Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food

Abstract In the context of entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2022/1616, EFSA updated the scientific guidance to assist applicants in the preparation of applications for the authorisation or for the modification of an existing authorisation of a ‘post‐consumer mechanical PET’ recycling process (as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP), Claude Lambré, José Manuel Barat Baviera, Claudia Bolognesi, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Riccardo Crebelli, David Michael Gott, Konrad Grob, Marcel Mengelers, Alicja Mortensen, Gilles Rivière, Inger‐Lise Steffensen, Christina Tlustos, Henk Van Loveren, Laurence Vernis, Holger Zorn, Vincent Dudler, Maria Rosaria Milana, Constantine Papaspyrides, Maria de Fátima Tavares Poças, Gianluca Colombo, Daniele Comandella, Alexandros Lioupis, Remigio Marano, Irene Pilar Munoz Guajardo, Elisa Savini, Vasiliki Sfika, Emmanouil Tsochatzis, Katharina Volk, Evgenia Lampi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-07-01
Series:EFSA Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8879
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849318816370130944
author EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
Claude Lambré
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Marcel Mengelers
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Vincent Dudler
Maria Rosaria Milana
Constantine Papaspyrides
Maria de Fátima Tavares Poças
Gianluca Colombo
Daniele Comandella
Alexandros Lioupis
Remigio Marano
Irene Pilar Munoz Guajardo
Elisa Savini
Vasiliki Sfika
Emmanouil Tsochatzis
Katharina Volk
Evgenia Lampi
author_facet EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
Claude Lambré
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Marcel Mengelers
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Vincent Dudler
Maria Rosaria Milana
Constantine Papaspyrides
Maria de Fátima Tavares Poças
Gianluca Colombo
Daniele Comandella
Alexandros Lioupis
Remigio Marano
Irene Pilar Munoz Guajardo
Elisa Savini
Vasiliki Sfika
Emmanouil Tsochatzis
Katharina Volk
Evgenia Lampi
author_sort EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
collection DOAJ
description Abstract In the context of entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2022/1616, EFSA updated the scientific guidance to assist applicants in the preparation of applications for the authorisation or for the modification of an existing authorisation of a ‘post‐consumer mechanical PET’ recycling process (as defined in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2022/1616) intended to be used for manufacturing materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. This Guidance describes the evaluation criteria and the scientific evaluation approach that EFSA will apply to assess the decontamination capability of recycling processes, as well as the information required to be included in an application dossier. The principle of the scientific evaluation approach is to apply the decontamination efficiency of a recycling process, obtained from a challenge test with surrogate contaminants, to a reference contamination level for post‐consumer PET, set at 3 mg/kg PET for a contaminant resulting from possible misuse. The resulting residual concentration of each surrogate in recycled PET is then compared to a modelled concentration in PET that is calculated using generally recognised conservative migration models, such that the related migration does not give rise to a dietary exposure exceeding 0.0025 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day. This is the lowest threshold for toxicological concern (TTC) value, i.e. for potential genotoxicity, below which the risk to human health would be negligible. The information to be provided in the applications relates to: the recycling process (i.e. collection and pre‐processing of the input, decontamination process, post‐processing and intended use); the determination of the decontamination efficiency by the challenge test; the self‐evaluation of the recycling process. On the basis of the submitted data, EFSA will assess the safety of the mechanical PET recycling process.
format Article
id doaj-art-b0586b08984444f99d786c84c87e25fe
institution Kabale University
issn 1831-4732
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series EFSA Journal
spelling doaj-art-b0586b08984444f99d786c84c87e25fe2025-08-20T03:50:44ZengWileyEFSA Journal1831-47322024-07-01227n/an/a10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8879Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with foodEFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)Claude LambréJosé Manuel Barat BavieraClaudia BolognesiAndrew ChessonPier Sandro CocconcelliRiccardo CrebelliDavid Michael GottKonrad GrobMarcel MengelersAlicja MortensenGilles RivièreInger‐Lise SteffensenChristina TlustosHenk Van LoverenLaurence VernisHolger ZornVincent DudlerMaria Rosaria MilanaConstantine PapaspyridesMaria de Fátima Tavares PoçasGianluca ColomboDaniele ComandellaAlexandros LioupisRemigio MaranoIrene Pilar Munoz GuajardoElisa SaviniVasiliki SfikaEmmanouil TsochatzisKatharina VolkEvgenia LampiAbstract In the context of entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2022/1616, EFSA updated the scientific guidance to assist applicants in the preparation of applications for the authorisation or for the modification of an existing authorisation of a ‘post‐consumer mechanical PET’ recycling process (as defined in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2022/1616) intended to be used for manufacturing materials and articles intended to come into contact with food. This Guidance describes the evaluation criteria and the scientific evaluation approach that EFSA will apply to assess the decontamination capability of recycling processes, as well as the information required to be included in an application dossier. The principle of the scientific evaluation approach is to apply the decontamination efficiency of a recycling process, obtained from a challenge test with surrogate contaminants, to a reference contamination level for post‐consumer PET, set at 3 mg/kg PET for a contaminant resulting from possible misuse. The resulting residual concentration of each surrogate in recycled PET is then compared to a modelled concentration in PET that is calculated using generally recognised conservative migration models, such that the related migration does not give rise to a dietary exposure exceeding 0.0025 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day. This is the lowest threshold for toxicological concern (TTC) value, i.e. for potential genotoxicity, below which the risk to human health would be negligible. The information to be provided in the applications relates to: the recycling process (i.e. collection and pre‐processing of the input, decontamination process, post‐processing and intended use); the determination of the decontamination efficiency by the challenge test; the self‐evaluation of the recycling process. On the basis of the submitted data, EFSA will assess the safety of the mechanical PET recycling process.https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8879applicationsevaluation principlesguidancemechanical PET recyclingpost‐consumersafety assessment
spellingShingle EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes and Processing Aids (CEP)
Claude Lambré
José Manuel Barat Baviera
Claudia Bolognesi
Andrew Chesson
Pier Sandro Cocconcelli
Riccardo Crebelli
David Michael Gott
Konrad Grob
Marcel Mengelers
Alicja Mortensen
Gilles Rivière
Inger‐Lise Steffensen
Christina Tlustos
Henk Van Loveren
Laurence Vernis
Holger Zorn
Vincent Dudler
Maria Rosaria Milana
Constantine Papaspyrides
Maria de Fátima Tavares Poças
Gianluca Colombo
Daniele Comandella
Alexandros Lioupis
Remigio Marano
Irene Pilar Munoz Guajardo
Elisa Savini
Vasiliki Sfika
Emmanouil Tsochatzis
Katharina Volk
Evgenia Lampi
Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food
EFSA Journal
applications
evaluation principles
guidance
mechanical PET recycling
post‐consumer
safety assessment
title Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food
title_full Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food
title_fullStr Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food
title_short Scientific Guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post‐consumer mechanical PET recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food
title_sort scientific guidance on the criteria for the evaluation and on the preparation of applications for the safety assessment of post consumer mechanical pet recycling processes intended to be used for manufacture of materials and articles in contact with food
topic applications
evaluation principles
guidance
mechanical PET recycling
post‐consumer
safety assessment
url https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8879
work_keys_str_mv AT efsapanelonfoodcontactmaterialsenzymesandprocessingaidscep scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT claudelambre scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT josemanuelbaratbaviera scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT claudiabolognesi scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT andrewchesson scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT piersandrococconcelli scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT riccardocrebelli scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT davidmichaelgott scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT konradgrob scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT marcelmengelers scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT alicjamortensen scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT gillesriviere scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT ingerlisesteffensen scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT christinatlustos scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT henkvanloveren scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT laurencevernis scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT holgerzorn scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT vincentdudler scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT mariarosariamilana scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT constantinepapaspyrides scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT mariadefatimatavarespocas scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT gianlucacolombo scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT danielecomandella scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT alexandroslioupis scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT remigiomarano scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT irenepilarmunozguajardo scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT elisasavini scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT vasilikisfika scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT emmanouiltsochatzis scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT katharinavolk scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood
AT evgenialampi scientificguidanceonthecriteriafortheevaluationandonthepreparationofapplicationsforthesafetyassessmentofpostconsumermechanicalpetrecyclingprocessesintendedtobeusedformanufactureofmaterialsandarticlesincontactwithfood