Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions
Abstract Import restrictions on deforestation-linked commodities have been enacted with the goal of reducing global deforestation and emissions. However, the limited market share of importers imposing such restrictions and the potential for emissions leakage could reduce their effectiveness. Moreove...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Nature Communications |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56693-1 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850067485798170624 |
|---|---|
| author | Brinda Yarlagadda Xin Zhao Gokul Iyer Thomas Wild Nathan Hultman Jonathan Lamontagne |
| author_facet | Brinda Yarlagadda Xin Zhao Gokul Iyer Thomas Wild Nathan Hultman Jonathan Lamontagne |
| author_sort | Brinda Yarlagadda |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Abstract Import restrictions on deforestation-linked commodities have been enacted with the goal of reducing global deforestation and emissions. However, the limited market share of importers imposing such restrictions and the potential for emissions leakage could reduce their effectiveness. Moreover, they could result in negative economic implications for producers and consumers. We quantify future emissions and economic implications of oil palm and soybean import restrictions. Current EU restrictions are likely to have minimal impact due to the EU’s otherwise small and declining share of global palm and soy demand. If extended beyond the EU, import restrictions could lead to reductions in cumulative land use change (LUC) emissions by 2050 in key oil crop exporting regions - up to 1.6% in Indonesia, 2.1% in the rest of Southeast Asia, 4.6% in Argentina, and 8.3% in Brazil compared to a no restrictions scenario. Globally, however, direct forest protection could be more effective than indirect protection through import restrictions due to emissions leakage. Meanwhile, import restrictions could cause major exporters to lose $0.1-$280 billion in cumulative agricultural production revenues by 2050. More broadly, our study highlights that the effectiveness of import restriction policies in reducing global emissions will likely depend on coordinated action across major oil crop producing and consuming regions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b01a3bdd13d34d3e93a2cf0aa2f250b3 |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 2041-1723 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Nature Portfolio |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Nature Communications |
| spelling | doaj-art-b01a3bdd13d34d3e93a2cf0aa2f250b32025-08-20T02:48:18ZengNature PortfolioNature Communications2041-17232025-02-011611910.1038/s41467-025-56693-1Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictionsBrinda Yarlagadda0Xin Zhao1Gokul Iyer2Thomas Wild3Nathan Hultman4Jonathan Lamontagne5Center for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of MarylandJoint Global Change Research Institute, Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryCenter for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of MarylandCenter for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of MarylandCenter for Global Sustainability, School of Public Policy, University of MarylandDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts UniversityAbstract Import restrictions on deforestation-linked commodities have been enacted with the goal of reducing global deforestation and emissions. However, the limited market share of importers imposing such restrictions and the potential for emissions leakage could reduce their effectiveness. Moreover, they could result in negative economic implications for producers and consumers. We quantify future emissions and economic implications of oil palm and soybean import restrictions. Current EU restrictions are likely to have minimal impact due to the EU’s otherwise small and declining share of global palm and soy demand. If extended beyond the EU, import restrictions could lead to reductions in cumulative land use change (LUC) emissions by 2050 in key oil crop exporting regions - up to 1.6% in Indonesia, 2.1% in the rest of Southeast Asia, 4.6% in Argentina, and 8.3% in Brazil compared to a no restrictions scenario. Globally, however, direct forest protection could be more effective than indirect protection through import restrictions due to emissions leakage. Meanwhile, import restrictions could cause major exporters to lose $0.1-$280 billion in cumulative agricultural production revenues by 2050. More broadly, our study highlights that the effectiveness of import restriction policies in reducing global emissions will likely depend on coordinated action across major oil crop producing and consuming regions.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56693-1 |
| spellingShingle | Brinda Yarlagadda Xin Zhao Gokul Iyer Thomas Wild Nathan Hultman Jonathan Lamontagne Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions Nature Communications |
| title | Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions |
| title_full | Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions |
| title_fullStr | Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions |
| title_full_unstemmed | Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions |
| title_short | Emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation-linked oil crop import restrictions |
| title_sort | emissions leakage and economic losses may undermine deforestation linked oil crop import restrictions |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-56693-1 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT brindayarlagadda emissionsleakageandeconomiclossesmayunderminedeforestationlinkedoilcropimportrestrictions AT xinzhao emissionsleakageandeconomiclossesmayunderminedeforestationlinkedoilcropimportrestrictions AT gokuliyer emissionsleakageandeconomiclossesmayunderminedeforestationlinkedoilcropimportrestrictions AT thomaswild emissionsleakageandeconomiclossesmayunderminedeforestationlinkedoilcropimportrestrictions AT nathanhultman emissionsleakageandeconomiclossesmayunderminedeforestationlinkedoilcropimportrestrictions AT jonathanlamontagne emissionsleakageandeconomiclossesmayunderminedeforestationlinkedoilcropimportrestrictions |