higher average coefficient of variation was associated with the imagined pain and it was significantly different between the two clinical groups. In the whiplash group, a logistic regression model allowed the derivation of coefficient of variation-based cutoff scores that might, at selected levels of probability and an individual level, identify chronic whiplash patients who intentionally magnify their motion restriction using pain as a cue. However, the relatively small and very stable compression of cervical motion under pain simulation supports the view that the likelihood that chronic whiplash patients are magnifying their restriction of cervical range of motion using pain as a cue is very low. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-b0ab950072e7446b9a2e518279874119 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1203-6765 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Pain Research and Management |
spelling | doaj-art-b0ab950072e7446b9a2e5182798741192025-02-03T06:12:55ZengWileyPain Research and Management1203-67652004-01-019313113610.1155/2004/926453Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical SpineZeevi Dvir0Noga Gal-Eshel1Boaz Shamir2Evgeny Pevzner3Chava Peretz4Nachshon Knoller5Department of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelDepartment of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelDepartment of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelSpine Surgery Unit, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Sappir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, IsraelDepartment of Physical Therapy, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelThe primary objective of the present study was to determine how simulated severe cervical pain affects cervical motion in patients suffering from two distinct chronic cervical disorders: whiplash (n=25) and degenerative changes (n=25). The second objective was to derive an index that would allow the differentiation of maximal from submaximal performances of cervical range of motion. Patients first performed maximal movement of the head (maximal effort) in each of the six primary directions and then repeated the test as if they were suffering from a much more intense level of pain (submaximal effort). All measurements were repeated within four to seven days. In both groups, there was significant compression of cervical motion during the submaximal effort. This compression was also highly stable on a test-retest basis. In both groups, a significantly higher average coefficient of variation was associated with the imagined pain and it was significantly different between the two clinical groups. In the whiplash group, a logistic regression model allowed the derivation of coefficient of variation-based cutoff scores that might, at selected levels of probability and an individual level, identify chronic whiplash patients who intentionally magnify their motion restriction using pain as a cue. However, the relatively small and very stable compression of cervical motion under pain simulation supports the view that the likelihood that chronic whiplash patients are magnifying their restriction of cervical range of motion using pain as a cue is very low.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/926453 |
spellingShingle | Zeevi Dvir Noga Gal-Eshel Boaz Shamir Evgeny Pevzner Chava Peretz Nachshon Knoller Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical Spine Pain Research and Management |
title | Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical Spine |
title_full | Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical Spine |
title_fullStr | Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical Spine |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical Spine |
title_short | Simulated Pain and Cervical Motion in Patients with Chronic Disorders of the Cervical Spine |
title_sort | simulated pain and cervical motion in patients with chronic disorders of the cervical spine |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2004/926453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zeevidvir simulatedpainandcervicalmotioninpatientswithchronicdisordersofthecervicalspine AT nogagaleshel simulatedpainandcervicalmotioninpatientswithchronicdisordersofthecervicalspine AT boazshamir simulatedpainandcervicalmotioninpatientswithchronicdisordersofthecervicalspine AT evgenypevzner simulatedpainandcervicalmotioninpatientswithchronicdisordersofthecervicalspine AT chavaperetz simulatedpainandcervicalmotioninpatientswithchronicdisordersofthecervicalspine AT nachshonknoller simulatedpainandcervicalmotioninpatientswithchronicdisordersofthecervicalspine |